A Meta‐Analysis of Factors Affecting Local Adaptation between Interacting Species

Adaptive divergence among populations can result in local adaptation, whereby genotypes in native environments exhibit greater fitness than genotypes in novel environments. A body of theory has developed that predicts how different species traits, such as rates of gene flow and generation times, influence local adaptation in coevolutionary species interactions. We used a meta‐analysis of local‐adaptation studies across a broad range of host‐parasite interactions to evaluate predictions about the effect of species traits on local adaptation. We also evaluated how experimental design influences the outcome of local adaptation experiments. In reciprocally designed experiments, the relative gene flow rate of hosts versus parasites was the strongest predictor of local adaptation, with significant parasite local adaptation only in the studies in which parasites had greater gene flow rates than their hosts. When nonreciprocal studies were included in analyses, species traits did not explain significant variation in local adaptation, although the overall level of local adaptation observed was lower in the nonreciprocal than in the reciprocal studies. This formal meta‐analysis across a diversity of host‐parasite systems lends insight into the role of both biology (species traits) and biologists (experimental design) in detecting local adaptation in coevolving species interactions.

[1]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Patterns of local adaptation of a protozoan parasite to its bumblebee host , 1998 .

[2]  J. Ashen,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF PARASITES FROM THEIR HOSTS: A CASE STUDY IN THE PARASITIC RED ALGAE , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  Csaba Pal,et al.  Differential impact of simultaneous migration on coevolving hosts and parasites , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[4]  John J. Welch,et al.  MODULARITY AND THE COST OF COMPLEXITY , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  R. Brandl,et al.  Are sawflies adapted to individual host trees? A test of the adaptive deme formation hypothesis , 2006 .

[6]  P. Asprelli,et al.  The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution , 2006 .

[7]  R. Dufva Sympatric and allopatric combinations of hen fleas and great tits: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis , 1996 .

[8]  C. Lively Migration, Virulence, and the Geographic Mosaic of Adaptation by Parasites , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Y. Michalakis,et al.  Local adaptation of the ectoparasite Ixodes uriae to its seabird host , 2002 .

[11]  S. Nuismer,et al.  POLYGENIC TRAITS AND PARASITE LOCAL ADAPTATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  S. Frank Specificity versus detectable polymorphism in host–parasite genetics , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Buckling,et al.  The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host–parasite system , 2005, Nature.

[14]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sex against virulence: the coevolution of parasitic diseases. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Erik E Osnas,et al.  Host Sex and Local Adaptation by Parasites in a Snail‐Trematode Interaction , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[17]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[18]  Thomas Lenormand,et al.  Gene flow and the limits to natural selection , 2002 .

[19]  G. Bell,et al.  Regular ArticleSize and complexity among multicellular organisms , 1997 .

[20]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  RESAMPLING TESTS FOR META‐ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL DATA , 1997 .

[21]  A. Buckling,et al.  Relative number of generations of hosts and parasites does not influence parasite local adaptation in coevolving populations of bacteria and phages , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[22]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[23]  S. Gandon,et al.  Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host–parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time , 2002 .

[24]  J. Hatfield Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance , 1998 .

[25]  H. A. Orr,et al.  ADAPTATION AND THE COST OF COMPLEXITY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  A. Łomnicki Carrying capacity, competition and maintenance of sexuality , 2001 .

[27]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[28]  A. D. Peters,et al.  The Red Queen and Fluctuating Epistasis: A Population Genetic Analysis of Antagonistic Coevolution , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[29]  J. Jackson,et al.  Geographic and within-population structure in variable resistance to parasite species and strains in a vertebrate host. , 2005, International journal for parasitology.

[30]  M. Parker Pathogens and sex in plants , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[31]  M. Doebeli,et al.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[33]  C. Lively,et al.  Spatial variation in susceptibility to infection in a snail–trematode interaction , 2000, Parasitology.

[34]  J. Spoerke,et al.  DIVERGENCE IN SYMBIOTIC COMPATIBILITY IN A LEGUME‐BRADYRHIZOBIUM MUTUALISM , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[36]  E. Mayr Populations, Species, and Evolution, An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution , 1970 .

[37]  S. Gandon,et al.  LOCAL MALADAPTATION IN THE ANTHER‐SMUT FUNGUS MICROBOTRYUM VIOLACEUM TO ITS HOST PLANT SILENE LATIFOLIA: EVIDENCE FROM A CROSS‐INOCULATION EXPERIMENT , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  J. Thompson,et al.  The Coevolutionary Process , 1994 .

[39]  P. C. Dias,et al.  Sources and sinks in population biology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  S. Nadler,et al.  Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. , 1994, Science.

[41]  A. Hendry,et al.  The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation , 2007 .

[42]  H. Ganz,et al.  Relative migration rates and local adaptation in a mosquito‐protozoan interaction , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[43]  M. Parker Plant Fitness Variation Caused by Different Mutualist Genotypes , 1995 .

[44]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  Arne Ø. Mooers,et al.  Size and complexity among multicellular organisms , 1997 .

[46]  U. Mueller,et al.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  VARIATION IN RESISTANCE AND VIRULENCE IN THE INTERACTION BETWEEN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA AND A BACTERIAL PATHOGEN , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  B. Bohannan,et al.  Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host–parasitoid interaction , 2004, Nature.

[49]  P. Waldmann,et al.  Spatial variation in resistance and virulence in the host–pathogen system Salix triandra–Melampsora amygdalinae , 2006 .

[50]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Red King effect: When the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  S. Foitzik,et al.  Local co‐adaptation leading to a geographical mosaic of coevolution in a social parasite system , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[52]  L. Hedges,et al.  Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. , 1980 .

[53]  S. Gandon,et al.  Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a metapopulation model , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  V. Salonen,et al.  LOCAL ADAPTATION, RESISTANCE, AND VIRULENCE IN A HEMIPARASITIC PLANT‐HOST PLANT INTERACTION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  S. Gandon Local adaptation and the geometry of host–parasite coevolution , 2002 .

[56]  PARASITE LOCAL ADAPTATION IN A GEOGRAPHIC MOSAIC , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  C. Boulard,et al.  Allopatric combination of Fasciola hepatica and Lymnaea truncatula is more efficient than sympatric ones. , 2000, International journal for parasitology.

[58]  M. Forbes,et al.  Host range and local parasite adaptation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  M. Báez,et al.  Parasite local maladaptation in the Canarian lizard Gallotia galloti (Reptilia: Lacertidae) parasitized by haemogregarian blood parasite , 1999 .

[60]  D. Ebert Virulence and Local Adaptation of a Horizontally Transmitted Parasite , 1994, Science.

[61]  J. C. Hogg,et al.  Local adaptation and enhanced virulence of Nosema granulosis artificially introduced into novel populations of its crustacean host, Gammarus duebeni. , 2005, International journal for parasitology.

[62]  J. Krebs,et al.  Arms races between and within species , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[63]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Geographic structure in a widespread plant–mycorrhizal interaction: pines and false truffles , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[64]  Yuri P. Springer,et al.  CLINAL RESISTANCE STRUCTURE AND PATHOGEN LOCAL ADAPTATION IN A SERPENTINE FLAX–FLAX RUST INTERACTION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  Salonen,et al.  Local adaptation of a holoparasitic plant, Cuscuta europaea: variation among populations , 2000 .

[66]  J. Fargione,et al.  A mutualism–parasitism continuum model and its application to plant–mycorrhizae interactions , 2004 .

[67]  R. Denno,et al.  Local Adaptation in the Armored Scale Insect Pseudaulacaspis Pentagona (Homoptera: Diaspididae) , 1994 .

[68]  R. Karban Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants , 1989, Nature.

[69]  Megan A. Greischar,et al.  A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[70]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[71]  J. Graham,et al.  Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum* , 1997 .

[72]  A. Storfer,et al.  Parasite local adaptation: Red Queen versus Suicide King , 2003 .

[73]  Curtis M. Lively,et al.  Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between , 2002 .

[74]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[75]  C. Lively ADAPTATION BY A PARASITIC TREMATODE TO LOCAL POPULATIONS OF ITS SNAIL HOST , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[76]  Anna‐Liisa Laine Spatial scale of local adaptation in a plant‐pathogen metapopulation , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[77]  O. Kaltz,et al.  Local adaptation in host–parasite systems , 1998, Heredity.

[78]  C. Neema,et al.  Local adaptation and population structure at a micro‐geographical scale of a fungal parasite on its host plant , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[79]  Thompson,et al.  Weak sinks could cradle mutualistic symbioses – strong sources should harbour parasitic symbioses , 2000 .

[80]  D. Brooks,et al.  Evolutionary biology of parasites. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[81]  J. Bever,et al.  LOCAL ADAPTATION IN THE LINUM MARGINALE—MELAMPSORA LINI HOST‐PATHOGEN INTERACTION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[82]  MODULARITY AND THE COST OF COMPLEXITY , 2003 .

[83]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis with Resampling Tests. Version 1.Michael S. Rosenberg , Dean C. Adams , Jessica Gurevitch , 1998 .

[84]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[85]  P. Ewald Transmission Modes and Evolution of the Parasitism‐Mutualism Continuum a , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[86]  T. Kawecki,et al.  Conceptual issues in local adaptation , 2004 .

[87]  Peter A. Van Zandt,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Adaptive Deme Formation in Phytophagous Insect Populations , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[88]  R. Crozier,et al.  The evolution of parasites from their hosts: intra– and interspecific parasitism and Emery's rule , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[89]  S. Altizer Migratory behaviour and host-parasite co-evolution in natural populations of monarch butterflies infected with a protozoan parasite , 2001 .