Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex

Repetition suppression, which refers to reduced neural activity for repeated stimuli, is typically explained by bottom-up or local adaptation mechanisms. However, recent theories have emphasized the role of top-down processes, suggesting that this response reduction reflects the fulfillment of perceptual expectations. To support this, an influential human fMRI study showed that the magnitude of suppression is modulated by the probability of a repetition. No such repetition probability effect was found in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex for spiking activity despite the presence of repetition suppression. Contrary to the human fMRI studies that showed an effect of repetition probability, the macaque single-unit study used a large variety of unfamiliar stimuli and the monkeys were not required to attend the stimuli. Here, as in the human fMRI studies, we used faces as stimuli and made the monkeys attend to the stimulus content. We simultaneously recorded spiking activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in the middle lateral face patch (ML) of one monkey (male) and a face-responsive region of another (female). Although we observed significant repetition suppression of spiking activity and high gamma-band LFPs in both animals, there were no effects of repetition probability even when repetitions were task relevant and repetition probability affected behavioral decisions. In conclusion, despite the use of face stimuli and a stimulus-related task, no neural signature of repetition probability was present for faces in a face responsive patch of macaque IT. This further challenges a general perceptual expectation account of repetition suppression. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Repetition suppression is a reduced brain activity for repeated stimuli commonly observed across species. In the predictive coding framework, such suppression is thought to reflect fulfilled perceptual expectations. Although this hypothesis is supported by several human fMRI studies reporting an effect of repetition probability on repetition suppression, this could not be replicated in single-cell recordings in monkey inferior temporal (IT) cortex. Subsequent studies narrowed down the conditions for the effect to requiring attention and being limited to particular stimulus categories such as faces. Here, we show that, even under these conditions, repetition suppression in monkey IT neurons is still unaffected by repetition probability, even in a task with a behavioral effect, challenging the perceptual expectation account of repetition suppression.

[1]  R. Vogels,et al.  Repetition Probability Does Not Affect fMRI Repetition Suppression for Objects , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Stanley,et al.  Rapid Sensory Adaptation Redux: A Circuit Perspective , 2016, Neuron.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Reply to Vinken and Vogels , 2017, Current Biology.

[4]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Fine-grained stimulus representations in body selective areas of human occipito-temporal cortex , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Less Is More: Expectation Sharpens Representations in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[6]  Mareike Grotheer,et al.  Repetition probability effects for inverted faces , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  Yan Liu,et al.  Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Ivo D. Popivanov,et al.  Probabilistic and Single-Subject Retinotopic Maps Reveal the Topographic Organization of Face Patches in the Macaque Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Mareike Grotheer,et al.  Repetition Probability Effects Depend on Prior Experiences , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Thomas Guthier,et al.  Visual motion processing , 2016 .

[11]  Vanessa M. Johnen,et al.  Human Scalp Electroencephalography Reveals that Repetition Suppression Varies with Expectation , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Sources of adaptation of inferior temporal cortical responses , 2016, Cortex.

[14]  F. D. de Lange,et al.  Prior Expectations Bias Sensory Representations in Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[16]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2016, Current Biology.

[17]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Olson,et al.  Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  C. Olson,et al.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Optogenetic and pharmacological suppression of spatial clusters of face neurons reveal their causal role in face gender discrimination , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Martin Kronbichler,et al.  Neural repetition suppression: evidence for perceptual expectation in object-selective regions , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  R. Henson,et al.  The effect of perceptual expectation on repetition suppression to faces is not modulated by variation in autistic traits , 2016, Cortex.

[23]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[24]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  The effect of face patch microstimulation on perception of faces and objects , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Todorović,et al.  Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Klára Vicsi,et al.  FMRI repetition suppression for voices is modulated by stimulus expectations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[28]  Matthijs Verhage,et al.  A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  The effects of delay duration on visual working memory for orientation , 2017, Journal of vision.

[30]  Joris Vangeneugden,et al.  Stimulus Similarity-Contingent Neural Adaptation Can Be Time and Cortical Area Dependent , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Targeting the functional properties of cortical neurons using fMR-adaptation , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Bottom-Up Dependent Gating of Frontal Signals in Early Visual Cortex , 2008, Science.

[33]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Expectation modulates repetition priming under high stimulus variability , 2017, Journal of vision.

[34]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  R. Vogels,et al.  Effect of adapter duration on repetition suppression in inferior temporal cortex , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Helen C. Barron,et al.  Repetition suppression: a means to index neural representations using BOLD? , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  R. Vogels,et al.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Vogels,et al.  Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Patches with Links: A Unified System for Processing Faces in the Macaque Temporal Lobe , 2008, Science.

[40]  G. Orban,et al.  How task-related are the responses of inferior temporal neurons? , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[41]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Face recognition systems in monkey and human: are they the same thing? , 2013, F1000prime reports.

[42]  Wilbert Zarco,et al.  A causal relationship between face-patch activity and face-detection behavior , 2017, eLife.

[43]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Recent Visual Experience Shapes Visual Processing in Rats through Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Response Enhancement , 2017, Current Biology.

[44]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[45]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Color-Biased Regions of the Ventral Visual Pathway Lie between Face- and Place-Selective Regions in Humans, as in Macaques , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  R. Vogels,et al.  Neurons in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex Show No Surprise Response to Deviants in Visual Oddball Sequences , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Floris P de Lange,et al.  Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Jonas Larsson,et al.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[52]  Mareike Grotheer,et al.  The relationship between stimulus repetitions and fulfilled expectations , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Stimulus repetition affects both strength and synchrony of macaque inferior temporal cortical activity. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Evaluation of a Shape-Based Model of Human Face Discrimination Using fMRI and Behavioral Techniques , 2006, Neuron.

[56]  Caspar M. Schwiedrzik,et al.  High-Level Prediction Signals in a Low-Level Area of the Macaque Face-Processing Hierarchy , 2017, Neuron.

[57]  B. Efron Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 1987 .

[58]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Encoding of Predictable and Unpredictable Stimuli by Inferior Temporal Cortical Neurons , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  R. Tootell,et al.  An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  G. Orban,et al.  Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[63]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Functional Compartmentalization and Viewpoint Generalization Within the Macaque Face-Processing System , 2010, Science.

[64]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2017, Current Biology.

[66]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.