Calibration of Incremental-Recursive Flexible Damage Models in CalME Using HVS Experiments

Caltrans is in the process of implementing Mechanistic-Empirical design procedures. All mechanisticempirical methods must be validated/calibrated against the behavior of real pavements. This should be done before implementing models in design methods to ensure that designs will be reasonable. The Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) provides a first step in this validation/calibration process. The short test section can be carefully constructed with well characterized materials and instrumented to measure the pavement response. The climatic conditions may be controlled or monitored closely and all load applications are known exactly. The pavement may also be tested until it fails. The HVS may be seen as “large scale” laboratory equipment, between the “small scale” laboratory equipment (triaxial tests, bending tests etc.) and the reality of real pavements, which have uncertainties regarding materials, loads and climatic conditions. The two HVSs owned by Caltrans have been used on 27 flexible pavement test sections, with varying combinations of asphalt and granular layers. Temperature control was used during the tests. Most sections have been instrumented with Multi-depth Deflectometers (MDDs) to compare the measured pavement deflections (at several depths) to the deflections predicted by mechanistic methods, during the full duration of tests carried to “failure” (in terms of rutting or cracking). Results from mechanistic models have been compared with the deflection measurements and performance as a first step prior to empirical calibrations with field results. The complete time history of each test has been compared rather than just the beginning and end measurements. This report presents the validation of the mechanistic models for asphalt fatigue and for permanent deformation with the HVS test results.

[1]  John T Harvey,et al.  Performance of Drained and Undrained Flexible Pavement Structures Under Wet Conditions Test Data From Accelerated Pavement Test Section 543-Drained , 2004 .

[2]  John T Harvey,et al.  CAL/APT program: asphalt treated permeable base (ATPB): laboratory testing, performance, predictions, and evaluation of the experience of Caltrans and other agencies , 1999 .

[3]  Bruce S. Morton,et al.  Summary of Construction Activities and Results from Six Initial Accelerated Pavement Tests Conducted on Asphalt Concrete Pavement Section for Modified-Binder Overlay , 2005 .

[4]  John T Harvey,et al.  HIGH TEMPERATURE FATIGUE AND FATIGUE DAMAGE PROCESS OF AGGREGATE-ASPHALT MIXES , 2002 .

[5]  I Guada,et al.  CAL/APT program: test results from accelerated pavement test on pavement structure containing asphalt treated permeable base (ATPB): section 500RF , 1997 .

[6]  John T Harvey,et al.  WesTrack Fatigue Performance Prediction Using Miner’s Law , 2002 .

[7]  F Long,et al.  Application of Cal/apt Results to Long Life Flexible Pavement Reconstruction , .

[8]  John T Harvey,et al.  Performance of Drained and Undrained Flexible Pavement Structures under Wet Conditions Accelerated Test Data Test Section 544–Undrained , 2004 .

[9]  John T Harvey,et al.  Initial CAL/APT program: site information, test pavements construction, pavement materials characterizations, initial CAL/HVS test results, and performance estimates , 1996 .

[10]  Final Document,et al.  Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design OF NEW AND REHABILITATED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES FINAL DOCUMENT APPENDIX QQ : STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MODELS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS NCHRP , 2004 .

[11]  John T Harvey,et al.  Analytically Based Approach to Rutting Prediction , 2002 .

[12]  F Thoegersen,et al.  Mechanistic Design of Semi-Rigid Pavements - an Incremental Approach , 2004 .

[13]  Reynaldo Roque,et al.  EVALUATION OF SUPERPAVE MIXTURES WITH AND WITHOUT POLYMER MODIFICATION BY MEANS OF ACCELERATED PAVEMENT TESTING , 2002 .