The reaching reaction in the rat: A part of the digging pattern?

The relationship between acquired lateralized reaching and analogous innate movement patterns was examined in adult rats. In Expt. I, 8 naive rats were trained to reach into a narrow trough-shaped feeder. Analysis of the videorecorded movement showed that the forelimb extension starts 120 ms before the forepaw enters the feeder, lasts 190 ms and can be repeated at 280-ms intervals. Before reaching, the rat assumes a stereotyped posture and inserts its nose into the feeder entrance. Twelve rats used in Expt. II were raised from weaning with limited opportunity to practice manipulative skills. Six of these animals were then trained as in Expt. I. In spite of the lack of experience, they learned the reaching task as efficiently as normal rats. The remaining 6 rats were offered food placed into a wide tunnel-shaped feeder. The animals did not take advantage of the possibility of using both forelimbs, but developed typical lateralized reaching. In Expt. III, 4 rats were trained to retrieve food pellets buried under a layer of sand. The videorecorded digging movement essentially resembled reaching but the two forepaws alternated, the extension amplitude was shorter and the movement was never terminated by grasping. It is concluded that the lateralized reaching develops from modified digging and that the kinship of the two movements accounts for the stereotypy and limited modifiability of the acquired reaction.

[1]  S. Fowler,et al.  Effects of pimozide on emitted force, duration and rate of operant response maintained at low and high levels of required force , 1986, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[2]  I. Whishaw,et al.  The contributions of motor cortex, nigrostriatal dopamine and caudate-putamen to skilled forelimb use in the rat. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  H. Hydén,et al.  CHANGES IN RNA CONTENT AND BASE COMPOSITION IN CORTICAL NEURONS OF RATS IN A LEARNING EXPERIMENT INVOLVING TRANSFER OF HANDEDNESS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  S. Shettleworth Reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters: Hunger, environment, and food reinforcement. , 1975 .

[5]  V. Bracha,et al.  Unit activity of motor cortex during acoustically signalled reaching in rats , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  A. Castro,et al.  The effects of cortical ablations on digital usage in the rat. , 1972, Brain research.

[7]  J. Bureš,et al.  Handedness in rats: Blockade of reaching behavior by unilateral 6-OHDA injections into substantia nigra and caudate nucleus , 1980 .

[8]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Dopamine-rich grafts ameliorate whole body motor asymmetry and sensory neglect but not independent limb use in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions , 1987, Brain Research.

[9]  J. Bureš,et al.  Operant slowing of the extension phase of the reaching movement in rats , 1986, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  É. Dolbakyan,et al.  Skilled forelimb movements and unit activity in motor cortex and caudate nucleus in rats , 1977, Neuroscience.

[11]  V. M. Moroz,et al.  Cerebellar Unit Activity and the Movement Disruption Induced by Caudate Stimulation in Rats , 1982 .

[12]  Skilled forelimb movements and unit activity of cerebellar cortex and dentate nucleus in rats. , 1978, Physiologia Bohemoslovaca.

[13]  O. Burešová,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of discrete forelimb movements in rats. , 1973, Activitas nervosa superior.

[14]  S Grillner,et al.  Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  Robert Thompson,et al.  The ’manipulative response memory system’in the white rat , 1973 .

[16]  J. Bureš,et al.  Lateralized rewarding brain stimulation affects forepaw preference in rats , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[17]  V. Brooks The Neural Basis of Motor Control , 1986 .

[18]  J. Adams Learning of movement sequences , 1984 .