Machine learning-based placental clusters and their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND Placental abnormalities have been described in clinical convenience samples, with predominately adverse outcomes. Few studies have described placental patterns in unselected samples. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate associations between co-occurring placental features and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a prospective cohort of singletons. METHODS Data were from the Safe Passage study (U.S. and South Africa, 2007-2015). Before 24 weeks' gestation, participants were randomly invited to donate placental tissue at delivery for blinded, standardised pathological examination. We used hierarchical clustering to construct statistically derived groups using 60 placental features. We estimated associations between the placental clusters and select adverse pregnancy outcomes, expressed as unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and robust 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS We selected a 7-cluster model. After collapsing 2 clusters to form the reference group, we labelled the resulting 6 analytic clusters according to the overarching category of their most predominant feature(s): severe maternal vascular malperfusion (n = 117), fetal vascular malperfusion (n = 222), other vascular malperfusion (n = 516), inflammation 1 (n = 269), inflammation 2 (n = 175), and normal (n = 706). Risks for all outcomes were elevated in the severe maternal vascular malperfusion cluster. For instance, in unadjusted analyses, this cluster had 12 times the risk of stillbirth (RR 12.07, 95% CI 4.20, 34.68) and an almost doubling in the risk of preterm delivery (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.27, 2.93) compared with the normal cluster. Small infant size was more common among the abnormal clusters, with the highest unadjusted RRs observed in the fetal vascular malperfusion cluster (small for gestational age birth RR 2.99, 95% CI 2.24, 3.98, head circumference <10th percentile RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.60, 5.12). Upon adjustment for known risk factors, most RRs attenuated but remained >1. CONCLUSION Our study adds to the growing body of epidemiologic research, finding adverse pregnancy outcomes may occur through etiologic mechanisms involving co-occurring placental abnormalities.

[1]  W. Fifer,et al.  Association of Prenatal Exposure to Maternal Drinking and Smoking With the Risk of Stillbirth , 2021, JAMA network open.

[2]  W. Fifer,et al.  Concurrent prenatal drinking and smoking increases risk for SIDS: Safe Passage Study report , 2020, EClinicalMedicine.

[3]  J. Cecatti,et al.  Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond , 2019, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[4]  R. Redline,et al.  Fetal vascular malperfusion, an update , 2018, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[5]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: Risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  J. W. Emerson,et al.  Estimated Placental Volume and Gestational Age , 2017, American Journal of Perinatology.

[7]  K. O'Donoghue,et al.  Abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[8]  C. Parker,et al.  Altered fetal growth, placental abnormalities, and stillbirth , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  S. Oh,et al.  Placental Lesions in Meconium Aspiration Syndrome , 2017, Journal of pathology and translational medicine.

[10]  R. Goldenberg,et al.  Importance of including stillbirth in measures of preterm birth , 2017, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[11]  Siobhan M. Dolan,et al.  Impact of stillbirths on international comparisons of preterm birth rates: a secondary analysis of the WHO multi‐country survey of Maternal and Newborn Health , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  H. Kinney,et al.  The Stillbirth Classification System for the Safe Passage Study , 2017, Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society.

[13]  José Guilherme Cecatti,et al.  The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight , 2017, PLoS medicine.

[14]  J. Biesiada,et al.  Clustering and classical analysis of clinical and placental phenotypes in fetal growth restriction and constitutional fetal smallness. , 2016, Placenta.

[15]  A. Elliott,et al.  Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains , 2016, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[16]  J. Kwon,et al.  Viral Infections During Pregnancy , 2015, American journal of reproductive immunology.

[17]  W. Fifer,et al.  The safe passage study: design, methods, recruitment, and follow-up approach. , 2014, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[18]  N. Sebire,et al.  Systematic review of placental pathology reported in association with stillbirth. , 2014, Placenta.

[19]  J. Biesiada,et al.  Clinicoplacental phenotypes vary with gestational age: an analysis by classical and clustering methods , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  D. Greenbaum,et al.  Utilizing Two-Dimensional Ultrasound to Develop Normative Curves for Estimated Placental Volume , 2013, American Journal of Perinatology.

[21]  J. Biesiada,et al.  Clustering of maternal-fetal clinical conditions and outcomes and placental lesions. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  N. Sebire,et al.  Relationship between placental morphology and histological findings in an unselected population near term , 2011, Virchows Archiv.

[23]  W. Grobman Building a better prediction model. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  G. Donders,et al.  Placental pathology in fetal growth restriction. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[25]  H. Kliman,et al.  Determination of placental weight using two-dimensional sonography and volumetric mathematic modeling. , 2010, American journal of perinatology.

[26]  J. Dodd,et al.  The prevention and treatment of intrauterine growth restriction. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[27]  Christine O Menias,et al.  Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[28]  K. Kalache,et al.  Outcome of 60 neonates who had ARED flow prenatally compared with a matched control group of appropriate‐for‐gestational age preterm neonates , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  J. Graham,et al.  Evaluation of neonates born with intrauterine growth retardation: review and practice guidelines. , 1998, Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association.

[30]  C. Sung,et al.  Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights. , 1996, Pediatric pathology & laboratory medicine : journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology, affiliated with the International Paediatric Pathology Association.

[31]  R. Royall Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators , 1986 .

[32]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[33]  P. Jaccard THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[34]  D. Mckenna,et al.  First‐trimester screening for early and late preeclampsia using maternal characteristics, biomarkers, and estimated placental volume , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  J. Kingdom,et al.  Umbilical cord diameter percentile curves and their correlation to birth weight and placental pathology. , 2013, Placenta.

[36]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .