Integrating psycholinguistic and motor control approaches to speech production: where do they meet?

To integrate psycholinguistic and motor control approaches to speech production, Hickok proposes the hierarchical state feedback control (HSFC) model. Here, I contest the direct mapping between lemmas and syllable motor programmes proposed by Hickok, and argue that this mapping proceeds indirectly via morphemic and phonological word representations. The results of computer simulations suggest that phoneme-based mapping is a viable alternative to the lemma-based mapping of the HSFC model.

[1]  Takao Fushimi,et al.  The functional unit in phonological encoding: evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English , 2010, Cognition.

[3]  Greg Gibson,et al.  Rare and common variants: twenty arguments , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  G. Hickok Computational neuroanatomy of speech production , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[7]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese , 2015 .

[8]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech , 2007, Cognition.

[9]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[10]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[11]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing , 2014, Language and cognitive processes.

[12]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). , 2004, Psychological review.

[13]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.