Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas

1. Anonymous. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 987 (2010). 2. Plosila, W.H. Econ. Dev. Q. 18, 113–126 (2004). 3. Stayn, S. BNA Med. Law Pol. Rep. 5, 718–725 (2006). 4. Lomax, G. & Stayn, S. BNA Med. Law Pol. Rep. 7, 695–698 (2008). 5. Levine, A.D. Public Adm. Rev. 68, 681–694 (2008). 6. Levine, A.D. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 865–866 (2006). 7. McCormick, J.B., Owen-Smith, J. & Scott, C.T. Cell Stem Cell 4, 107–110 (2009). 8. Fossett, J.W., Ouellette, A.R., Philpott, S., Magnus, D. & Mcgee, G. Hastings Cent. Rep. 37, 24–35 (2007). 9. Mintrom, M. Publius 39, 606–631 (2009). 10. Scott, C.T., McCormick, J.B. & Owen-Smith, J. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 696–697 (2009). 11. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006). Foundation and the Georgia Research Alliance, and Georgia Tech. They thank J. Walsh at Georgia Tech for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. They also appreciate the assistance they received with data collection from officials in various state stem cell agencies. A.D.L. would also like to thank A. Jakimo, whose comment at a meeting of the Interstate Alliance on Stem Cell Research inspired collection of these data. stem cell programs, as well as similar state programs supporting other areas of science, is uncertain. The analysis here suggests that state stem cell funding programs are sufficiently large and established that simply ending the programs, at least in the absence of substantial investment in the field by other funding sources, could have deleterious effects. Such action would fail to capitalize on the initial efforts of scientists who have been drawn to the field of stem cell research by state programs and leave many stem cell scientists suddenly searching for funding to continue their research. Large-scale state funding for basic research is a relatively new phenomenon, and many questions remain about the impact of these programs on the development of scientific fields and the careers of scientists. The influence of state funding programs on the distribution of research publications, the acquisition of future external funding, the creation of new companies and the translation of basic research into medical practice, for instance, are important unanswered questions. Similarly, comparing state funding programs with federal funding programs as well as foundations could offer new insight into the relative priorities of different funding bodies and the extent to which their funding portfolios overlap or are distinct. We hope the analysis presented here and the public release of the underlying database will inspire additional analysis of state science funding programs generally and state-funded stem cell science in particular.