The SOLO Taxonomy as a means of shaping and assessing learning in higher education

This paper is a discussion of the use of the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) Taxonomy (Biggs & Collis, 1982, 1989; Biggs, 1991, 1992a, 1992b; Boulton‐Lewis, 1992, 1994) as a means of developing and assessing higher order thinking in Higher Education. It includes a summary of the research into its use to date as an instrument to find out what students know and believe about their own learning, to assess entering knowledge in a discipline, to present examples of structural organization of knowledge in a discipline, to provide models of levels of desired learning outcomes, and in particular to assess learning outcomes. A proposal is made for further research.

[1]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Gillian Boulton-Lewis,et al.  Tertiary students' knowledge of their own learning and a SOLO Taxonomy , 1994 .

[3]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[4]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[5]  E. V. Rossum,et al.  The Relationship between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome. , 1984 .

[6]  Richard Lempert,et al.  The Effects of Graduate Training on Reasoning: Formal Discipline and Thinking About Everyday-Life Events , 1988 .

[7]  John Biggs,et al.  Towards a Model of School-based Curriculum Development and Assessment Using the SOLO Taxonomy , 1989 .

[8]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations , 1992 .

[9]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[10]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[11]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[12]  John Biggs.  Teaching for learning : the view from cognitive psychology , 1991 .

[13]  Michael Prosser,et al.  The “How” and “What” of learning physics , 1989 .

[14]  David Watkins,et al.  Depth of processing and the quality of learning outcomes , 1983 .

[15]  G. Boulton‐Lewis,et al.  Teachers as adult learners: their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching , 1996 .

[16]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[17]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  New Directions in Educational Assessment , 1989 .

[18]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Student evaluations of teaching and courses: Student learning approaches and outcomes as criteria of validity , 1991 .

[19]  Philip Taylor,et al.  A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching , 1994 .

[20]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[21]  S. Norris.  Can We Test Validly for Critical Thinking? , 1989 .

[22]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Educational Testing , 1989 .