The Uses and Impacts of Mobile Computing Technology in Hot Spots Policing

Background: Recent technological advances have much potential for improving police performance, but there has been little research testing whether they have made police more effective in reducing crime. Objective: To study the uses and crime control impacts of mobile computing technology in the context of geographically focused “hot spots” patrols. Research Design: An experiment was conducted using 18 crime hot spots in a suburban jurisdiction. Nine of these locations were randomly selected to receive additional patrols over 11 weeks. Researchers studied officers’ use of mobile information technology (IT) during the patrols using activity logs and interviews. Nonrandomized subgroup and multivariate analyses were employed to determine if and how the effects of the patrols varied based on these patterns. Results: Officers used mobile computing technology primarily for surveillance and enforcement (e.g., checking automobile license plates and running checks on people during traffic stops and field interviews), and they noted both advantages and disadvantages to its use. Officers did not often use technology for strategic problem-solving and crime prevention. Given sufficient (but modest) dosages, the extra patrols reduced crime at the hot spots, but this effect was smaller in places where officers made greater use of technology. Conclusions: Basic applications of mobile computing may have little if any direct, measurable impact on officers’ ability to reduce crime in the field. Greater training and emphasis on strategic uses of IT for problem-solving and crime prevention, and greater attention to its behavioral effects on officers, might enhance its application for crime reduction.

[1]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  License plate reader (LPR) police patrols in crime hot spots: an experimental evaluation in two adjacent jurisdictions , 2011 .

[2]  C. Lum,et al.  Institutionalizing Place-Based Approaches: Opening ‘Cases’ on Gun Crime Hot Spots , 2015 .

[3]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[4]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Effects of Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime , 2012 .

[5]  Donald G. Dutton,et al.  Mobile Data Access Terminals and Their Implications for Policing , 1984 .

[6]  Edward C. Chao,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2003, Technometrics.

[7]  Bruce Rocheleau,et al.  Evaluating public sector information systems: Satisfaction versus impact , 1993 .

[8]  John E. Eck,et al.  Is Problem-Oriented Policing Effective in Reducing Crime and Disorder? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review , 2010 .

[9]  J. Chan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Police Practices , 2001 .

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[11]  J. Neuhaus,et al.  Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS , 2006 .

[12]  Bruce G. Taylor,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime , 2011 .

[13]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Concentration and Stability of Gun Violence at Micro Places in Boston, 1980–2008 , 2010 .

[14]  Martin J. Zaworski.  Assessing an automated, information -sharing technology in the post "9 -11" era: Do local law enforcement officers think it meets their needs? , 2004 .

[15]  Samuel Nunn,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Information Technology on Problem-Oriented-Policing , 2002, Evaluation review.

[16]  Jay E. Aronson,et al.  Police Field Mobile Computing: Applying the Theory of Task-Technology Fit , 2004 .

[17]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[18]  Bruce G. Taylor,et al.  A randomized test of initial and residual deterrence from directed patrols and use of license plate readers at crime hot spots , 2013 .

[19]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Jay E. Aronson,et al.  The Benefits of Police Field Mobile Computing Realized by Non-Patrol Sections of a Police Department , 2003 .

[21]  P. Albert,et al.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[22]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots , 1995 .

[23]  David Weisburd,et al.  How Much Time Should the Police Spend at Crime Hot Spots? Answers from a Police Agency Directed Randomized Field Trial in Sacramento, California , 2014 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computerized Data-Based Systems and Productivity among Professional Workers: The Case of Detectives , 1985 .

[25]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[26]  G. Marx,et al.  Technological Innovations in Crime Prevention and Policing. A Review of the Research on Implementation and Impact , 2011 .

[27]  S. Bushway,et al.  Trajectories of Crime at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle , 2004 .

[28]  A. Cameron,et al.  Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests , 1986 .

[29]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  The Evidence-Based Policing Matrix , 2011 .

[30]  C. Koper,et al.  Law Enforcement Technology Needs Assessment: Future Technologies to Address the Operational Needs of Law Enforcement , 2009 .

[31]  S. Goldfinch,et al.  Pessimism, Computer Failure, and Information Systems Development in the Public Sector , 2007 .

[32]  M. Brown,et al.  Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology To Advance Knowledge. , 2003 .

[33]  Samuel Nunn.  How capital technologies affect municipal service outcomes: The case of police mobile digital terminals and stolen vehicle recoveries , 1994 .

[34]  David Weisburd,et al.  The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: an experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy , 2011 .

[35]  Geunjoo Lee,et al.  Are Computers Boosting Productivity?: A Test of the Paradox in State Governments , 1999 .

[36]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[37]  Mary Maureen Brown,et al.  Revisiting the IT Productivity Paradox , 2015 .

[38]  W. Pan.  Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations , 2001, Biometrics.

[39]  J. Triplett.  The Solow productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? , 1999 .

[40]  Mary Maureen Brown,et al.  The Benefits and Costs of Information Technology Innovations: An Empirical Assessment of a Local Government Agency , 2001 .

[41]  Cynthia Lum,et al.  The Diffusion of Computerized Crime Mapping in Policing: Linking Research and Practice , 2005 .

[42]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Impact of Mobile Computing Terminals in Police Work , 2003, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[43]  Paul Foley,et al.  eGOVERNMENT AND THE TRANSFORMATION AGENDA , 2009 .

[44]  C. Koper.  Assessing the Practice of Hot Spots Policing , 2014 .

[45]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[46]  L. Giddings.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[47]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Hot spots policing effects on crime , 2012 .

[48]  Matthew J. Hickman.  Local Police Departments, 2003 , 2012 .

[49]  K. Stiroh.  Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say? , 2001 .

[50]  Bill Lehr,et al.  Information technology and its impact on firm-level productivity: evidence from government and private data sources, 1977-1993 , 1999 .

[51]  Luis Garicano,et al.  Information Technology, Organization, and Productivity in the Public Sector: Evidence from Police Departments , 2010, Journal of Labor Economics.

[52]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..