Statistical Analysis of Decoding Performances of Diverse Populations of Neurons

A central theme in computational neuroscience is determining the neural correlates of efficient and accurate coding of sensory signals. Diversity, or heterogeneity, of intrinsic neural attributes is known to exist in many brain areas and is thought to significantly affect neural coding. Recent theoretical and experimental work has argued that in uncoupled networks, coding is most accurate at intermediate levels of heterogeneity. Here we consider this question with data from in vivo recordings of neurons in the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish subject to the same realization of noisy stimuli; we use a generalized linear model (GLM) to assess the accuracy of (Bayesian) decoding of stimulus given a population spiking response. The long recordings enable us to consider many uncoupled networks and a relatively wide range of heterogeneity, as well as many instances of the stimuli, thus enabling us to address this question with statistical power. The GLM decoding is performed on a single long time series of data to mimic realistic conditions rather than using trial-averaged data for better model fits. For a variety of fixed network sizes, we generally find that the optimal levels of heterogeneity are at intermediate values, and this holds in all core components of GLM. These results are robust to several measures of decoding performance, including the absolute value of the error, error weighted by the uncertainty of the estimated stimulus, and the correlation between the actual and estimated stimulus. Although a quadratic fit to decoding performance as a function of heterogeneity is statistically significant, the result is highly variable with low R2 values. Taken together, intermediate levels of neural heterogeneity are indeed a prominent attribute for efficient coding even within a single time series, but the performance is highly variable.

[1]  Il Memming Park,et al.  Encoding and decoding in parietal cortex during sensorimotor decision-making , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  R. H. Myers Generalized Linear Models: With Applications in Engineering and the Sciences , 2001 .

[3]  N. Urban,et al.  Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Cheng Ly,et al.  Variable synaptic strengths controls the firing rate distribution in feedforward neural networks , 2016, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[5]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Implications of Neuronal Diversity on Population Coding , 2006, Neural Computation.

[6]  Jonathan W. Pillow,et al.  Likelihood-based approaches to modeling the neural code , 2007 .

[7]  Shreejoy J Tripathy,et al.  Intermediate intrinsic diversity enhances neural population coding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Functional diversity among sensory neurons from efficient coding principles , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[10]  Josef Ladenbauer,et al.  Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data , 2018, bioRxiv.

[11]  Kyle P. Wendling,et al.  Firing rate distributions in a feedforward network of neural oscillators with intrinsic and network heterogeneity. , 2019, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[12]  Chengjie G Huang,et al.  Temporal decorrelation by SK channels enables efficient neural coding and perception of natural stimuli , 2016, Nature Communications.

[13]  André Longtin,et al.  Modeling cancelation of periodic inputs with burst-STDP and feedback , 2013, Neural Networks.

[14]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  From Spiking Neuron Models to Linear-Nonlinear Models , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Feedback and Feedforward Control of Frequency Tuning to Naturalistic Stimuli , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Bastian Gain control in the electrosensory system mediated by descending inputs to the electrosensory lateral line lobe , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Cheng Ly,et al.  Firing rate dynamics in recurrent spiking neural networks with intrinsic and network heterogeneity , 2015, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[18]  Jan Vrbik,et al.  Population moments of sampling distributions , 2005, Comput. Stat..

[19]  André Longtin,et al.  Inference of a Mesoscopic Population Model from Population Spike Trains , 2020, Neural Computation.

[20]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Neural Heterogeneities Determine Response Characteristics to Second-, but Not First-Order Stimulus Features , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[23]  J Ahn,et al.  Heterogeneity of intrinsic biophysical properties among cochlear nucleus neurons improves the population coding of temporal information. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Maurice J. Chacron,et al.  Activation of Parallel Fiber Feedback by Spatially Diffuse Stimuli Reduces Signal and Noise Correlations via Independent Mechanisms in a Cerebellum-Like Structure , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  L. Maler,et al.  Nonstationary Stochastic Dynamics Underlie Spontaneous Transitions between Active and Inactive Behavioral States , 2017, eNeuro.

[26]  J F Mejias,et al.  Optimal heterogeneity for coding in spiking neural networks. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[28]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[29]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Introduction to time series and forecasting , 1998 .

[30]  Edward Challis,et al.  Fisher and Shannon Information in Finite Neural Populations , 2012, Neural Computation.

[31]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Model-Based Decoding, Information Estimation, and Change-Point Detection Techniques for Multineuron Spike Trains , 2011, Neural Computation.

[32]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Frequency-Tuned Cerebellar Channels and Burst-Induced LTD Lead to the Cancellation of Redundant Sensory Inputs , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Neural heterogeneity and efficient population codes for communication signals. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Shanmugam Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting , 1997 .

[35]  M. Chacron,et al.  Neuronal On- and Off-type heterogeneities improve population coding of envelope signals in the presence of stimulus-induced noise , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Valentin Dragoi,et al.  Efficient coding in heterogeneous neuronal populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  André Longtin,et al.  Learning Contrast-Invariant Cancellation of Redundant Signals in Neural Systems , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  The Effect of Noise Correlations in Populations of Diversely Tuned Neurons , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.