Development of the Pharmacy Safety Climate Questionnaire: a principal components analysis

Objective: To develop, and examine the component structure and internal consistency, of a questionnaire designed to assess safety climate in the community pharmacy setting. Methods: 998 pharmacists working in community pharmacies in England completed the questionnaire. Item selection was determined by principal components analysis (PCA) which also defined the underlying structure of the questionnaire. Scales were constructed from the items that loaded on components and were tested for internal consistency using Cronbach α scores. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine inter-component correlations. Results: A 34-item Pharmacy Safety Climate Questionnaire (PSCQ) was extracted through PCA; seven components were retained which represented the model of choice, and explained 58.3% of the data variance. The components were: investigating and learning from incidents; staffing and management; perceptions of the causes of incidents and reporting; team working; communication; commitment to patient safety; and education and training about safety. The internal consistency for the components was high; Cronbach α scores ranged from 0.67 to 0.88. Conclusions: The PSCQ demonstrated good psychometric properties in terms of its face validity, component structure and internal consistency. Community pharmacies can use this new tool to measure staff attitudes relating to seven safety climate domains, to compare themselves with other pharmacies, to prompt interventions to improve the prevailing safety climate within their organisation, and to measure the effectiveness of these interventions.

[1]  V. Nieva,et al.  Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[2]  J. Stevens,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .

[3]  R Flin,et al.  Measuring safety climate in health care , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[4]  P. Maurette,et al.  [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[5]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparison of Three Approaches , 2001, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[7]  J. Sexton,et al.  Correction: The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: A randomized trial of clinical units [ISRCTN85147255] , 2005, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  Torsten B Neilands,et al.  The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: A randomized trial of clinical units , 2005, BMC health services research.

[9]  W. Weeks,et al.  Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[10]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆ , 2000 .

[11]  James T. Reason,et al.  Achieving a safe culture : theory and practice , 1998 .

[12]  D Parker,et al.  Safety culture assessment in community pharmacy: development, face validity, and feasibility of the Manchester Patient Safety Assessment Framework , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[13]  F. Guldenmund The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[14]  R. Gonzalez Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[15]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[16]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Safety Condition Monitoring: Lessons from Man‐Made Disasters , 1998 .

[17]  A. Glendon,et al.  Perspectives on safety culture , 2000 .