Effect of the interconnected network structure on the epidemic threshold.

Most real-world networks are not isolated. In order to function fully, they are interconnected with other networks, and this interconnection influences their dynamic processes. For example, when the spread of a disease involves two species, the dynamics of the spread within each species (the contact network) differs from that of the spread between the two species (the interconnected network). We model two generic interconnected networks using two adjacency matrices, A and B, in which A is a 2N×2N matrix that depicts the connectivity within each of two networks of size N, and B a 2N×2N matrix that depicts the interconnections between the two. Using an N-intertwined mean-field approximation, we determine that a critical susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) epidemic threshold in two interconnected networks is 1/λ(1)(A+αB), where the infection rate is β within each of the two individual networks and αβ in the interconnected links between the two networks and λ(1)(A+αB) is the largest eigenvalue of the matrix A+αB. In order to determine how the epidemic threshold is dependent upon the structure of interconnected networks, we analytically derive λ(1)(A+αB) using a perturbation approximation for small and large α, the lower and upper bound for any α as a function of the adjacency matrix of the two individual networks, and the interconnections between the two and their largest eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We verify these approximation and boundary values for λ(1)(A+αB) using numerical simulations, and determine how component network features affect λ(1)(A+αB). We note that, given two isolated networks G(1) and G(2) with principal eigenvectors x and y, respectively, λ(1)(A+αB) tends to be higher when nodes i and j with a higher eigenvector component product x(i)y(j) are interconnected. This finding suggests essential insights into ways of designing interconnected networks to be robust against epidemics.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  J. H. Wilkinson The algebraic eigenvalue problem , 1966 .

[4]  A. J. Hall Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[5]  Benny Sudakov,et al.  The Largest Eigenvalue of Sparse Random Graphs , 2001, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[6]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[7]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[8]  R. D’Souza,et al.  Percolation on interacting networks , 2009, 0907.0894.

[9]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Graph Spectra for Complex Networks , 2010 .

[11]  C. Scoglio,et al.  An individual-based approach to SIR epidemics in contact networks. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  M. Baglietto,et al.  Proceedings of the 2012 American Control Conference , 2012 .

[13]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Epidemic thresholds of the Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible model on networks: A comparison of numerical and theoretical results , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Faryad Darabi Sahneh,et al.  Effect of coupling on the epidemic threshold in interconnected complex networks: A spectral analysis , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.