A novel signature incorporating lipid metabolism- and immune-related genes to predict the prognosis and immune landscape in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) is a highly malignant tumor with high metastasis and recurrence rates. Due to the relation between lipid metabolism and the tumor immune microenvironment is constantly being elucidated, this work is carried out to produce a new prognostic gene signature that incorporates immune profiles and lipid metabolism of LIHC patients. Methods We used the “DEseq2” R package and the “Venn” R package to identify differentially expressed genes related to lipid metabolism (LRDGs) in LIHC. Additionally, we performed unsupervised clustering of LIHC patients based on LRDGs to identify their subgroups and immuno-infiltration and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on the subgroups. Next, we employed multivariate, LASSO and univariate Cox regression analyses to determine variables and to create a prognostic profile on the basis of immune- and lipid metabolism-related differential genes (IRDGs and LRDGs). We separated patients into low- and high-risk groups in accordance with the best cut-off value of risk score. We conducted Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis as a function of time as well as Survival Analysis to evaluate this signature’s prognostic value. We incorporated the clinical characteristics of patients into the risk model to obtain a nomogram prognostic model. GEO14520 and ICGC-LIRI JP datasets were employed to externally confirm the accuracy and robustness of signature. The gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were applied for investigating the underlying mechanisms. Immune infiltration analysis was implemented to examine the differences in immune between both risk groups. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-SEQ) was utilized to characterize the genes that were involved in the distribution of signature and expression characteristics of different LIHC cell types. The patients’ sensitivity in both risk groups to commonly used chemotherapeutic agents and semi-inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the drugs was assessed using the GDSC database. On the basis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the two groups, the CMAP database was adopted for the prediction of potential small-molecule compounds. Small-molecule compounds were molecularly docked with prognostic markers. Lastly, we investigated the prognostic gene expression levels in normal and LIHC tissues with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR). Results We built and verified a prognostic signature with seven genes that incorporated immune profiles and lipid metabolism. Patients were classified as low- and high-risk groups depending on their prognostic profiles. The overall survival (OS) was markedly lower in the high-risk group as compared to low-risk group. Time-dependent ROC curves more precisely predicted patients' survival at 1, 3 and 5 years; the area under the ROC curve was 0.81 (1 year), 0.75 (3 years) and 0.77 (5 years). The DCA curves showed the value of the prognostic genes in this signature for clinical applications. We included the patients' clinical characteristics in the risk model for both multivariate and univariate Cox regression analyses, and the findings revealed that the risk model represents an independent factor that influences OS in LIHC patients. With immune analysis, GSVA and GSEA, we identified that there are remarkable differences between the two risk groups in immune pathways, lipid metabolism, tumor development, immune cell infiltration and immune microenvironment, response to immunotherapy, and sensitivity to chemotherapy. Moreover, those with higher risk scores presented greater sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic agents. Experiments in vitro further elucidated the roles of SPP1 and FLT3 in the LIHC immune microenvironment. Furthermore, four small-molecule drugs that could target LIHC were screened. In vitro qRT-PCR , IHC revealed that the SPP1,KIF18A expressions were raised in LIHC in tumor samples, whereas FLT3,SOCS2 showed the opposite trend. Conclusions We developed and verified a new signature comprising immune- and lipid metabolism-associated markers and to assess the prognosis and the immune status of LIHC patients. This signature can be applied to survival prediction, individualized chemotherapy, and immunotherapeutic guidance for patients with liver cancer. This study also provides potential targeted therapeutics and novel ideas for the immune evasion and progression of LIHC.

[1]  V. Costa,et al.  The Multifaceted Role of Annexin A1 in Viral Infections , 2023, Cells.

[2]  B. Cai,et al.  Identification of lipid metabolism-associated genes as prognostic biomarkers based on the immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma , 2022, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[3]  A. Kudriaeva,et al.  Neglected, yet significant role of FOXP1 in T-cell quiescence, differentiation and exhaustion , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[4]  Z. Fang,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of a novel signature incorporating lipid metabolism and immune-related genes for assessing prognosis and immune landscape in lung adenocarcinoma , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[5]  C. de Graaf,et al.  Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Ligands of G Protein–Coupled Receptors: What Can Molecular Docking Do for You? , 2021, Pharmacological Reviews.

[6]  R. Govindan,et al.  Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2021, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[7]  Xinqian Yang,et al.  A prognostic model based on seven immune-related genes predicts the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma , 2021, BioData Mining.

[8]  Yu Wang,et al.  Recent progress in nanomedicine for enhanced cancer chemotherapy , 2021, Theranostics.

[9]  L. Qin,et al.  Lipid metabolism in cancer progression and therapeutic strategies , 2020, MedComm.

[10]  X. Sang,et al.  Construction of a lipid metabolism‐related and immune‐associated prognostic signature for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2020, Cancer medicine.

[11]  Fan Zhang,et al.  TISCH: a comprehensive web resource enabling interactive single-cell transcriptome visualization of tumor microenvironment , 2020, bioRxiv.

[12]  S. Dubey,et al.  Metabolic reprograming of tumor-associated macrophages , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[13]  Li Xu,et al.  High FLT3 Levels May Predict Sorafenib Benefit in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Jie Zhu,et al.  Establishment of a Prognostic Model Using Immune-Related Genes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2020, Frontiers in Genetics.

[15]  Giuseppina Augimeri,et al.  Modulating Tumor-Associated Macrophage Polarization by Synthetic and Natural PPARγ Ligands as a Potential Target in Breast Cancer , 2020, Cells.

[16]  Sheng Li,et al.  Genome‐wide analysis reveals alcohol dehydrogenase 1C and secreted phosphoprotein 1 for prognostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma , 2019, Journal of cellular physiology.

[17]  Luca Pinzi,et al.  Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[18]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  Recent Developments and Therapeutic Strategies against Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2019, Cancer research.

[19]  Furong Li,et al.  Impaired dendritic cell functions in lung cancer: a review of recent advances and future perspectives , 2019, Cancer communications.

[20]  A. Singal,et al.  Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Best Practice and Future Direction. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[21]  F. Redegeld,et al.  Role of Mast Cells in Shaping the Tumor Microenvironment , 2019, Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology.

[22]  Guihua Chen,et al.  CXCR6 deficiency ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury by reducing the recruitment and cytokine production of hepatic NKT cells in a mouse model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. , 2019, International immunopharmacology.

[23]  A. Villanueva Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  K. Koike,et al.  Lipid Metabolic Reprogramming in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2018, Cancers.

[25]  X. Liu,et al.  Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[26]  R. Schulte‐Hermann,et al.  Deviations of the immune cell landscape between healthy liver and hepatocellular carcinoma , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[27]  J. Bruix,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma , 2018, The Lancet.

[28]  A. Sjölander,et al.  M2‐like macrophages induce colon cancer cell invasion via matrix metalloproteinases , 2017, Journal of cellular physiology.

[29]  M. Zaidi,et al.  TAMeless traitors: macrophages in cancer progression and metastasis , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  Angela N. Brooks,et al.  A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles , 2017, Cell.

[31]  S. Sakaguchi,et al.  Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy , 2016, Cell Research.

[32]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Destabilization of Fatty Acid Synthase by Acetylation Inhibits De Novo Lipogenesis and Tumor Cell Growth. , 2016, Cancer research.

[33]  M. Kasahara,et al.  Clinicopathological relevance of kinesin family member 18A expression in invasive breast cancer. , 2016, Oncology letters.

[34]  Q. Xia,et al.  Role of Osteopontin in Liver Diseases , 2016, International journal of biological sciences.

[35]  Haiyang Xie,et al.  The suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2) inhibits tumor metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma , 2016, Tumor Biology.

[36]  Xiaoyu Liang,et al.  Tumor cell-derived microparticles polarize M2 tumor-associated macrophages for tumor progression , 2016, Oncoimmunology.

[37]  Bin Shang,et al.  Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[38]  S. Fouad,et al.  Plasma Osteopontin Level in Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2015, Hepatitis monthly.

[39]  K. Knutson,et al.  Tumor-Infiltrating Dendritic Cells in Cancer Pathogenesis , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[40]  Hao Xu,et al.  Comparison osteopontin vs AFP for the diagnosis of HCC: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology.

[41]  L. Qin,et al.  Osteopontin is a promoter for hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis: a summary of 10 years of studies , 2014, Frontiers of Medicine.

[42]  Justin Guinney,et al.  GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-Seq data , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  Sridhar Ramaswamy,et al.  Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  Ze-Guang Han,et al.  STC2 is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes cell proliferation and migration in vitro , 2012, BMB reports.

[45]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Dysregulated lipid metabolism in cancer. , 2012, World journal of biological chemistry.

[46]  M. Malumbres,et al.  Killing cells by targeting mitosis , 2012, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[47]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[48]  G. Weber,et al.  Categorical meta-analysis of Osteopontin as a clinical cancer marker. , 2011, Oncology reports.

[49]  Ziwei Gu,et al.  A small molecule that blocks fat synthesis by inhibiting the activation of SREBP. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[50]  Linda Wordeman,et al.  The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[51]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[52]  O. Lantz,et al.  CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells. , 2005, Blood.

[53]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  X. Wang,et al.  Predicting hepatitis B virus–positive metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas using gene expression profiling and supervised machine learning , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[55]  F. Levi-Schaffer,et al.  Mast cells and histamine enhance the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells. , 2012, Lung cancer.

[56]  P. Lund,et al.  Growth Factors, Cytokines, Cell Cycle Molecules Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-2 Gene Disruption Promotes Apc Tumorigenesis and Activator Protein-1 Activation , 2010 .

[57]  C. Ling,et al.  Inhibitory effect of recombinant adenovirus carrying melittin gene on hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.