Fast prediction of transonic aeroelastic stability and limit cycles

The exploitation of computational fluid dynamics for aeroelastic simulations is mainly based on time-domain simulations. There is an intense research effort to overcome the computational cost of this approach. Significant aeroelasticeffectsdrivenbynonlinearaerodynamicsincludethetransonic flutterdipandlimit-cycleoscillations.The paper describes the use of Hopf bifurcation and center manifold theory to compute flutter speeds and limit-cycle responses of wings in transonic flow when the aerodynamics are modeled by the Euler equations. The cost of the calculations is comparable to steady-state calculations based on computational fluid dynamics. The paper describes twomethodsfor findingstabilityboundariesandthenanapproachtoreducingthefull-ordersystemtotwodegreesof freedom in the critical mode. Details of the three methods are given, including the calculation of first, second, and thirdJacobiansandthesolutionofsparselinearsystems.ResultsfortheAGARDwing,asupercriticaltransporttype of wing, and the limit-cycle response of the Goland wing are given. Nomenclature A = Jacobian matrix of R with respect to w B, C = second and third Jacobian operators h = (scalar) increment for finite differences F = quadratic and higher terms in R G = Taylor coefficients of the residual restricted to the critical eigenspace H = Taylor coefficients of the residual restricted to the noncritical eigenspace f = convective flux discretization kij = coefficients in center manifold expansion of y P = right eigenvector of A, P1 � iP2 Q = left eigenvector of A, Q1 � iQ2 qs = constant scaling vector for the augmented system R = residual vector v = vector for the matrix-free product w = vector of unknowns y = part of w in the noncritical eigenspace z = part of w in the critical eigenspace � t = time step � i = sequence of eigenvalues in the inverse power method � = bifurcation parameter (dynamic pressure) ! = frequency of critical eigenvalue or shift for the inverse power method Subscripts

[1]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme , 1974 .

[2]  S. Eisenstat,et al.  Variational Iterative Methods for Nonsymmetric Systems of Linear Equations , 1983 .

[3]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Upwind schemes and boundary conditions with applications to Euler equations in general geometries , 1983 .

[4]  A. Jameson Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings , 1991 .

[5]  R. Seydel Practical Bifurcation and Stability Analysis , 1994 .

[6]  Sp Fiddes,et al.  A three-dimensional moving mesh method for the calculation of unsteady transonic flows , 1995, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[7]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme , 1997 .

[8]  R. Britt,et al.  Simulation of Non-Linear Transonic Aeroelastic Behavior on the B-2 , 1999 .

[9]  P. Beran,et al.  Hopf-Bifurcation Analysis of Airfoil Flutter at Transonic Speeds , 1996 .

[10]  B. Richards,et al.  Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers , 2000 .

[11]  Germaine Stanislasse Laure Goura Time marching analysis of flutter using computational fluid dynamics , 2001 .

[12]  Reid Melville Nonlinear simulation of F-16 aeroelastic instability , 2001 .

[13]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Transonic Aeroelasticity Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Reduced-Order Models , 2001 .

[14]  H. Tsai,et al.  Unsteady Flow Calculations with a Parallel Multiblock Moving Mesh Algorithm , 2001 .

[15]  Jeffrey V. Zweber,et al.  Predictions of Store-Induced Limit-Cylce Oscillations Using Euler and Navier-Stokes Fluid Dynamics , 2003 .

[16]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Extrapolation effects on coupled CFD-CSD simulations , 2003 .

[17]  Daniel L. Maxwell,et al.  In-flight wing deformation characteristics during limit-cycle oscillations , 2003 .

[18]  Michael Henshaw,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic fluid-structure interaction solutions in the case of a highly flexible modern transport aircraft wing , 2003 .

[19]  V. ZweberJ.,et al.  INFLUENCE OF TIP STORE MASS LOCATION ON WING LIMIT-CYCLE OSCILLATION N.S , 2003 .

[20]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Extrapolation effects on coupled computational fluid dynamics/computational structural dynamics simulations , 2003 .

[21]  Gregory W. Brown,et al.  Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid–structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter , 2003 .

[22]  S. P. Spekreijse,et al.  Simulation of limit cycle oscillation of fighter aircraft at moderate angle of attack , 2003 .

[23]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  A Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Flutter Prediction Methods: A Summary of PUMA DARP Aeroelastic Results , 2004 .

[24]  Jeffrey V. Zweber,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Store-Induced Limit-Cycle Oscillation , 2004 .

[25]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Hopf Bifurcation Calculations for a Symmetric Airfoil in Transonic Flow , 2004 .

[26]  P. Beran,et al.  Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics , 2004 .

[27]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Direct Aeroelastic Bifurcation Analysis of a Symmetric Wing Based on Euler Equations , 2005 .

[28]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Aeroelastic calculations for the hawk aircraft using the euler equations , 2005 .

[29]  David J. Lucia,et al.  Aeroelastic System Development Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Volterra Theory , 2003 .

[30]  Ken Badcock,et al.  A Reduced Order Model for Damping Derived from CFD Based Aeroelastic Simulations , 2006 .

[31]  Philip S. Beran,et al.  Analysis of Store Effects on Limit-Cycle Oscillation , 2006 .

[32]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Treatment of Complex Configurations for Flutter Calculations , 2006 .

[33]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Aeroelastic analysis through linear and non-linear methods: a summary of flutter prediction in the PUMA DARP , 2006, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[34]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  An Investigation of the Sensitivity of F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset and Limit Cycle Oscillations to Uncertainties , 2006 .