Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation

Author(s): Haveman, H | Abstract: This paper examines the proposition that change is detrimental to organizational performance and survival chances. I propose that organizational change may benefit organizational performance and survival chances if it occurs in response to dramatic restructuring of environmental conditions and if it builds on established routines and competences. These propositions are tested on the savings and loan industry in California, which has experienced technological, economic, and regulatory shifts that have forced savings and loan associations to change or die. Findings indicate that most changes enhance financial performance, one is harmful to performance, and three diminish failure rates. These results support the model developed here and suggest that the question of whether change is hazardous should be replaced by the questions of under what conditions change may be hazardous or helpful and whether the direction of change affects its impact on performance and survival.'

[1]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[2]  O. Grusky,et al.  Administrative Succession in Formal Organizations , 1960 .

[3]  Sol Levine,et al.  Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships , 1961 .

[4]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[5]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Charles W. Ostrom.  Time Series Analysis: Regression Techniques , 1978 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Ratio Variables in Aggregate Data Analysis , 1979 .

[8]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[9]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[11]  The Savings and Loan Industry: Current Problems and Possible Solutions , 1984 .

[12]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[13]  W. G. Astley.  The Two Ecologies: Population and Community Perspectives on Organizational Evolution. , 1985 .

[14]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality. , 1986 .

[15]  Thrifts in Crisis: Structural Transformation of the Savings and Loan Industry , 1986 .

[16]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data. , 1986 .

[17]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[18]  Ron C. Mittelhammer,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1988 .

[19]  R. Brumbaugh.  Thrifts Under Siege: Restoring Order to American Banking , 1988 .

[20]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis , 1989 .

[21]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE VERSUS POPULATION DYNAMICS: AN ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF FAILINGS IN THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY* , 1989 .

[22]  An analysis of the causes of savings and loan association failures , 1989 .

[23]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Pooled Time Series Analysis , 1990 .

[24]  E. Ziegel.  Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1989 .

[25]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Interorganizational Linkages and Population Dynamics: Buffering and Transformational Shields. , 1990 .

[26]  T. Amburgey,et al.  Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model Of Strategic Change , 1991 .

[27]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[28]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Differentiation Within An Organizational Population: Additional Evidence from The Wine Industry , 1991 .

[29]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. , 1990 .