Care in Context: Men's Unpaid Work in 20 Countries, 1965–2003

By situating men within the country and time period in which they live, social scientists are better able to understand men's housework and child care behaviors. The author proposes that national context, conceptualized here as women's employment practices and policies, influences men's unpaid work behaviors by shaping the benefits of specialization, the terms of bargaining, and the ease of adhering to gender ideologies and norms. Using 44 time-use surveys from 20 countries (spanning 1965 to 2003) combined with original national-level data, the author utilizes multilevel models to test hypotheses regarding the relationship between national context and men's unpaid work behaviors. She finds that men's unpaid work time increases with national levels of women's employment. Furthermore, the effect of children on men's unpaid work time depends on women's national employment hours, the length of available parental leave, and men's eligibility to take parental leave, which indicates that particular public policies affect men in specific household situations. The analyses document the importance of national context for the unpaid work behaviors of all men, especially fathers, and shift the research focus from the attributes of individual men to the structures that hinder and facilitate men's unpaid work.

[1]  J. Windebank.  Dual-Earner Couples in Britain and France: Gender Divisions of Domestic Labour and Parenting Work in different Welfare States , 2001 .

[2]  Jerry A. Jacobs,et al.  Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society , 2002 .

[3]  Beth Anne Shelton,et al.  Women, men and time: gender differences in paid work, housework and leisure , 1993 .

[4]  F. Cancian,et al.  Caring and Gender , 1999 .

[5]  P. Stearns.  Fatherhood in historical perspective: The role of social change. , 1991 .

[6]  D. M. Wolfe,et al.  Husbands and Wives, the Dynamics of Married Living , 1961 .

[7]  R. Breen,et al.  The Persistence of the Gendered Division of Domestic Labour , 2005 .

[8]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[9]  Peter McDonald,et al.  Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility , 2000 .

[10]  N. Gerstel,et al.  Caring for Kith and Kin: Gender, Employment, and the Privatization of Care , 1994 .

[11]  A. J. Hawkins,et al.  Generative fathering : beyond deficit perspectives , 1997 .

[12]  O. Sullivan,et al.  Time Use, Gender, and Public Policy Regimes , 2003 .

[13]  A. Hochschild.  The Culture of Politics: Traditional, Postmodern, Cold-modern, and Warm-modern Ideals of Care , 1995 .

[14]  M. McElroy,et al.  Nash-bargained household decisions: toward a generalization of the theory of demand , 1981 .

[15]  Robert A. Pollak,et al.  Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage , 1996 .

[16]  Jerry A. Jacobs,et al.  The Time Divide , 2005 .

[17]  P. England,et al.  When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Makiko Fuwa,et al.  Macro-level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries , 2004 .

[19]  Robert A. Pollak,et al.  Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources?: Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit , 1997 .

[20]  J. Wilkie.  CHANGES IN U.S. MEN'S ATTITUDES TOWARD THE FAMILY PROVIDER ROLE, 1972-1989 , 1993 .

[21]  Scott Coltrane,et al.  Research on household labor : Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work , 2000 .

[22]  D. Sainsbury.  Taxation, Family Responsibilities, and Employment , 1999 .

[23]  L. Haas.  Equal Parenthood and Social Policy: A Study of Parental Leave in Sweden , 1992 .

[24]  F. Rosenbluth,et al.  The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross‐National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap , 2006 .

[25]  Jennifer L. Hook.  Reconsidering the Division of Household Labor: Incorporating Volunteer Work and Informal Support. , 2004 .

[26]  D. Sainsbury.  Gendering welfare states , 1994 .

[27]  J. Hearn,et al.  Critical Studies on Men in Ten European Countries , 2002 .

[28]  A. Orloff.  Gender and Social Rights , 1998 .

[29]  M. Marini,et al.  Measuring Household Work: Recent Experience in the United States , 1993 .

[30]  R. Mahon,et al.  Gender, Equality, and Welfare States , 1997 .

[31]  T. Knijn,et al.  Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship , 1997 .

[32]  Philip N. Cohen,et al.  Premarital Cohabitation and Housework: Couples in Cross‐National Perspective , 2002 .

[33]  C. Geist.  The Welfare State and the Home: Regime Differences in the Domestic Division of Labour , 2005 .

[34]  S. South,et al.  Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households , 1994 .

[35]  Katherin E. Ross,et al.  Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation Across Fourteen Welfare States , 1997 .

[36]  H. Joshi.  Households, Employment and Gender: A Social, Economic and Demographic View , 1988 .

[37]  M. Bittman,et al.  Men's Welfare State, Women's Welfare State: Tendencies to Convergence in Practice and Theory? , 1994 .

[38]  Thomas P. Boje,et al.  Gender, Welfare State and the Market : Towards a New Division of Labour , 2000 .

[39]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Sampling Weights and Regression Analysis , 1994 .

[40]  Anna Gavanas.  Making Men into Fathers: The Fatherhood Responsibility Movement: the centrality of marriage, work and male sexuality in reconstructions of masculinity and fatherhood , 2002 .

[41]  S. Coverman.  EXPLAINING HUSBANDS' PARTICIPATION IN DOMESTIC LABOR , 1985 .

[42]  M. H. Meyer.  Care work : gender, class, and the welfare state , 2000 .

[43]  P. Moss,et al.  Leave arrangements for parents: Overview and future outlook , 2002 .

[44]  M. Manser,et al.  Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis , 1980 .

[45]  D. Sainsbury.  Women's and Men's Social Rights: Gendering Dimensions of Welfare States , 1994 .

[46]  B. Bergmann.  Becker's theory of the family: Preposterous conclusions , 1995 .

[47]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Work in the Family and in the Labor Market: A Cross-national, Reciprocal Analysis , 1990 .

[48]  D. Heer,et al.  The Measurement and Bases of Family Power: An Overview , 1963 .

[49]  F. Bozett,et al.  Fatherhood and Families in Cultural Context , 1991 .

[50]  M. McElroy.  The Empirical Content of Nash- Bargained Household Behavior , 1990 .

[51]  J. Baxter,et al.  Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective , 1997 .

[52]  J. Lewis,et al.  Women and social policies in Europe : work, family and the state , 1994 .

[53]  Sandra L. Hofferth,et al.  Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society , 2001 .

[54]  A. Orloff,et al.  Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States , 1993 .

[55]  Andrew S. Harvey,et al.  Guidelines for time use data collection , 1993 .

[56]  M. Cunningham.  Parental Influences on the Gendered Division of Housework , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[57]  E. Rotundo.  American Fatherhood , 1985 .

[58]  N. Folbre.  Hearts and spades: Paradigms of household economics , 1986 .

[59]  B. Major.  Gender, Entitlement, and the Distribution of Family Labor , 1993 .

[60]  H. De Vroom,et al.  Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) , 2006 .

[61]  D. Morgan,et al.  Making Men into Fathers: Introduction: making men into fathers , 2002 .

[62]  A. Wharton,et al.  The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality , 2005 .

[63]  A. J. Hawkins,et al.  Maternal Gatekeeping: Mothers' Beliefs and Behaviors That Inhibit Greater Father Involvement in Family Work , 1999 .

[64]  J. Brines.  The Exchange Value of Housework , 1993 .

[65]  M. Baker.  Parental Benefit Policies and the Gendered Division of Labor , 1997, Social Service Review.

[66]  B. Hobson,et al.  Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (review) , 2005 .

[67]  J. Lewis.  Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes , 1992 .

[68]  L. Treiber,et al.  Caring and Gender , 1999 .

[69]  Michael Anderson,et al.  The Social and Political Economy of the Household , 1994 .

[70]  J. Brines,et al.  Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  D. M. Wolfe,et al.  Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living , 1961 .

[72]  Sanjiv Gupta.  The Effects of Transitions in Marital Status on Men's Performance of Housework , 1999 .

[73]  S. Hoffman.  A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[74]  M. Bittman,et al.  Family Time : The Social Organization of Care , 2004 .

[75]  Shelley M. MacDermid,et al.  Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment , 2005 .

[76]  K. Gerson.  No Man's Land: Men's Changing Commitments To Family And Work , 1993 .

[77]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor , 2000 .

[78]  Erica Frank,et al.  The Second Shift , 2002 .

[79]  A. J. Walker,et al.  Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood. , 1989 .

[80]  Sarah Fenstermaker Berk.  The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households , 1985 .

[81]  M. Daly.  Comparing Welfare States: Towards a Gender Friendly Approach , 1994 .

[82]  Arnlaug Leira.  Caring as Social Right: Cash for Child Care and Daddy Leave , 1998 .

[83]  F. Block,et al.  Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies , 2001 .

[84]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Modelling domestic work time , 1995 .

[85]  Barbara J. Risman,et al.  Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition , 1998 .

[86]  N. L. Feuvre.  The Gender Division of Welfare. The Impact of the British and the German Welfare States , 2001 .

[87]  S. Sudman,et al.  Time, Goods, and Well-Being , 1985 .

[88]  Randal D. Day,et al.  Scholarship on Fatherhood in the 1990s and Beyond , 2000 .

[89]  Harriet B. Presser,et al.  Employment Schedules Among Dual-Earner Spouses and the Division of Household Labor by Gender , 1994 .

[90]  G. Esping‐Andersen,et al.  The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism , 1990 .

[91]  Theodore N. Greenstein,et al.  Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension , 2000 .