Problems with Firm-Led Voluntary Sustainability Schemes: The Case of Direct Trade Coffee

Ensuring sustainable consumption and production is one of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable consumption can be supported through regulatory processes. Voluntary private regulatory schemes claiming to contribute to sustainability are a rapidly growing form of regulation. We study one such voluntary sustainability scheme in order to look at the opportunities and challenges this type of regulatory process poses using Abbot and Snidal’s regulatory standard-setting framework (2009). Specifically, we examine direct trade voluntary schemes in the coffee industry. To do this, we selected six leading direct trade firms in the US and Scandinavia, analyzed firms’ websites in 2015 and 2016 and conducted interviews with four of the firms. We found direct trade as a voluntary scheme was an attempt to market and codify good sourcing practices. US-based founding firms have distanced themselves from the term due to perceived co-optation, which we conceptualize as the failure of industry to self-regulate and argue was enabled by the re-negotiation of standards without the power to enforce or penalize misuse of the term. Firms reacted to co-optation by releasing data to consumers directly; we argue this puts too much responsibility on consumers to monitor and enforce standards. By contrast, Scandinavian firms maintained standards enforced through trademark nationally. Both US and Scandinavian contexts demonstrate a weakness of firm-led agenda-setting for sustainable development in that schemes may be optimized for a particular business concern—in this case quality—rather than to achieve sustainable development goals. This is problematic if schemes are marketed on contribution to the public good when incentives within the scheme are not aligned to produce an optimal result for the public good.

[1]  F. Boons,et al.  Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State of the Art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda , 2013 .

[2]  D. Jaffee Weak Coffee: Certification and Co-Optation in the Fair Trade Movement , 2012 .

[3]  B. Campbell,et al.  Climate Change and Food Systems , 2012 .

[4]  D. Giovannucci,et al.  The State of Sustainable Coffee: A Study of Twelve Major Markets , 2007 .

[5]  U. Hamm,et al.  Information Needs for a Purchase of Fairtrade Coffee , 2015 .

[6]  S. Manning,et al.  The Emergence of a Standards Market: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry , 2012 .

[7]  A. Mol,et al.  Certification of Markets, Markets of Certificates: Tracing Sustainability in Global Agro-Food Value Chains , 2015 .

[8]  E. Wenger Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[9]  G. Auld Assessing Certification as Governance: Effects and Broader Consequences for Coffee , 2010 .

[10]  I. Bateman,et al.  Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies , 2013, Science.

[11]  L. Fulponi,et al.  Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries , 2006 .

[12]  Nicole Gallant,et al.  Why it matters. , 2016, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[13]  C. Bacon,et al.  Are Sustainable Coffee Certifications Enough to Secure Farmer Livelihoods? The Millenium Development Goals and Nicaragua's Fair Trade Cooperatives , 2008 .

[14]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Projected Shifts in Coffea arabica Suitability among Major Global Producing Regions Due to Climate Change , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  Walter Mattli,et al.  CHAPTER ONE. In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics , 2009 .

[16]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[17]  Nicki Lisa Cole,et al.  The Problem with Fair Trade Coffee , 2014 .

[18]  Alex Murdock,et al.  The Nature of Social Innovation , 2012 .

[19]  Danièle Revel,et al.  The Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change , 2011 .

[20]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.

[21]  B. Tellman,et al.  Not Fair Enough: Historic and Institutional Barriers to Fair Trade Coffee in El Salvador , 2011 .

[22]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations , 2012, Nature.

[23]  Patrick Schroeder,et al.  Assessing effectiveness of governance approaches for sustainable consumption and production in China , 2014 .

[24]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  CHAPTER TWO. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State , 2009 .

[25]  P. Läderach,et al.  A bitter cup: climate change profile of global production of Arabica and Robusta coffee , 2015, Climatic Change.

[26]  D. Loorbach Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[27]  Justus von Geibler,et al.  Market-based governance for sustainability in value chains: conditions for successful standard setting in the palm oil sector , 2013 .

[28]  Michele M. Betsill,et al.  Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: key insights from the Earth System Governance Project , 2012 .

[29]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Understanding Governance: pathways to sustainability , 2007 .

[30]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[31]  Angeloantonio Russo,et al.  Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models , 2009 .

[32]  M. Requier-Desjardins,et al.  The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2015, An Insider's Guide to the UN.

[33]  Chris Tollefson,et al.  Setting the Standard: Certification, Governance, and the Forest Stewardship Council , 2008 .

[34]  Xujin Pu,et al.  Voluntary Certification of Agricultural Products in Competitive Markets: The Consideration of Boundedly Rational Consumers , 2016 .