Participatory Forest Management: A Route to Poverty Reduction?

SUMMARY This paper presents the results of a three-year action research project, which investigated the impacts of participatory forest management (PFM) on poverty. Beginning with an analysis of over 30 cases reported in the literature, the project went on to undertake field research in Kenya, Tanzania and Nepal, three countries representing very different stages in and approaches to the implementation of PFM. PFM typically provides a new decision-making forum and may reroute previously direct household benefits to the user group or community level. Regardless of PFM model, the research shows that the key to providing rural people with a sustainable and equitably distributed stream of net benefits is to adopt poverty reduction as a stated objective, allow for both subsistence and commercial use of forest products, design appropriate PFM institutions, introduce transparent and equitable means of benefit-sharing, and provide sufficient support during establishment of PFM initiatives.

[1]  A. Mishra,et al.  Learning from self-initiated community forest management in Orissa, India , 2002 .

[2]  Karen Moore,et al.  The Chronic Poverty Report 2004-05 , 2004 .

[3]  S. Mvondo.  Forestry income management and poverty reduction: empirical findings from Kongo, Cameroon , 2006 .

[4]  N. Timsina.  Promoting social justice and conserving montane forest environments: a case study of Nepal's community forestry programme , 2003 .

[5]  J. Soussan,et al.  Institutional Development of Forest User Groups in Nepal: Processes and Indicators , 2003 .

[6]  B. M. K. Lukama.  Participatory forest management: a strategy for sustainable forest management in Africa: a case study of the Chinyunyu Community Forestry Project, Zambia. , 2000 .

[7]  S. Mahanty,et al.  A Fair Share? Sharing the Benefits and Costs of Collaborative Forest Management , 2009 .

[8]  I. Scoones,et al.  Participatory Learning and Action: A trainer's guide , 1995 .

[9]  A. Newton,et al.  Commercialization of non-timber forest products: factors influencing success - lessons learned from Mexico and Bolivia and policy implications for decision-makers. A final output of project R7925 , 2006 .

[10]  I. Nhantumbo,et al.  Community Based Natural Resources Management in Mozambique: A Theoretical or Practical Strategy for Local Sustainable Development? The Case Study of Derre Forest Reserve , 2003 .

[11]  D. Klooster.  Institutional choice, community, and struggle: a case study of forest co-management in Mexico. , 2000 .

[12]  Kate Schreckenberg,et al.  From supervising subjects to supporting citizens: recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa , 2002 .

[13]  John Soussan,et al.  Impacts of Community Forestry on Livelihoods in the Middle Hills of Nepal , 2003 .

[14]  M. Hobley.  Where in the world is there pro-poor forest policy and tenure reform? , 2007 .

[15]  P. J. Daugherty,et al.  What Makes Community Forest Management Successful: A Meta-Study From Community Forests Throughout the World , 2006 .

[16]  Amy Glasmeier,et al.  Understanding community forestry: a qualitative meta-study of the concept, the process, and its potential for poverty alleviation in the United States case , 2005 .

[17]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Participatory Forest Management and Poverty Reduction: a review of the evidence , 2005 .

[18]  N. Lustig,et al.  World development report 2000/2001 : attacking poverty , 2001 .

[19]  V. G. Vyamana.  Participatory Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania: Who Benefits? , 2009 .

[20]  R. Neumann,et al.  Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research , 2000 .

[21]  B. Pokharel,et al.  Forests and People's Livelihood: Benefiting the Poor from Community Forestry , 2004 .

[22]  O. Springate-Baginski,et al.  Forest Management and Utilization Under Community Forestry , 2003 .

[23]  N. Burgess,et al.  Seeing the wood for the trees: an assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on forest condition in Tanzania , 2008, Oryx.

[24]  W. Sunderlin.  Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam: An assessment of the potential , 2006 .

[25]  J. Fox,et al.  Hanging in the balance : equity in community-based natural resource management in Asia , 2006 .

[26]  J. Ribot,et al.  Environmental governance in Africa : green and black gold in rural Cameroon : natural resources for local governance, justice and sustainability , 2006 .

[27]  I. Guijt,et al.  The myth of community : gender issues in participatory development , 1998 .

[28]  A. Pain,et al.  High value forests, hidden economies and elite capture: Evidence from forest user groups in Nepal's Terai , 2006 .

[29]  D. Edmunds,et al.  Local forest management: the impacts of devolution policies , 2004 .

[30]  Renata Lok-Dessallien.  Review of Poverty Concepts and Indicators by , 2022 .

[31]  J. Gronow,et al.  Recent experience in collaborative forest management: a review paper , 2005 .

[32]  D. Brockington.  Forests, Community Conservation, and Local Government Performance: The Village Forest Reserves of Tanzania , 2007 .

[33]  Y. Malla.  Why aren't Poor People Benefiting More from Community Forestry? , 2003 .

[34]  M. McDermott.  Equity First or Later? How US Community-Based Forestry Distributes Benefits , 2009 .

[35]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview , 2005 .

[36]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: A Reality Check , 2007 .