Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography

Undersampled projection reconstruction (PR) is investigated as an alternative method for MRA (MR angiography). In conventional 3D Fourier transform (FT) MRA, resolution in the phase‐encoding direction is proportional to acquisition time. Since the PR resolution in all directions is determined by the readout resolution, independent of the number of projections (Np), high resolution can be generated rapidly. However, artifacts increase for reduced Np. In X‐ray CT, undersampling artifacts from bright objects like bone can dominate other tissue. In MRA, where bright, contrast‐filled vessels dominate, artifacts are often acceptable and the greater resolution per unit time provided by undersampled PR can be realized. The resolution increase is limited by SNR reduction associated with reduced voxel size. The hybrid 3D sequence acquires fractional echo projections in the kx–ky plane and phase encodings in kz. PR resolution and artifact characteristics are demonstrated in a phantom and in contrast‐enhanced volunteer studies. Magn Reson Med 43:91–101, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Image reconstruction from finite numbers of projections , 1973 .

[2]  W. Edelstein,et al.  Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Ching-Ming Lai,et al.  Zeugmatography by Reconstruction from Projections , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Peter M. Joseph,et al.  Experimental simulation evaluation of ECG-gated heart scans with a small number of views. , 1983 .

[5]  C. Lai,et al.  Reconstructing NMR images from projections under inhomogeneous magnetic field and non-linear field gradients. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  3-D Reconstruction of the Heart from Few Projections: A Practical Implementation of the McKinnon-Bates Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  D. Noll,et al.  Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[8]  G H Glover,et al.  Projection Reconstruction Techniques for Reduction of Motion Effects in MRI , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D C Noll,et al.  MR imaging of lung parenchyma: a solution to susceptibility. , 1992, Radiology.

[10]  J L Duerk,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise, resolution, and bias function analysis of asymmetric sampling with zero‐padded magnitude ft reconstruction , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  J R MacFall,et al.  MR microscopy of the rat lung using projection reconstruction , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  X Hu,et al.  Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Volker Rasche,et al.  Continuous radial data acquisition for dynamic MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  R Frayne,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  N J Pelc,et al.  Temporal resolution improvement in dynamic imaging , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  T L Chenevert,et al.  The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k‐space acquisition order on three‐dimensional MR angiography image quality , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  V Rasche,et al.  Catheter tracking using continuous radial MRI , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  L W Hedlund,et al.  MR microimaging of the lung using volume projection encoding , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  B K Rutt,et al.  Polar sampling in k‐space: Reconstruction effects , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  D L Parker,et al.  Optimized visualization of vessels in contrast enhanced intracranial MR angiography , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  P M Joseph,et al.  Sampling errors in projection reconstruction MRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Rapid tip tracking with MRI by a limited projection reconstruction technique , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Richard Frayne,et al.  3D Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced MR DSA: Advantages and tradeoffs , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  J. Debbins,et al.  Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J Hennig,et al.  Reduced circular field‐of‐view imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Undersampled Projection Imaging for Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced 3 D MR Angiography ( PR-TRICKS ) , 1999 .

[27]  Volker Rasche,et al.  Projection–reconstruction reduces FOV imaging , 1999 .