Randomised phase III study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, doxorubicin, vinblastine and cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy compared with radical cystectomy alone for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0209.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant methotrexate, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) were randomised to receive two cycles of neoadjuvant MVAC followed by radical cystectomy (NAC arm) or radical cystectomy alone (RC arm). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, surgery-related complications, adverse events during chemotherapy, proportion with no residual tumour in the cystectomy specimens, and quality of life. To detect an improvement in 5-year OS from 45% in the RC arm to 57% in the NAC arm with 80% power, 176 events were required per arm. RESULTS Patients (N = 130) were randomly assigned to the RC arm (N = 66) and the NAC arm (N = 64). The patient registration was terminated before reaching the initially planned number of patients because of slow accrual. At the second interim analysis just after the early stoppage of patient accrual, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early publication of the results because the trial did not have enough power to draw a confirmatory conclusion. OS of the NAC arm was better than that of the RC arm, although the difference was not statistically significant [hazard ratio 0.65, multiplicity adjusted 99.99% confidence interval 0.19-2.18, one-sided P = 0.07]. In the NAC arm and the RC arm, 34% and 9% of the patients had pT0, respectively (P < 0.01). In subgroup analyses, OS in almost all subgroups was in favour of NAC. CONCLUSIONS This trial showed a significantly increased pT0 proportion and favourable OS of patients who received neoadjuvant MVAC. NAC with MVAC can still be considered promising as a standard treatment. UMIN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY IDENTIFIER C000000093.

[1]  E. Wallen,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer does not increase risk of perioperative morbidity , 2014, BJU international.

[2]  R. Hautmann,et al.  Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: long-term results in 1100 patients. , 2012, European urology.

[3]  P. Mulders,et al.  Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is low among major European centres: results of a feasibility questionnaire. , 2012, European urology.

[4]  C. Stief,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of the prognostic value of pT0 stage after radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder , 2011, BJU international.

[5]  M. Parmar,et al.  International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Y. Lotan,et al.  Stage pT0 at radical cystectomy confers improved survival: an international study of 4,430 patients. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[7]  P. Carroll,et al.  Low incidence of perioperative chemotherapy for stage III bladder cancer 1998 to 2003: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[8]  C. Vale Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Bladder Cancer: Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data: Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration , 2005 .

[9]  H. Nishiyama,et al.  Clinical outcome of a large-scale multi-institutional retrospective study for locally advanced bladder cancer: a survey including 1131 patients treated during 1990-2000 in Japan. , 2004, European urology.

[10]  J. Chin,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Nicholas J Vogelzang,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  V. Reuter,et al.  Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. 1 1 H. Barton Grossman, M.D , 2002 .

[13]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Methotrexate Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer - Nordic Cystectomy Trial 2 , 2002, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[14]  R. Millikan,et al.  Integrated therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer: final report of a randomized trial of cystectomy plus adjuvant M-VAC versus cystectomy with both preoperative and postoperative M-VAC. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R. Wahlqvist,et al.  Five-year Followup of a Prospective Trial of Radical Cystectomy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Nordic Cystectomy Trial 1 , 1996 .

[16]  M. Igawa,et al.  [Methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (M-VAC) in advanced urothelial cancer--analysis of efficacy and toxicity]. , 1991, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology.

[17]  Y. Tomita,et al.  Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: results of multi-institutional pooled analysis. , 2004, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.