Organizational Sensing and the Occasions for Strategizing

Abstract What can a behavioral approach contribute to the understanding of strategizing? Assuming that “strategizing” is a deliberative process typically engaged in by small groups in the leadership of a large organization, the most promising targets for behavioral studies may not be that process itself. Attention could well go instead to the organizational sensors that detect strategic issues and provide the information input for considering them, and the constraints that limit implementation. In contrast to the content of deliberation, these sensors and related structures are often slow-moving organizational traits and may be readily observable from external vantage points – such as the position of an observer seeking to predict the strategic choices of the organization.

[1]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[2]  M. Jacobides What drove the financial crisis? Structuring our historical understanding of a predictable evolutionary disaster , 2015 .

[3]  S. Winter Pursuing the evolutionary agenda in economics and management research , 2016 .

[4]  Michael X Cohen Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine , 2007 .

[5]  S. Bowles Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors? , 2009, Science.

[6]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[7]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Challenger: Fine-Tuning the Odds Until Something Breaks , 1988 .

[8]  P. Adler,et al.  The Role of Affect in Creative Projects and Exploratory Search , 2007 .

[9]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[10]  S. Winter Habit, Deliberation, and Action: Strengthening the Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities , 2013 .

[11]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. , 1967, Psychological review.

[13]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Information, Knowledge Vision and Theories of the Firm , 1994 .

[14]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[15]  Michael X Cohen What’s different is routine , 2006 .

[16]  Cade Massey,et al.  The Loser's Curse: Decision Making and Market Efficiency in the National Football League Draft , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Specialised Perception, Selection, and Strategic Surprise: Learning from the Moths and Bees , 2004 .

[18]  A. W. Marshall,et al.  The fog of strategy: Some organizational perspectives on strategy and the strategic management challenges in the changing competitive environment , 2017 .

[19]  David Obstfeld,et al.  Creative Projects: A Less Routine Approach Toward Getting New Things Done , 2012, Organ. Sci..