Size effects in the testing of fibre-composite materials

Abstract The effect of test specimen size on the unnotched strength of continuous fibre reinforced composites is considered. The different fundamental failure mechanisms of fibre direction tension, fibre direction compression, and matrix dominated transverse tension and shear are discussed in turn. The available experimental data is reviewed, concentrating on tests on unidirectional carbon and glass fibre/epoxy materials. The results show a tendency for the strength to decrease with increasing specimen volume for all failure modes. Size effects in tensile failure have been found in both tensile and flexural tests, and from higher strengths in bending than in tension. The magnitude of the effect is consistent with Weibull moduli in the range 13–29 for the materials considered. There are some indications that the size effect in tension diminishes with increasing scale. Lower compressive strengths have been found in large components than in small test coupons, and attributed to defects. Size effects observed in compressive failure in bending are believed to be mainly due to the stress gradient through the thickness. There are large size effects for matrix dominated failures, and Weibull strength theory fits the data reasonably well. It is important to consider the effect of specimen size on strength when carrying out tests on composites, and to take account of it when using strength data from small coupons in the design of large structures.

[1]  Stephane Mespoulet.  Through-thickness test methods for laminated composite materials , 1998 .

[2]  C. Zweben.  Designer's corner: Is there a size effect in composites? , 1994 .

[3]  Isaac M Daniel,et al.  Analysis of Fracture Probabilities in Nonuniformly Stressed Brittle Materials , 1964 .

[4]  Isaac M Daniel,et al.  Is there a thickness effect on compressive strength of unnotched composite laminates? , 1999 .

[5]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Size Effects in Interlaminar Tensile and Shear Strength of Unidirectional Glass Fibre/Epoxy , 1996 .

[6]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Analysis of Shear Instability in Compression Due to Fibre Waviness , 1993 .

[7]  R. E. Bullock,et al.  Strength Ratios of Composite Materials in Flexure and in Tension , 1974 .

[8]  S. W. Yurgartis.  Measurement of small angle fiber misalignments in continuous fiber composites , 1987 .

[9]  M. Hyer,et al.  Effects of Layer Waviness on the Compression Strength of Thermoplastic Composite Laminates , 1993 .

[10]  M. Wisnom,et al.  Evaluating Weibull Parameters for Transverse Cracking in Cross-Ply Laminates , 1997 .

[11]  H. Wagner.  Statistical Concepts in the Study of Fracture Properties of Fibres and Composites , 1989 .

[12]  F. Hauser,et al.  Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials , 1976 .

[13]  R. Pipes,et al.  Strength size effect of laminated composites , 1995 .

[14]  Isaac M Daniel,et al.  Composite Materials: Testing and Design , 1982 .

[15]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Reduction in tensile and flexural strength of unidirectional glass fibre-epoxy with increasing specimen size , 1997 .

[16]  S. Lewis,et al.  Effect of specimen size on the strength scaling of GFRP laminates , 1994 .

[17]  J. E. Bailey,et al.  Constrained cracking in glass fibre-reinforced epoxy cross-ply laminates , 1978 .

[18]  R. H. Moore,et al.  A Survey of the Literature on the Size Effect on Material Strength. , 1978 .

[19]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Relationship between strength variability and size effect in unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy , 1991 .

[20]  K. Shivakumar,et al.  Interlaminar tension strength of graphite/epoxy composite laminates , 1994 .

[21]  R. Potter.  On the mechanism of tensile fracture in notched fibre reinforced plastics , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  M. G. Bader,et al.  Investigation of the transverse properties of a unidirectional carbon/epoxy laminate: Part 2—Laminate properties , 1994 .

[23]  N. J. Pagano,et al.  Interlaminar Stresses in Composite Laminates Under Uniform Axial Extension , 1970 .

[24]  J. Morton,et al.  Damage and Failure Mechanisms in Scaled Angle-Ply Laminates , 1993 .

[25]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  The Effect of Fibre Waviness on the Relationship between Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Unidirectional Composites , 1994 .

[26]  M. Wisnom,et al.  Compressive Failure Due to Shear Instability: Experimental Investigation of Waviness and Correlation with Analysis , 1996 .

[27]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Specimen size effects in the tensile failure strain of an epoxy adhesive , 1998 .

[28]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  Scaling of Structural Failure , 1997 .

[29]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  3-D Finite Element Analysis of Curved Beams in Bending , 1996 .

[30]  W. Cui,et al.  Failure mechanisms in three and four point short beam bending tests of unidirectional glass/epoxy , 1992 .

[31]  T. O'Brien.  Characterization of delamination onset and growth in a composite laminate , 1982 .

[32]  J. Morton,et al.  Scaling Effects in Sublaminate-Level Scaled Composite Laminates , 1998 .

[33]  C. Gardin,et al.  Structure effect and microbuckling , 1996 .

[34]  J. Whitney,et al.  The relationship between tensile strength and flexure strength in fiber-reinforced composites , 1980 .

[35]  C. Zweben.  The Flexural Strength of Aramid Fiber Composites , 1978 .

[36]  Karen E. Jackson,et al.  Workshop on Scaling Effects in Composite Materials and Structures , 1994 .

[37]  Anna K. Johnson,et al.  Pressurized Ring Test for Composite Pressure Vessel Hoop Strength and Stiffness Evaluation , 1995 .

[38]  M. Wisnom,et al.  Reduction in compressive strain to failure with increasing specimen size in pin-ended buckling tests , 1997 .

[39]  A. Miyase.  Transverse tensile strength anisotropy in thick filament wound ring composites , 1984 .

[40]  Nobuo Takeda,et al.  In situ observation and probabilistic prediction of microscopic failure processes in CFRP cross-ply laminates , 1994 .

[41]  S. Leigh Phoenix,et al.  Statistics for the strength and size effects of microcomposites with four carbon fibers in epoxy resin , 1996 .

[42]  Reza Ghaffarian,et al.  Size effect and strength variability of unidirectional composites , 1984 .

[43]  M. Hojo,et al.  Influence of clamping method on tensile properties of unidirectional CFRP in 0° and 90° directions — round robin activity for international standardization in Japan , 1994 .

[44]  M. G. Bader,et al.  Transverse Ply Cracking in Cross-Ply CFRP Laminates—Initiation or Propagation Controlled? , 1997 .

[45]  W. Weibull.  A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[46]  S. Salpekar,et al.  Scale effects on the transverse tensile strength of graphite epoxy composites , 1992 .

[47]  H. Yoshida,et al.  Statistical approach to the relationship between ILSS and void content of CFRP , 1986 .

[48]  J. Reeder.  Stitching vs. a Toughened Matrix: Compression Strength Effects , 1995 .

[49]  M. Wisnom,et al.  Constrained buckling tests show increasing compressive strain to failure with increasing strain gradient , 1997 .

[50]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  The Relationship between Tensile and Flexural Strength of Unidirectional Composites , 1992 .

[51]  D. Adams,et al.  Evaluation of the transverse flexure test method for composite materials , 1990 .

[52]  Tsu-Wei Chou,et al.  The effect of strain gage size on measurement errors in textile composite materials , 1998 .

[53]  Klaus Friedrich,et al.  Application of fracture mechanics to composite materials , 1989 .

[54]  John Morton,et al.  Scale Effects in the Response and Failure of Fiber Reinforced Composite Laminates Loaded in Tension and in Flexure , 1992 .

[55]  D. Cohen.  Application of Reliability and Fiber Probabilistic Strength Distribution Concepts to Composite Vessel Burst Strength Design , 1991 .

[56]  Bernard D. Coleman,et al.  On the strength of classical fibres and fibre bundles , 1958 .

[57]  M. S. Starkey,et al.  Use of Weibull statistics to quantify specimen size effects in fatigue of GRP , 1988 .

[58]  Wisnom,et al.  Tensile Strength of Unidirectional Carbon Fibre-Epoxy from Tapered Specimens , 1994 .

[59]  D. C. Phillips,et al.  The dependence of the strength of carbon fibres on length , 1979 .

[60]  A. S. Argon,et al.  Fracture of Composites , 1972 .

[61]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Effect of End-Tab Design on Tension Specimen Stress Concentrations , 1985 .

[62]  N. Fleck,et al.  Microbuckle initiation in fibre composites : A finite element study , 1995 .

[63]  D. C. Phillips,et al.  The effect of specimen size on the strength of cfrp , 1978 .

[64]  B. W. Rosen,et al.  Tensile failure of fibrous composites. , 1964 .

[65]  D. J. Wilkins,et al.  Kink-Band Failure Analysis of Thick Composites in Compression , 1993 .

[66]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Effect of shear stresses in indirect compression tests of unidirectional carbon fiber/epoxy , 1991 .

[67]  S. L. Phoenix,et al.  The Chain-of-Bundles Probability Model for the Strength of Fibrous Materials II: A Numerical Study of Convergence , 1978 .

[68]  W. Cui,et al.  Effect of Specimen Size on Interlaminar Shear Strength of Unidirectional Carbon Fibre Epoxy , 1994 .

[69]  E. Odom,et al.  Specimen size effect during tensile testing of an unreinforced polymer , 1992 .

[70]  K. Jackson.  Scaling effects in the flexural response and failure of composite beams , 1992 .

[71]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  The effect of specimen size on the bending strength of unidirectional carbon fibre-epoxy , 1991 .