Variation in Information Needs and Quality: Implications for Public Health Surveillance and Biomedical Informatics

Understanding variation among users' information needs and the quality of information in an electronic system is important for informaticians to ensure data are fit-for-use in answering important questions in clinical and public health. To measure variation in satisfaction with currently reported data, as well as perceived importance and need with respect to completeness and timeliness, we surveyed epidemiologists and other public health professionals across multiple jurisdictions. We observed consensus for some data elements, such as county of residence, which respondents perceived as important and felt should always be reported. However information needs differed for many data elements, especially when comparing notifiable diseases such as chlamydia to seasonal (influenza) and chronic (diabetes) diseases. Given the trend towards greater volume and variety of data as inputs to surveillance systems, variation of information needs impacts system design and practice. Systems must be flexible and highly configurable to accommodate variation, and informaticians must measure and improve systems and business processes to accommodate for variation of both users and information.

[1]  D. Weber,et al.  Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006 , 2011, Emerging infectious diseases.

[2]  Jane Taggart,et al.  Health reform: Is routinely collected electronic information fit for purpose? , 2012, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[3]  E. Carter,et al.  American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the management of dyspnea in patients with advanced lung or heart disease. , 2010, Chest.

[4]  S. Blount,et al.  Lead Visual Information Specialist , 2003 .

[5]  Orrin I. Franko,et al.  Mobile Tablet Use among Academic Physicians and Trainees , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[6]  F. Scutchfield A national research agenda for public health services and systems. , 2012 .

[7]  Shaun J. Grannis,et al.  Why “What Data Are Necessary for This Project?” and Other Basic Questions are Important to Address in Public Health Informatics Practice and Research , 2011, Online journal of public health informatics.

[8]  E. A. Habib MEAN ABSOLUTE DEVIATION ABOUT MEDIAN AS A TOOL OF EXPLANATORY DATA ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[9]  A. Turner,et al.  From the ground up: information needs of nurses in a rural public health department in Oregon. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[10]  Brian E Dixon,et al.  Incorporating Geospatial Capacity within Clinical Data Systems to Address Social Determinants of Health , 2011, Public health reports.

[11]  Julie J McGowan,et al.  Electronic laboratory data quality and the value of a health information exchange to support public health reporting processes. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[12]  Elizabeth C. Whipple,et al.  Linking health information technology to patient safety and quality outcomes: a bibliometric analysis and review , 2013, Informatics for health & social care.

[13]  Maulik S Joshi,et al.  Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[14]  David Levin MHealth: promise and pitfalls. , 2012, Frontiers of health services management.

[15]  Lisa M. Lee,et al.  Public health surveillance in the United States: evolution and challenges. , 2012, MMWR supplements.

[16]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  D. Buckeridge,et al.  Systematic Review: Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of Bioterrorism-Related Diseases , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  David L. Buckeridge,et al.  Application of change point analysis to daily influenza-like illness emergency department visits , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Martha Stanbury,et al.  "Blueprint version 2.0": updating public health surveillance for the 21st century. , 2013, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[22]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement , 2009, CSUR.

[23]  Joseph S. Lombardo Disease Surveillance: a Public Health Informatics Approach , 2008 .

[24]  S. Gorard REVISITING A 90-YEAR-OLD DEBATE: THE ADVANTAGES OF THE MEAN DEVIATION , 2005 .

[25]  Aligning health informatics across the public health enterprise. , 2012, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[26]  Brian E. Dixon,et al.  A Roadmap for the Adoption of e-Health , 2007 .