Assessments of GHG emission reduction scenarios of different levels and different short-term pledges through macro- and sectoral decomposition analyses

Macro- and sectoral-decomposition analyses were conducted using emission reduction scenarios from a global energy-system model. Emission reduction scenarios with targets of 550ppm CO2eq and 450ppm CO2eq, which consider variations in short-term emission fixes, up until 2030, based on extensions of the Copenhagen pledges, were selected from the AMPERE scenarios. All of the assessed emission reduction scenarios are technologically feasible through radical transformations in energy systems. Within the power sector, improvement of CO2 intensity requires wide deployment of carbon-dioxide capture and storage, nuclear power, and renewable energies. In end-use sectors, not only energy intensity improvements but also CO2 intensity improvements must be achieved by switching from fossil fuels to decarbonized energy by means of CO2 intensity improvements on the energy supply side. The feasibility of improvements in CO2 and energy intensities differs between sectors according to the types of mitigation options employed. The required carbon prices are $183/tCO2 for the 550ppm CO2eq target and $645/tCO2 for the 450ppm CO2eq target. When the short-term emission reduction is fixed at the level set by extensions of the Copenhagen pledges, long-term emission reductions by 2050 are more difficult to achieve because rapid and radical transformation of energy systems is required between 2030 and 2050.

[1]  Y. Kaya Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth : Interpretation of proposed scenarios , 1989 .

[2]  Keigo Akimoto,et al.  Diffusion of energy efficient technologies and CO2 emission reductions in iron and steel sector , 2007 .

[3]  Keigo Akimoto,et al.  Global emission reductions through a sectoral intensity target scheme , 2008 .

[4]  Keigo Akimoto,et al.  International comparisons of energy efficiency in power, steel, and cement industries , 2012 .

[5]  Osamu Akashi,et al.  Technological feasibility and costs of achieving a 50 % reduction of global GHG emissions by 2050: mid- and long-term perspectives , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[6]  Tsutomu Asoh,et al.  *JAMA Guideline for In-Vehicle Display Systems (*Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association) , 2005 .

[7]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[8]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Consistent assessments of pathways toward sustainable development and climate stabilization , 2012 .

[9]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Analysis of CCS Diffusion for CO2 Emission Reduction Considering Technology Diffusion Barriers in the Real World , 2013 .

[10]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals , 2014 .

[11]  Keigo Akimoto,et al.  Global emission reductions through a sectoral intensity target scheme , 2008 .

[12]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 , 2009 .

[13]  Giorgio Simbolotti,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2008 , 2008 .

[14]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Assessment of Copenhagen pledges with long-term implications , 2012 .

[15]  Masanobu Kii,et al.  Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost , 2010 .

[16]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets , 2011 .