How Schools Change Reforms: Redefining Reform Success and Failure

Because schools change reforms as much as reforms change schools, judging an innovation's success or failure has been, and is, no easy task. I identify three common criteria used by policymaking elites (effectiveness, popularity, and fidelity) and two less common ones used by practitioners (adaptability and longevity) and apply them to the two-decade-old Effective Schools school reform. What emerged as crucial in evaluating school reforms is what criteria are being used to make judgments, whose criteria they are, and how schools change reforms as they are implemented. The example of Effective Schools challenges policymakers and researchers to become more explicit about which criteria they employ to judge success and to understand how the journey of school reform is a story of constant adaptation that ultimately undermines the common criteria generally used to judge success and failure.

[1]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Between Systemic Reforms and the Mathematics and Science Classroom: The Dynamics of Innovation, Implementation, and Professional Learning , 1997 .

[2]  Rodney T. Ogawa The Institutional Sources of Educational Reform: The Case of School-Based Management , 1994 .

[3]  A. Ornstein,et al.  School Effectiveness and National Reform , 1993 .

[4]  T. Chenoweth Emerging National Models of Schooling for At-Risk Students , 1992 .

[5]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Chapter 1: Policy and Practice: The Relations Between Governance and Instruction , 1992 .

[6]  D. Ball,et al.  Relations Between Policy and Practice: A Commentary , 1990 .

[7]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Success for All: First-Year Outcomes of a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming Urban Education , 1990 .

[8]  H. Kliebard Vocational Education as Symbolic Action: Connecting Schooling With the Workplace1 , 1990 .

[9]  James P. Comer,et al.  Educating Poor Minority Children. , 1988 .

[10]  James G. Emshoff,et al.  Innovation in Education and Criminal Justice: Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Program Effectiveness , 1987 .

[11]  R. Murnane Improving Education Indicators and Economic Indicators: The Same Problems? , 1987 .

[12]  Lawrence C. Stedman It's Time We Changed the Effective Schools Formula. , 1987 .

[13]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  School Effectiveness: Checking Progress and Assumptions and Developing a Role for State and Federal Government , 1985, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[14]  Gail R. Meister,et al.  Turbulence in American Secondary Schools: What Reforms Last?* , 1985 .

[15]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Beyond Standardization: State Standards and School Improvement , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[16]  Larry Cuban Transforming the Frog into a Prince: Effective Schools Research, Policy, and Practice at the District Level. , 1984 .

[17]  I. Scheffler On the Education of Policymakers. , 1984 .

[18]  James J. Fennessey,et al.  Science or Reform: Some Questions about the Effective Schools Model. , 1983 .

[19]  Marshall S. Smith,et al.  Effective Schools: A Review , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[20]  W. Firestone,et al.  Prescriptions for Effective Elementary Schools Don't Fit Secondary Schools. , 1982 .

[21]  Michael Cohen Effective Schools: Accumulating Research Findings. , 1982 .

[22]  Ronald R. Edmonds Effective Schools for the Urban Poor , 1979 .

[23]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. 4: The Findings in Review. , 1975 .