Changing quality of life through the Personal Kaizen approach: a qualitative study

Purpose – Imai defined Kaizen as: “a means of continuing improvement in personal life, home life, social life, and working life. At the workplace, Kaizen means continuing improvement involving everyone – managers and workers alike”. According to Imai, Kaizen can take at least three forms: Kaizen management; Group Kaizen; Individual Kaizen. In this last form, the strength of the continuous improvement of this Japanese management approach is focused on the work of each person as an individual. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore how some people have applied Personal Kaizen to their personal lives in order to improve their quality of life. The research question that drives the study is: How do some people apply Personal Kaizen in order to improve their quality of life?Design/methodology/approach – An exploratory qualitative study was conducted. Using theoretical sampling, three persons who have implemented Personal Kaizen in their daily lives in order to change their quality of life were ident...

[1]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[2]  D.J.H. Newitt,et al.  BEYOND BPR & TQM - MANAGING THROUGH PROCESSES: IS KAIZEN ENOUGH? , 1996 .

[3]  Robert Maurer.  One Small Step Can Change Your Life: The Kaizen Way , 2004 .

[4]  A. Pettigrew.  WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[5]  Daud Normala.  Investigating the Relationship between Quality of Work Life and Organizational Commitment amongst Employees in Malaysian Firms , 2010 .

[6]  J. Ritchie.  Qualitative research practice , 2014 .

[7]  Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park,et al.  Lean-kaizen public service: an empirical approach in Spanish local governments , 2009 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Cycles of organizational change , 1992 .

[9]  Homayoun Hajiran.  Toward a Quality of Life Theory: Net Domestic Product of Happiness , 2006 .

[10]  S. Clark.  Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance , 2000 .

[11]  N. Nayab.  Kaizen: The key to Japan‚s competitive success , 2009 .

[12]  R. S. M. Lau,et al.  A Win-Win Paradigm for Quality of Work Life and Business Performance. [and] Invited Reaction: Comments on Lau and May's Study. , 1998 .

[13]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  Continuous process improvement in Spanish local government , 2009 .

[14]  R. Stake.  The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry1 , 1978 .

[15]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[16]  John Macdonald.  Together TQM and BPR are winners , 1995 .

[17]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Continuous Improvement: Quality Control Circles in Japanese Industry , 1989 .

[18]  L. Araujo,et al.  Case research in purchasing and supply management: Opportunities and challenges , 2007 .

[19]  G. Morgan,et al.  Images of Organizations , 1997 .

[20]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[21]  D. Buchanan.  The Role of Photography in Organization Research , 2001 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.