Comparing the Efficacy of Postoperative Antibiotic Regimens in the Treatment of Maxillofacial Fractures: A Prospective Study.

AIM The present study was designed to investigate the difference in the effectiveness of a 3 day postoperative course and a single perioperative dose of antibiotics on the incidence of postoperative infection in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS About 183 maxillofacial trauma patients requiring open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) under general anesthesia were divided based on the type of fracture sustained, i.e., mandibular fractures, Le Fort fractures, and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Patients from each fracture type were randomized into two groups, A and B. All patients were administered amoxicillin/clavulanate 1.2 grams intravenously 8 hours from the time of admission till the patient was taken up for surgery. Once the patients were taken up for surgery, a perioperative dose was administered. No antibiotics beyond this point were given to patients in Group A. Patients in Group B were administered the same antibiotic for 3 postoperative days additionally. Outcomes in terms of purulent discharge from the surgical site, an abscess or any other sign of infection, and wound dehiscence requiring reopening of the surgical site were considered. Patients were reviewed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months. RESULTS No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups across all three fracture types in terms of postoperative outcomes. However, increased numbers of complications were noted in the patients treated with an intra-oral approach in each fracture type irrespective of group. All complications were managed with local measures. CONCLUSION A single perioperative dose of antibiotics is effective in minimizing postoperative complications following ORIF of maxillofacial fractures and there is no significant benefit in prolonging the course of antibiotics postoperatively with the need for further studies to be conducted considering comminuted, complex fractures and old fractures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE In maxillofacial trauma, fractures frequently communicate with contaminated indigenous flora on the skin surface, oral cavities, or sinus cavities. Surgery is frequently performed using an approach across a contaminated area, even in closed fractures. Postoperative infections can be significantly decreased by using antibiotics in surgical procedures to treat facial fractures.

[1]  P. Mehra,et al.  Outcomes following use of a standard antibiotic protocol in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients. , 2020, Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research.

[2]  B. Al-Nawas,et al.  A systematic review of latest evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in oral and maxillofacial surgery , 2019, Infection.

[3]  Geoffrey C Schreiner,et al.  Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics for facial fractures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2019, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  T. Dodson,et al.  Limiting Antibiotics When Managing Mandible Fractures May Not Increase Infection Risk. , 2016, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  T. Iizuka,et al.  The role of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of facial fractures: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical study. Part 3: Le Fort and zygomatic fractures in 94 patients. , 2014, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  T. Iizuka,et al.  The role of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of facial fractures: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical study. Part 1: orbital fractures in 62 patients. , 2013, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  J. Spiegel,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in the management of complex midface and frontal sinus trauma , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  B. Miles,et al.  The efficacy of postoperative antibiotic regimens in the open treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective randomized trial. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  E. Ellis Outcomes of patients with teeth in the line of mandibular angle fractures treated with stable internal fixation. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  A. Abubaker,et al.  Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in mandibular fractures: A preliminary randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical study. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  T. Dodson,et al.  Risk Factors for Infection Following Operative Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Multivariate Analysis , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  R. Chole,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for facial fractures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[14]  T. Iizuka,et al.  The role of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of facial fractures: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical study. Part 2: Mandibular fractures in 59 patients. , 2013, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.