Metapopulation Genetics and the Evolution of Dispersal

A Markovian extinction model that takes into account age structure of local populations allows consideration of the effects of demography and successional dynamics on the evolution of migration. Analytical expressions for the evolutionarily stable (ES) rates of dispersal are given for cases in which newly recolonized sites attain carrying capacity within a single season. Using a low-fecundity numerical model, we find that an increase of the level of site saturation increases the dispersal rate. Ecological successions and unequal local extinction rates between newly colonized sites and established populations strongly affect the ES dispersal rate. The frequency of genetic modifiers that enhance the rate of dispersal evolves negative correlations with deme age, with high-migration genotypes predominant among colonizers while progressively declining in frequency as a deme ages. This suggests that between-deme selection (colonization) favors migrants while within-deme selection favors low dispersers, which allows the coexistence of types with different dispersal rates. Because of the interaction between the two levels of selection, the relation between the ES dispersal rate and the deme maximal lifetime is nonmonotone. We suggest that life-history traits other than dispersal might also experience antagonistic selective forces at the between- and within-deme levels.

[1]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Differential Dispersal of Self-Fertilized and Outcrossed Progeny in Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dispersal in stable habitats , 1977, Nature.

[3]  P. Gouyon,et al.  The genetics of transient populations: Research at the metapopulation level. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  H. Dingle,et al.  VARIATION IN BODY SIZE AND FLIGHT PERFORMANCE IN MILKWEED BUGS (ONCOPELTUS) , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  R. Holt.  Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[6]  I. Olivieri,et al.  Seed Dimorphism for Dispersal : Physiological, Genetic and Demographical Aspects , 1985 .

[7]  S. Levin,et al.  Evolutionary stability of plant communities and the maintenance of multiple dispersal types , 1991 .

[8]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Dispersal in patchy environments: The effects of temporal and spatial structure , 1991 .

[9]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Distribution of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: Evidence for a Metapopulation Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Selective Interactions of Dispersal, Dormancy, and Seed Size as Adaptations for Reducing Risk in Variable Environments , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[12]  R. Campbell.  Note on Migration Modification , 1982, American Naturalist.

[13]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[14]  S. Harrison,et al.  Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation , 1991 .

[15]  C. Horvitz,et al.  Seed dispersal and environmental heterogeneity in a neotropical herb: a model of population and patch dynamics , 1986 .

[16]  O. Diekmann,et al.  The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations , 1986 .

[17]  M. Feldman,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL IN A MODEL OF MIXED SELFING AND RANDOM MATING , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: Lessons from coupled logistic equations , 1993 .

[19]  S. Tuljapurkar,et al.  Migration in variable environments: exploring life-history evolution using structured population models. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Dispersal strategies in patchy environments , 1984 .

[21]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal , 1983 .

[22]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Models of patch dynamics in tropical forests. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  R. Vance.  The effect of dispersal on population size in a temporally varying environment , 1980 .

[24]  V. Kaitala.  Evolutionary stable migration in salmon : a simulation study of homing and staying , 1990 .

[25]  Michael L. Johnson,et al.  Evolution of Dispersal: Theoretical Models and Empirical Tests Using Birds and Mammals , 1990 .

[26]  M. Feldman,et al.  7. The Reduction Principle For Genetic Modifiers Of The Migration Rate , 1989 .

[27]  L. V. Van Valen.  GROUP SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL , 1971, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: a brief his-tory and conceptual domain , 1991 .

[29]  P. A. Peroni.  Seed size and dispersal potential of Acer rubrum (Aceraceae) samaras produced by populations in early and late successional environments , 1994 .

[30]  H. Comins.  Evolutionarily stable strategies for localized dispersal in two dimensions. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  R. Lande,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management , 1987 .

[32]  W. Bond,et al.  Competition between Two Shrub Species: Dispersal Differences and Fire Promote Coexistence , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[33]  K. Clay.  ENVIRONMENTAL AND GENETIC DETERMINANTS OF CLEISTOGAMY IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF THE GRASS DANTHONIA SPICATA , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  D. Mccauley.  Extinction, Colonization, and Population Structure: A Study of a Milkweed Beetle , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[35]  W. Sousa.  The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities , 1984 .

[36]  H. Dingle,et al.  VARIATION IN BODY SIZE AND FLIGHT PERFORMANCE IN MILKWEED BUGS (ONCOPELTUS) , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  R M May,et al.  Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[39]  I. Noble,et al.  Dispersal, Variability, and Transient Niches: Species Coexistence in a Uniformly Variable Environment , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Dispersal Strategies and Annual Plant Species Coexistence in a Structured Landscape , 1994 .

[41]  A. Hastings,et al.  Within‐Patch Dynamics in a Metapopulation , 1989 .

[42]  U. Motro.  Optimal rates of dispersal II. Diploid populations , 1982 .

[43]  M J Wade,et al.  Group selection on a quantitative character. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  M. Gadgil.  Dispersal: Population Consequences and Evolution , 1971 .

[45]  F. B. Christiansen.  On Conditions for Evolutionary Stability for a Continuously Varying Character , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[46]  P. Taylor,et al.  Dispersal Rates Under Variable Patch Density , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[47]  M. Feldman,et al.  Selection for migration modification. , 1973, Genetics.

[48]  Dov Kollwr,et al.  STUDIES ON THE ECOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AMPHICARPY IN GYMNARRHENA MICRANTHA (COMPOSITAE) , 1964 .