Urban volumetrics: spatial complexity and wayfinding, extending space syntax to three dimensional space

Wayfinding behavior and pedestrian movement pattern research relies on objective spatial configuration representation and analysis, such as space syntax, to quantify and control for the difficulty of wayfinding in multi-level buildings and urban built environments. However, the space syntax's representation oversimplifies multi-level vertical connections. The more recent segment and angular approaches to space syntax remain un-operationalizable in three-dimensional space. The two-dimensional axial-map and segment map line representations are reviewed to determine their extension to three-dimensional space line representation. Using an extreme case study research strategy, four representations of a large scale complex multi-level outdoor and indoor built environment are tested against observed pedestrian movement patterns N = 17,307. Association with the movement patterns increases steadily as the representation increases toward high three-dimensional space level of definition and completeness. A novel hybrid angular-Euclidean analysis was used for the objective description of three-dimensional built environment complexity. The results suggest that pedestrian wayfinding and movement pattern research in a multi-level built environment should include interdependent outdoor and indoor, and use full threedimensional line representation.

[1]  H. Spiers,et al.  Global Determinants of Navigation Ability , 2017, Current Biology.

[2]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[3]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Multi-floor buildings and human wayfinding cognition , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Roddy M. Grieves,et al.  The place-cell representation of volumetric space in rats , 2019, Nature Communications.

[5]  Alain Chiaradia,et al.  Using multiple hybrid spatial design network analysis to predict longitudinal effect of a major city centre redevelopment on pedestrian flows , 2019, Transportation.

[6]  Beatrix Emo,et al.  Seeing the Axial Line: Evidence from Wayfinding Experiments , 2014, Behavioral sciences.

[7]  Julienne Hanson,et al.  Decoding homes and houses , 1998 .

[8]  Michael Batty,et al.  The Automatic Definition and Generation of Axial Lines and Axial Maps , 2004 .

[9]  Alan Penn,et al.  Space syntax and spatial cognition: or why the axial line? , 2001 .

[10]  S. Samant Title: Cities in the Sky: Elevating Singapore's Urban Spaces , 2022 .

[11]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  No advantage for remembering horizontal over vertical spatial locations learned from a single viewpoint , 2017, Memory & Cognition.

[12]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  Adaptable Path Planning in Regionalized Environments , 2009, COSIT.

[13]  Duane F. Marble,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS , 1962 .

[14]  T. Tenbrink,et al.  Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning , 2011, Cognition.

[15]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Getting Lost in Buildings , 2010 .

[16]  Andrew Allan,et al.  The development of grade separation pedestrian system: A review , 2013 .

[17]  Alasdair Turner,et al.  An Algorithmic Definition of the Axial Map , 2005 .

[18]  P. Haggett Network Analysis In Geography , 1971 .

[19]  Kim Dovey,et al.  Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity , 2018, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

[20]  C. Zimring,et al.  Just Down The Road A Piece , 2003 .

[21]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Challenges in Multilevel Wayfinding: A Case Study with the Space Syntax Technique , 2012 .

[22]  Dongkuk Chang,et al.  Spatial Choice and Preference in Multilevel Movement Networks , 2002 .

[23]  C. Ratti Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies , 2004 .

[24]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Studying Cities to Learn about Minds: Some Possible Implications of Space Syntax for Spatial Cognition , 2012 .

[25]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement , 2005 .

[26]  Michael O'Neill,et al.  Evaluation of a Conceptual Model of Architectural Legibility , 1991 .

[27]  E. Maguire,et al.  Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London's Layout Drives Structural Brain Changes , 2011, Current Biology.

[28]  Alain J. Chiaradia,et al.  In the intelligibility maze of space syntax: a space syntax analysis of toy models, mazes and labyrinths , 2013 .

[29]  Mario L. Small,et al.  The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties , 2019, Annual Review of Sociology.

[30]  S. Clegg Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2002 .

[31]  Mahbub Rashid Space Syntax: A Network-Based Configurational Approach to Studying Urban Morphology , 2019, The Mathematics of Urban Morphology.

[32]  Philip Steadman,et al.  Developments in Space Syntax , 2004 .

[33]  Chang-Deok Kang,et al.  Measuring the effects of street network configurations on walking in Seoul, Korea , 2017 .

[34]  Saif Haq Investigating the Syntax Line: Configurational Properties and Cognitive Correlates , 2003 .

[35]  M L Bobrow,et al.  On planning and design. , 1976, Hospital forum.

[36]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Linking Objective Measures Of Space To Cognition And Action , 2003 .

[37]  J. D. Solomon,et al.  Cities Without Ground: A Hong Kong Guidebook , 2012 .

[38]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Modeling Directional Knowledge and Reasoning in Environmental Space: Testing Qualitative Metrics , 1996 .

[39]  Stephen Marshall,et al.  Line structure representation for road network analysis , 2016 .

[40]  Antoine Coutrot,et al.  Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability , 2020, Nature.

[41]  Alasdair Turner,et al.  From Axial to Road-Centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis , 2007 .

[42]  Zheng Tan,et al.  Walking as a Planned Activity: Elevated Pedestrian Network and Urban Design Regulation in Hong Kong , 2014 .

[43]  Kazushi Sano,et al.  A novel approach to model traffic on road segments of large-scale urban road networks , 2019, MethodsX.

[44]  Jonathan M. Bunker,et al.  Shortest path distance vs. least directional change: Empirical testing of space syntax and geographic theories concerning pedestrian route choice behaviour , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[45]  Xiaohu Zhang,et al.  Connecting the city: A three-dimensional pedestrian network of Hong Kong , 2019, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

[46]  Leslie Forsyth,et al.  Addressing distance in the space syntax syntactical model , 2001 .

[47]  William H. Warren,et al.  Space syntax visibility graph analysis is not robust to changes in spatial and temporal resolution , 2020, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

[48]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The Hidden Geometry of Deformed Grids: Or, Why Space Syntax Works, When it Looks as Though it Shouldn't , 1999 .

[49]  Alain J. Chiaradia,et al.  sDNA: how and why we reinvented Spatial Network Analysis for health, economics and active modes of transport , 2015 .

[50]  Im Sik Cho,et al.  Towards an Integrated Urban Space Framework for Emerging Urban Conditions in a High-density Context , 2015 .

[51]  Crispin Cooper,et al.  Using spatial network analysis to model pedal cycle flows, risk and mode choice , 2017 .

[52]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Learning landmarks and routes in multi-floored buildings. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[53]  Samia Sharmin,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement , 2018 .

[54]  Vítor Oliveira The Study of Urban Form: Different Approaches , 2016 .

[55]  R Conroy-Dalton The secret is to follow your nose: route path selection and angularity , 2001 .

[56]  K. Mengersen,et al.  Wayfinding: A simple concept, a complex process , 2012 .

[57]  K. Jeffery Urban Architecture: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective , 2019, The Design Journal.

[58]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Exploring Individual Differences and Building Complexity in Wayfinding: The Case of the Seattle Central Library , 2019, Environment and Behavior.

[59]  D. McNeill Volumetric urbanism: The production and extraction of Singaporean territory , 2019, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space.

[60]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  How does horizontal and vertical navigation influence spatial memory of multifloored environments? , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[61]  Yi Lu,et al.  Can people memorize multilevel building as volumetric map? A study of multilevel atrium building , 2019 .

[62]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking , 2005 .

[63]  Ruth Dalton,et al.  Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design , 2011 .

[64]  Andrew Allan,et al.  Assessing grade separation pedestrian systems: Planning, design and operation , 2015 .

[65]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture , 1996 .

[66]  Jake Desyllas,et al.  Modelling Natural Surveillance , 2003 .

[67]  Perver K. Baran,et al.  Does Intelligibility Affect Place Legibility? Understanding the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Evaluations of the Urban Environment , 2012 .

[68]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTION OF SPACE SYNTAX TO A COMPREHENSIVE THEORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2007 .

[69]  Rui Li,et al.  Running head : WAYFINDING IN COMPLEX BUILDINGS 1 Wayfinding Behaviors in Complex Buildings : The Impact of Environmental Legibility and Familiarity , 2014 .

[70]  R. Golledge Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes , 2010 .

[71]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[72]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology , 2002, Trans. GIS.

[73]  Charlie Q. L. Xue,et al.  Indoor ‘Public’ Space: A study of atria in mass transit railway (MTR) complexes of Hong Kong , 2012 .

[74]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[75]  Crispin Cooper,et al.  Predictive spatial network analysis for high-resolution transport modeling, applied to cyclist flows, mode choice, and targeting investment , 2018 .

[76]  C. Xue Rail Village and Mega-Structure , 2016 .

[77]  Alan Penn,et al.  Integrated Multilevel Circulation in Dense Urban Areas: The Effect of Multiple Interacting Constraints on the Use of Complex Urban Areas , 1998 .

[78]  Alain J. Chiaradia,et al.  Network, Network, Network: New Techniques in Pedestrian Movement Analysis , 2014 .