The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task.

Abstract Both an opinion survey and an experimental study were conducted. The survey revealed that substantial majorities of those polled believed (a) that a defendant's character and previous history should influence jurors' decision (79%) and (b) that the defendant's physical appearance should not bias these decisions (93%). The hypothesis, derived from a reinforcement model of interpersonal attraction and previous research on physical appearance, was that attractive defendants would be more positively evaluated than unattractive ones despite the seeming irrelevance of appearance to judicial decisions. The results of a simulated jury task were that physically attractive defendants were evaluated with less certainty of guilt ( p p p

[1]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[2]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  D. Byrne,et al.  Cognitive certainty and affective neutrality as a function of stimulus homogeneity-heterogeneity , 1971 .

[4]  D. Byrne,et al.  Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. , 1970 .

[5]  N. Anderson,et al.  Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction. , 1973 .

[6]  K. Dion,et al.  Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  D. Byrne,et al.  Informational versus Affective Determinants of Interpersonal Attraction , 1975 .

[8]  R. Lawson.  Relative Effectiveness of One-Sided and Two-Sided Communications in Courtroom Persuasion , 1970 .

[9]  P. Meldman,et al.  The Jury Method: Some Correlates of Persuading , 1970 .

[10]  D Byrne,et al.  The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. , 1968, Journal of personality.

[11]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Cognitive structure of neutral attitudes , 1971 .

[12]  M. Kaplan.  Dispositional effects and weight of information in impression formation. , 1971 .

[13]  D. Byrne.  When research paradigms converge: Confrontation or integration? , 1973 .

[14]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[15]  E. Posavac,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and confidence of attraction ratings as a function of number of attitudes and attitude similarity , 1971 .

[16]  D. Byrne,et al.  The defendant's dilemma: effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Lawson.  The Law of Primacy in the Criminal Courtroom. , 1969 .

[18]  J. Freedman,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXPECTED FAMILIARITY WITH ARGUMENTS UPON OPINION CHANGE AND SELECTIVE EXPOSURE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  E. Aronson,et al.  The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors , 1969 .

[20]  John Hogarth,et al.  Sentencing as a Human Process , 1973 .

[21]  R. S. Albert,et al.  Jury behavior as a function of the prestige of the foreman and the nature of leadership. , 1958 .

[22]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.