Low-dose spiral CT: applicability to paediatric chest imaging

Background. Spiral CT of the chest is an imaging technique with unequivocal indications and proven higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional chest X-rays. However, particularly in children, attempts should be made to reduce radiation exposure to a minimum. Objective. To evaluate whether a low-dose technique in spiral CT scanning results in adequate diagnostic information. Materials and methods. In a prospective study, 27 children (range 3 weeks to 14 years, mean 7 years) underwent a low-dose CT examination of the chest for various indications. The tube energy was 12.5 mAs (n = 5), 25 mAs (n = 17), 50 mAs (n = 3), or 75 mAs (n = 2) per slice. Two radiologists evaluated, in consensus, the CT scans with respect to their diagnostic value and comparison was made with 20 standard-dose chest CT examinations of adults (175 mAs per slice, mean age 56 years) with respect to technical image quality (noise and artefacts). In a second part of the study, dose measurements were carried out by means of exposing thermoluminescent dosimeters attached to a water/air phantom simulating a child's chest. Results. All low-dose CT scans were of diagnostic image quality and no additional studies were necessary. The average image noise was significantly higher than in standard-dose CT examinations (SD 39.5 compared with 12.5 for unenhanced soft tissue, P < 0.01), but did not hinder accurate diagnosis. Artefacts were exclusively due to patient motion. Radiation exposure per slice was approx. 4 mGy at 25 mAs and 34 mGy at 250 mAs, regardless of slice thickness. Conclusions. For all indications in paediatric CT scanning of the chest, low-dose technique provides adequate image quality without loss of diagnostic information. The radiation exposure is approximately 5–20 % of a standard-dose CT.

[1]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[2]  J. Remy,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: detection with thick-section spiral CT versus conventional CT. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  N. Müller,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  K S Pentlow,et al.  Radiation dose in CT. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  D Blume,et al.  Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[6]  W A Kalender,et al.  A Comparison of Conventional and Spiral CT: An Experimental Study on the Detection of Spherical Lesions , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  A. Wright,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: effect on detection of spiral CT pitch. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  N L Müller,et al.  High-resolution CT of the chest: radiation dose. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  A. Wright,et al.  Comparison of spiral-acquisition computed tomography and conventional computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary metastatic disease. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  B. Bauer,et al.  Erhebungen zur Strahlenexposition der Patienten bei der Röntgendiagnostik , 1995 .

[11]  D. McCauley,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. , 1990, Radiology.

[12]  J. Cooke,et al.  A comparison of radiation doses to the breast in computed tomographic chest examinations for two scanning protocols. , 1989, Clinical radiology.

[13]  K W McEnery,et al.  Helical CT: principles and technical considerations. , 1994, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.