The examiner's ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second‐trimester fetal examination

To determine whether training and experience in performing ultrasound examinations are factors that influence the prenatal detection of congenital heart defects (CHDs) in a non‐selected population, in order to evaluate and improve the current training program.

[1]  R. Chaoui,et al.  The four‐chamber view: four reasons why it seems to fail in screening for cardiac abnormalities and suggestions to improve detection rate , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  D E Grobbee,et al.  Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in normal pregnancy. , 1996, Circulation.

[3]  F. Faggiano,et al.  Accuracy of routine ultrasonography in screening heart disease prenatally , 1997, Prenatal diagnosis.

[4]  C. Bull,et al.  Current and potential impact of fetal diagnosis on prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK , 1999, The Lancet.

[5]  E. Tegnander,et al.  Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non‐selected population of 30 149 fetuses—detection rates and outcome , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  A. Kim,et al.  Three‐vessel view of the fetal upper mediastinum: an easy means of detecting abnormalities of the ventricular outflow tracts and great arteries during obstetric screening , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  G. D'ottavio,et al.  Fetal heart screening in low‐risk pregnancies , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  B. Thilaganathan,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects , 2002, Heart.

[9]  O. Heinonen,et al.  Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy , 1990, The Lancet.

[10]  H. Grandjean,et al.  Short‐term outcome of isolated and associated congenital heart defects in relation to antenatal ultrasound screening , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  D. Sidi,et al.  A Close Collaboration Between Obstetricians and Pediatric Cardiologists Allows Antenatal Detection of Severe Cardiac Malformations by Two-Dimensional Echocardiography , 1986 .

[12]  S. Levi.  Mass screening for fetal malformations: the Eurofetus study , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  S. Korones,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease in 56,109 Births Incidence and Natural History , 1971, Circulation.

[14]  O. J. Johansen,et al.  Prenatal detection of heart defects at the routine fetal examination at 18 weeks in a non‐selected population , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  E. Tegnander,et al.  Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with congenital heart defects , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  P. Hohlfeld,et al.  Screening for foetal malformations: performance of routine ultrasonography in the population of the Swiss Canton of Vaud. , 2001, Swiss medical weekly.

[17]  T. Angtuaco,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac anomalies: a practical approach using two basic views. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  L. Allan.  A practical approach to fetal heart scanning. , 2000, Seminars in perinatology.

[19]  J. Wladimiroff,et al.  Isolated major congenital heart disease , 2001 .

[20]  H. Grandjean,et al.  The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  A. Sotiriadis,et al.  Routine obstetrical ultrasound at 18-22 weeks: our experience on 7,236 fetuses. , 1999, Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

[22]  M. Tynan,et al.  Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease. , 1986, British medical journal.

[23]  D. Linker,et al.  Incorporating the four‐chamber view of the fetal heart into the second‐trimester routine fetal examination , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  C. Stoll,et al.  Evaluation and evolution during time of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by routine fetal ultrasonographic examination. , 2002, Annales de genetique.

[25]  Jan Marek,et al.  Recommendations for the practice of fetal cardiology in Europe , 2004, Cardiology in the Young.

[26]  R. Tenconi,et al.  Detection of Congenital Anomalies by Fetal Ultrasonographic Examination across Europe , 2002, Public Health Genomics.

[27]  S. Hunter,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the northern region of England: benefits of a training programme for obstetric ultrasonographers , 2000, Heart.

[28]  F. Chan,et al.  Factors influencing the prenatal detection of structural congenital heart diseases , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  L. Allan.  Manual of Fetal Echocardiography , 1986 .

[30]  C. Stoll,et al.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.

[31]  B. Backe.  [Routine ultrasonography in obstetric care in Norway, 1994]. , 1997, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[32]  G. Sharland.  Routine fetal cardiac screening: what are we doing and what should we do? , 2004, Prenatal diagnosis.

[33]  D. Hagler,et al.  Guidelines for physician training in fetal echocardiography: recommendations of the Society of Pediatric Echocardiography Committee on Physician Training. , 1990, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[34]  Joni K. Evans,et al.  A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  J. Hegesh,et al.  Extended fetal echocardiographic examination for detecting cardiac malformations in low risk pregnancies. , 1992, BMJ.

[36]  C. Comstock.  What to expect from routine midtrimester screening for congenital heart disease. , 2000, Seminars in perinatology.

[37]  R. Chaoui,et al.  Three cross‐sectional planes for fetal color Doppler echocardiography , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[38]  A. Gilchrist.  Congenital Heart Disease , 1948, Edinburgh medical journal.

[39]  A. Cook.  The spectrum of fetal cardiac malformations , 2001, Cardiology in the Young.

[40]  L. Allan,et al.  Screening for congenital heart disease prenatally. Results of a 2½‐year study in the South East Thames Region , 1992 .

[41]  E. Garne,et al.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.