A Probabilistic Account of Logical Metonymy

In this article we investigate logical metonymy, that is, constructions in which the argument of a word in syntax appears to be different from that argument in logical form (e.g., enjoy the book means enjoy reading the book, and easy problem means a problem that is easy to solve). The systematic variation in the interpretation of such constructions suggests a rich and complex theory of composition on the syntax/semantics interface. Linguistic accounts of logical metonymy typically fail to describe exhaustively all the possible interpretations, or they don't rank those interpretations in terms of their likelihood. In view of this, we acquire the meanings of metonymic verbs and adjectives from a large corpus and propose a probabilistic model that provides a ranking on the set of possible interpretations. We identify the interpretations automatically by exploiting the consistent correspondences between surface syntactic cues and meaning. We evaluate our results against paraphrase judgments elicited experimentally from humans and show that the model's ranking of meanings correlates reliably with human intuitions.

[1]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Extracting Paraphrases from a Parallel Corpus , 2001, ACL.

[2]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Inducing a Semantically Annotated Lexicon via EM-Based Clustering , 1999, ACL.

[3]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Forgetting Exceptions is Harmful in Language Learning , 1998, Machine Learning.

[4]  Kathleen McKeown,et al.  Learning Methods to Combine Linguistic Indicators:Improving Aspectual Classification and Revealing Linguistic Insights , 2000, CL.

[5]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Class-Based Probability Estimation Using a Semantic Hierarchy , 2002, CL.

[6]  Hang Li,et al.  Generalizing Case Frames Using a Thesaurus and the MDL Principle , 1995, CL.

[7]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Semi-productive Polysemy and Sense Extension , 1995, J. Semant..

[8]  MerloPaola,et al.  Automatic verb classification based on statistical distributions of argument structure , 2001 .

[9]  Cornelia Maria Verspoor,et al.  Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics , 1997 .

[10]  Masaki Murata,et al.  A Statistical Approach to the Processing of Metonymy , 2000, COLING.

[11]  Z. Vendler.  Adjectives and Nominalizations , 1968 .

[12]  Carson T. Schütze.  The empirical base of linguistics , 2016 .

[13]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Aspectual Coercion and Logical Polysemy , 1995, J. Semant..

[14]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Logical polysemy and aspectual coercion , 1995 .

[15]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[16]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Processing Metonymy- a Domain-Model Heuristic Graph Traversal Approach , 1996, COLING.

[17]  Frank Keller,et al.  Intra-sentential context effects on the interpretation of logical metonymy , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Gavin Burnage.  Celex-a guide for users , 1990 .

[19]  Dan Fass,et al.  met*: A Method for Discriminating Metonymy and Metaphor by Computer , 1991, CL.

[20]  Carson T. Schütze.  The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[21]  Ash Asudeh,et al.  Probabilistic Learning Algorithms and Optimality Theory , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[22]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Enjoy the Paper: Lexicology , 1990, COLING.

[23]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  Automatic Verb Classification Based on Statistical Distributions of Argument Structure , 2001, CL.

[24]  Ann Copestake,et al.  The semi-generative lexicon: limits on lexical productivity , 2001 .

[25]  Michael Collins,et al.  Prepositional Phrase Attachment through a Backed-off Model , 1995, VLC@ACL.

[26]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[27]  Udo Hahn,et al.  On the Interaction of Metonymies and Anaphora , 1997, IJCAI.

[28]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[29]  Ralph Grishman,et al.  NOMLEX: a lexicon of nominalizations , 1998 .

[30]  Frank Keller,et al.  Phonology competes with syntax: experimental evidence for the interaction of word order and accent placement in the realization of Information Structure , 2001, Cognition.

[31]  Jurij D. Apresjan.  REGULAR POLYSEMY , 1974 .

[32]  Frank Keller,et al.  Evaluating Smoothing Algorithms against Plausibility Judgements , 2001, ACL.

[33]  M. Corley,et al.  Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[35]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Pragmatics and word meaning , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[36]  Diana McCarthy,et al.  Using Semantic Preferences to Identify Verbal Participation in Role Switching Alternations , 2000, ANLP.

[37]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Intergrating Symbolic and Statistical Representations: The Lexicon Pragmatics Interface , 1997, ACL.

[38]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  Interpretation as Abduction , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[39]  Wayne Cowart,et al.  Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments , 1997 .

[40]  Marc Light,et al.  Morphological Cues for Lexical Semantics , 1996, ACL.

[41]  P. Resnik.  Selection and information: a class-based approach to lexical relationships , 1993 .

[42]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Measuring Verb Similarity , 2000 .

[43]  Danièle Godard,et al.  Towards a proper treatment of coercion phenomena , 1993, EACL.

[44]  Brian McElree,et al.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition , 2001, Cognition.

[45]  Casimir A. Kulikowski,et al.  Computer Systems That Learn: Classification and Prediction Methods from Statistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning and Expert Systems , 1990 .

[46]  Eric Iverson,et al.  METALLEL: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NON‐LITERAL PHRASE INTERPRETATION 1 , 1992, Comput. Intell..

[47]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  CLAWS4: The Tagging of the British National Corpus , 1994, COLING.

[48]  A. Sorace,et al.  MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LINGUISTIC ACCEPTABILITY , 1996 .

[49]  Steven P. Abney.  Partial parsing via finite-state cascades , 1996, Natural Language Engineering.

[50]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[51]  Milton Lodge,et al.  Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions , 1981 .

[52]  Geoffrey Nunberg,et al.  Transfers of Meaning , 1995, J. Semant..

[53]  Bonnie Lynn Webber.  Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics , 2001 .