A unified continuum representation of post-seismic relaxation mechanisms: semi-analytic models of afterslip, poroelastic rebound and viscoelastic flow

We present a unified continuum mechanics representation of the mechanisms believed to be commonly involved in post-seismic transients such as viscoelasticity, fault creep and poroelasticity. The time-dependent relaxation that follows an earthquake, or any other static stress perturbation, is considered in a framework of a generalized viscoelastoplastic rheology whereby some inelastic strain relaxes a physical quantity in the material. The relaxed quantity is the deviatoric stress in case of viscoelastic relaxation, the shear stress in case of creep on a fault plane and the trace of the stress tensor in case of poroelastic rebound. In this framework, the instantaneous velocity field satisfies the linear inhomogeneous Navier's equation with sources parametrized as equivalent body forces and surface tractions. We evaluate the velocity field using the Fourier-domain Green's function for an elastic half-space with surface buoyancy boundary condition. The accuracy of the proposed method is demonstrated by comparisons with finite-element simulations of viscoelastic relaxation following strike-slip and dip-slip ruptures for linear and power-law rheologies. We also present comparisons with analytic solutions for afterslip driven by coseismic stress changes. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed method can be used to model time-dependent poroelastic rebound by adopting a viscoelastic rheology with bulk viscosity and work hardening. The proposed method allows one to model post-seismic transients that involve multiple mechanisms (afterslip, poroelastic rebound, ductile flow) with an account for the effects of gravity, non-linear rheologies and arbitrary spatial variations in inelastic properties of rocks (e.g. the effective viscosity, rate-and-state frictional parameters and poroelastic properties).

[1]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials , 1993 .

[2]  A. Cheng,et al.  Fundamentals of Poroelasticity , 1993 .

[3]  J. Avouac,et al.  Modeling afterslip and aftershocks following the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2007 .

[4]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Frictional Afterslip Following the 2005 Nias-Simeulue Earthquake, Sumatra , 2006, Science.

[5]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Gravitational viscoelastic postseismic relaxation on a layered spherical Earth , 1997 .

[6]  Haluk Ozener,et al.  Seven years of postseismic deformation following the 1999, M = 7.4 and M = 7.2, Izmit-Düzce, Turkey earthquake sequence , 2009 .

[7]  Paul Segall,et al.  Stress and subsidence resulting from subsurface fluid withdrawal in the epicentral region of the 1983 Coalinga earthquake , 1985 .

[8]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[9]  G. Schubert,et al.  Modeling of periodic great earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault: Effects of nonlinear crustal rheology , 1994 .

[10]  Sylvain Barbot,et al.  Three-dimensional models of elastostatic deformation in heterogeneous media, with applications to the Eastern California Shear Zone , 2009 .

[11]  C. Marone LABORATORY-DERIVED FRICTION LAWS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SEISMIC FAULTING , 1998 .

[12]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Implications of deformation following the 2002 Denali, Alaska, earthquake for postseismic relaxation processes and lithospheric rheology , 2006 .

[13]  A. Love A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity , 1892 .

[14]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Poroelastic rebound along the Landers 1992 earthquake surface rupture , 1998 .

[15]  Zhong Lu,et al.  The postseismic response to the 2002 M 7.9 Denali Fault earthquake: Constraints from InSAR 2003-2005 , 2009 .

[16]  Paul Segall,et al.  Earthquakes triggered by fluid extraction , 1989 .

[17]  M. Paterson,et al.  Rheology of synthetic olivine aggregates: Influence of grain size and water , 1986 .

[18]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Rheology of the Upper Mantle: A Synthesis , 1993, Science.

[19]  T. Herring,et al.  Far‐reaching transient motions after Mojave earthquakes require broad mantle flow beneath a strong crust , 2007 .

[20]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[21]  George E. Backus,et al.  Moment Tensors and other Phenomenological Descriptions of Seismic Sources—I. Continuous Displacements , 1976 .

[22]  J. Rice,et al.  Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid‐saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents , 1976 .

[23]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[24]  S. Nemat-Nasser Plasticity: A Treatise on Finite Deformation of Heterogeneous Inelastic Materials , 2004 .

[25]  A. Freed,et al.  Afterslip (and only afterslip) following the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake , 2007 .

[26]  Amos Nur,et al.  Postseismic Viscoelastic Rebound , 1974, Science.

[27]  C. Scholz,et al.  Correction to “On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip” by Chris J. Marone, C.H. Scholz, and Roger Bilham , 1991 .

[28]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Coupled afterslip and viscoelastic flow following the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska earthquake , 2009 .

[29]  W. F. Brace,et al.  Limits on lithospheric stress imposed by laboratory experiments , 1980 .

[30]  Hugo Perfettini,et al.  Postseismic relaxation driven by brittle creep: A possible mechanism to reconcile geodetic measurements and the decay rate of aftershocks, application to the Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan , 2004 .

[31]  Kristine M. Larson,et al.  Frictional Properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, Inferred from Models of Afterslip following the 2004 Earthquake , 2006 .

[32]  John D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Response of well-aquifer systems to Earth tides , 1967 .

[33]  Sylvain Barbot,et al.  Fourier-domain Green's function for an elastic semi-infinite solid under gravity, with applications to earthquake and volcano deformation , 2010 .

[34]  Semih Ergintav,et al.  Time-Dependent Distributed Afterslip on and Deep below the İzmit Earthquake Rupture , 2002 .

[35]  Roland Bürgmann,et al.  Evidence of power-law flow in the Mojave desert mantle , 2004, Nature.

[36]  Kanamori,et al.  Viscoelastic flow in the lower crust after the 1992 landers, california, earthquake , 1998, Science.

[37]  J. Weertman,et al.  High Temperature Creep of Rock and Mantle Viscosity , 1975 .

[38]  H. Kümpel Poroelasticity: parameters reviewed , 1991 .

[39]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Parkfield earthquake: Stress-driven creep on a fault with spatially variable rate-and-state friction parameters , 2009 .

[40]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Mobility of continental mantle: Evidence from postseismic geodetic observations following the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2000 .

[41]  D. Sandwell,et al.  A three-dimensional semianalytic viscoelastic model for time-dependent analyses of the earthquake cycle , 2004 .

[42]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Effect of a compliant fault zone on the inferred earthquake slip distribution , 2008 .

[43]  S. Rani,et al.  Quasi‐static deformation of a poroelastic half‐space with anisotropic permeability by two‐dimensional surface loads , 2007 .

[44]  J. Dieterich Earthquake nucleation on faults with rate-and state-dependent strength , 1992 .

[45]  Christopher H. Scholz,et al.  The brittle-plastic transition and the depth of seismic faulting , 1988 .

[46]  T. Parsons Tectonic stressing in California modeled from GPS observations , 2006 .

[47]  J. Dieterich Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations , 1979 .

[48]  J. Rudnicki Fluid mass sources and point forces in linear elastic diffusive solids , 1986 .

[49]  Paul Segall,et al.  Post-earthquake ground movements correlated to pore-pressure transients , 2003, Nature.

[50]  S. Karato Deformation of Earth Materials: Contents , 2008 .

[51]  Philip G. Meredith,et al.  Time-dependent brittle creep in Darley Dale sandstone , 2009 .

[52]  B. Evans,et al.  Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments , 1995 .

[53]  C. Scholz Earthquakes and friction laws , 1998, Nature.

[54]  Y. Fialko,et al.  Mechanics of active magmatic intraplating in the Rio Grande Rift near Socorro, New Mexico , 2010 .

[55]  Sylvain Barbot,et al.  Seismic and geodetic evidence for extensive, long-lived fault damage zones , 2009 .

[56]  S. Kirby Rheology of the lithosphere , 1983 .

[57]  Herbert F. Wang,et al.  Transient stress-coupling between the 1992 Landers and 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquakes , 2002 .

[58]  S. Karato Deformation of Earth Materials: An Introduction to the Rheology of Solid Earth , 2008 .

[59]  Yuri Fialko,et al.  Evidence of fluid-filled upper crust from observations of postseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers earthquake , 2004 .

[60]  Sylvain Barbot,et al.  Space geodetic investigation of the coseismic and postseismic deformation due to the 2003 Mw7.2 Altai earthquake: Implications for the local lithospheric rheology , 2008 .

[61]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Viscoelastic‐gravitational deformation by a rectangular thrust fault in a layered Earth , 1982 .

[62]  J. C. Savage Viscoelastic‐coupling model for the earthquake cycle driven from below , 2000 .

[63]  J. Rice,et al.  Rate and state dependent friction and the stability of sliding between elastically deformable solids , 2001 .

[64]  S. Kirby,et al.  Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics , 1987 .

[65]  R. Reilinger,et al.  Evidence for postseismic viscoelastic relaxation following the 1959 M = 7.5 Hebgen Lake, Montana, Earthquake , 1986 .

[66]  John R. Rice,et al.  Crustal Earthquake Instability in Relation to the Depth Variation of Frictional Slip Properties , 1986 .