A Histology-Based Model for Predicting Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancers

Identifying colorectal cancers (CRCs) with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is clinically important. MSI-H is a positive prognostic marker for CRC, a predictive marker for resistance to standard 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and an important feature for identifying individuals and families with Lynch syndrome. Our aim was to compare and improve upon the existing predictive pathology models for MSI-H CRCs. We tested 2 existing models used to predict MSI-H tumors, (1) Revised Bethesda Guidelines and (2) MsPath, in our population-based cohort of CRCs diagnosed less than 75 years from Newfoundland (N=710). We also scored additional histologic features not described in the other models. From this analysis, we developed a model for the prediction of MSI-H CRCs; Pathologic Role in Determination of Instability in Colorectal Tumors (PREDICT). An independent pathologist validated this model in a second cohort of all CRCs (N=276). Tumor histology was a better predictor of MSI status than was personal and family history of cancer. MsPath identified MSI-H CRCs with a sensitivity of 92.1% and a specificity of 37.8%, whereas the Revised Bethesda Guidelines had a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 39.5%. PREDICT included some new histology features, including peritumoral lymphocytic reaction and increased proportion of plasma cells in the tumor stroma. PREDICT was superior to both existing models in the development cohort with a sensitivity of 97.4% and a specificity of 53.9%. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity 76.6%. We conclude that PREDICT is a good predictor of MSI-H CRC.

[1]  T. Hickish,et al.  Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  D. Parkin,et al.  Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  A. Chapelle The Incidence of Lynch Syndrome , 2004, Familial Cancer.

[4]  W. Frankel,et al.  Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J André Knottnerus,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic procedures , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  A. de la Chapelle,et al.  The genetic basis of colorectal cancer in a population-based incident cohort with a high rate of familial disease , 2010, Gut.

[7]  D. Bishop,et al.  Clinical impact of colonoscopic screening in first‐degree relatives of patients with hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  C. Boland,et al.  Mismatch repair proficiency and in vitro response to 5-fluorouracil. , 1999, Gastroenterology.

[9]  J André Knottnerus,et al.  Evidence base of clinical diagnosis Evaluation of diagnostic procedures , 2022 .

[10]  J. Cubiella,et al.  The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer depends on the mismatch repair status. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[11]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. , 1993, Science.

[12]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Randall G. Lee,et al.  Combination of microsatellite instability and lymphocytic infiltrate as a prognostic indicator for adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[14]  J. Potter,et al.  The Association of Tumor Microsatellite Instability Phenotype with Family History of Colorectal Cancer , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  P. Sistonen,et al.  Screening reduces colorectal cancer rate in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[16]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[17]  Richard D Kolodner,et al.  The mismatch repair complex hMutS alpha recognizes 5-fluorouracil-modified DNA: implications for chemosensitivity and resistance. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[18]  A. de la Chapelle,et al.  Clinical relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Woods,et al.  High Frequency of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in Newfoundland Likely Involves Novel Susceptibility Genes , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  A. Rustgi,et al.  The genetics of hereditary colon cancer. , 2007, Genes & development.

[21]  W. Zoller,et al.  [Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer]. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie.

[22]  J. Mecklin,et al.  Surveillance improves survival of colorectal cancer in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. , 2000, Cancer detection and prevention.

[23]  John D Potter,et al.  Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[24]  B. Uzzan,et al.  Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[25]  S Srivastava,et al.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. , 1998, Cancer research.

[26]  E. Dekker,et al.  One to 2-year surveillance intervals reduce risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[27]  Heather Hampel,et al.  Feasibility of screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  M. Leppert,et al.  Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancer is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[29]  Sudhir Srivastava,et al.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  Randall G. Lee,et al.  Combination of microsatellite instability and lymphocytic infiltrate as a prognostic indicator in colon cancer. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[31]  S. Bull,et al.  Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  P. Parfrey,et al.  Very high incidence of familial colorectal cancer in Newfoundland: a comparison with Ontario and 13 other population-based studies , 2006, Familial Cancer.

[33]  S. Gruber,et al.  Pathologic Predictors of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[34]  R. Houlston,et al.  Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  I. Kirsch,et al.  Prognostic significance of DNA replication errors in young patients with colorectal cancer. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[36]  L. D. Tin,et al.  Microsatellite instability and high content of activated cytotoxic lymphocytes identify colon cancer patients with a favorable prognosis. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[37]  C. Behling,et al.  Use of 5-fluorouracil and survival in patients with microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. , 2004, Gastroenterology.