Stylistic Inversion In English: A Reconsideration

We argue that the phenomenon described and discussed in the literature as locative or stylistic inversion in English is actually a conflation of twoquite different constructions: on the one hand, light inversion (LI), inwhich the postverbal NP element can be phonologically and structurallyextremely simple, possibly consisting of a single name, and on the otherhand heavy inversion (HI), where the postverbal element is heavy in thesense of Heavy NP Shift.1 We present evidence that the preverbal PP in LI patterns with subjects but the PP in HI is a syntactic topic, usinga variety of tests which distinguish A-positions from Ā-positions.Other significant differences between HI and LI, such as the classesof verbs which support these two constructions respectively, and thedifferential behavior of HI and LI with respect to adverbial placement,provide support for interpreting HI as a case of Heavy NP Shiftapplying to subject constituents.

[1]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A RECONSIDERATION OF DATIVE MOVEMENTS , 1971 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[3]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[4]  Kyle Brian Johnson,et al.  A case for movement , 1985 .

[5]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  Locality in linguistic theory , 1984 .

[6]  D. Pesetsky.  COMPLEMENTIZER - TRACE PHENOMENA AND THE NOMINATIVE ISLAND CONDITION , 1982 .

[7]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[8]  P. Sells.  Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns , 1984 .

[9]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[10]  Richard S. Kayne.  Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[11]  R. Levine,et al.  On focus inversion: syntactic valence and the role of a SUBCAT list , 1989 .

[12]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[13]  T. Hoekstra,et al.  UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATION , 1990 .

[14]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[15]  P. Culicover,et al.  English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .

[16]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[17]  Peter W. Culicover.  Evidence against ECP accounts of the 'that-t' effect , 1993 .

[18]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[19]  English focus constructions and the theory of grammar By Michael S. Rochemont and Peter W. Culicover (review) , 2015 .

[20]  P. Coopmans,et al.  Where Stylistic and Syntactic Processes Meet: Locative Inversion in English , 1989 .