Innate recognition of water bodies in echolocating bats

In the course of their lives, most animals must find different specific habitat and microhabitat types for survival and reproduction. Yet, in vertebrates, little is known about the sensory cues that mediate habitat recognition. In free flying bats the echolocation of insect-sized point targets is well understood, whereas how they recognize and classify spatially extended echo targets is currently unknown. In this study, we show how echolocating bats recognize ponds or other water bodies that are crucial for foraging, drinking and orientation. With wild bats of 15 different species (seven genera from three phylogenetically distant, large bat families), we found that bats perceived any extended, echo-acoustically smooth surface to be water, even in the presence of conflicting information from other sensory modalities. In addition, naive juvenile bats that had never before encountered a water body showed spontaneous drinking responses from smooth plates. This provides the first evidence for innate recognition of a habitat cue in a mammal.

[1]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Learning the ecological niche , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Richard A. Holland,et al.  A nocturnal mammal, the greater mouse-eared bat, calibrates a magnetic compass by the sun , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Kishkinev,et al.  Acoustic information as a distant cue for habitat recognition by nocturnally migrating passerines during landfall , 2008 .

[5]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Acoustic mirror effect increases prey detection distance in trawling bats , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[6]  G. Kerth,et al.  Roosting together, foraging apart: information transfer about food is unlikely to explain sociality in female Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  How Different Types of Natal Experience Affect Habitat Preference , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J. Metz,et al.  Speciation: more likely through a genetic or through a learned habitat preference? , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  From spatial orientation to food acquisition in echolocating bats , 2003 .

[10]  S. Rossiter,et al.  Relatedness structure and kin-biased foraging in the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Echolocation by Insect-Eating Bats , 2001 .

[12]  T. Marquès-Bonet,et al.  Rivers as possible landmarks in the orientation flight of Miniopterus schreibersii , 2000 .

[13]  M. Fenton,et al.  Relationships between external morphology and foraging behaviour: bats in the genus Myotis , 2002 .

[14]  P. Sorensen,et al.  Importance of the olfactory sense to migratory sea lampreys Petromyzon marinus seeking riverine spawning habitat , 2010 .

[15]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species , 2004, Nature.

[16]  B. Grant,et al.  Habitat selection and ecological speciation in Galápagos warbler finches (Certhidea olivacea and Certhidea fusca) , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  P. Narins,et al.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Matthias O. Franz,et al.  Plant Classification from Bat-Like Echolocation Signals , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  M. Ryan,et al.  Social Transmission of Novel Foraging Behavior in Bats: Frog Calls and Their Referents , 2006, Current Biology.

[21]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[22]  H. Aldridge.  Flight kinematics and energetics in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with reference to the influence of ground effect , 1988 .

[23]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European 'trawling' bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[24]  R. Arlettaz.  Habitat selection as a major resource partitioning mechanism between the two sympatric sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii , 1999 .

[25]  M. Murakami,et al.  Effect of emergent aquatic insects on bat foraging in a riparian forest. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  A. Ghazanfar,et al.  Is neocortex essentially multisensory? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  H. Aldridge,et al.  Morphology echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats , 1987 .

[28]  Gareth Jones,et al.  The evolution of echolocation in bats. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  J. Stamps,et al.  The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  P. Adamík,et al.  Experimental evidence for species-specific habitat preferences in two flycatcher species in their hybrid zone , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[31]  F. Bretschneider,et al.  Prey detection in trawling insectivorous bats: duckweed affects hunting behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  Classification of natural textures in echolocation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.