The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David Swinney,et al. The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora , 2008 .
[2] Herbert Schriefers,et al. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush , 2006 .
[3] Martin J. Pickering,et al. A time course analysis of enriched composition , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[4] Robin K. Morris,et al. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses , 2005 .
[5] B. McElree,et al. Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .
[6] C. Clifton,et al. The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond , 2004 .
[7] Martin J. Pickering,et al. Eye movements and semantic composition , 2004 .
[8] Kristin M Weingartner,et al. Readers’ sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[9] Shelia M. Kennison,et al. Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing☆ , 2003 .
[10] M. Masson. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[11] P. Sturt,et al. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .
[12] W. Badecker,et al. The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[13] Robin K. Morris,et al. Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .
[14] Herbert Schriefers,et al. The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .
[15] H. Clements. ProQuest Digital Dissertations , 2002 .
[16] B. McElree,et al. Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[17] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Syntactic Focusing Structures Influence Discourse Processing , 2000 .
[18] Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.
[19] Simon Garrod,et al. The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .
[20] Martin J. Pickering,et al. The Time Course of the Influence of Implicit Causality Information: Focusing versus Integration Accounts , 2000 .
[21] Frank Rösler,et al. Event-Related Responses to Pronoun and Proper Name Anaphors in Parallel and Nonparallel Discourse Structures , 1999, Brain and Language.
[22] A. Almor. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus : The informational load hypothesis , 1999 .
[23] B. McElree,et al. Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[24] Robin K. Morris,et al. Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[25] C. Chambers,et al. Structural Parallelism and Discourse Coherence: A Test of Centering Theory , 1998 .
[26] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[27] B. McElree,et al. Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .
[28] K. Rayner,et al. Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[29] M. Pickering,et al. Influence of Connectives on Language Comprehension: Eye tracking Evidence for Incremental Interpretation , 1997 .
[30] Ann Cutler,et al. Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.
[31] M. Brysbaert,et al. Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch , 1996 .
[32] A. Garnham,et al. The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.
[33] G. McKoon,et al. Pronoun resolution without pronouns: some consequences of memory-based text processing. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] Brian McElree,et al. Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[35] W. Chafe. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing , 1996 .
[36] Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al. The Role of Parallelism in Strategies of Pronoun Comprehension , 1995 .
[37] M. Gernsbacher,et al. Cataphoric Devices in Spoken Discourse , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.
[38] Janet L. McDonald,et al. THE TIME COURSE OF ANAPHOR RESOLUTION: EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT VERB CAUSALITY AND GENDER , 1995 .
[39] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. The Effect of Focus on Memory for Words in Sentences , 1995 .
[40] M. Gernsbacher,et al. The advantage of first mention in Spanish , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[41] S. Garrod,et al. The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .
[42] B. Dosher,et al. Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .
[43] B. McElree,et al. The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .
[44] Barbara J. Grosz,et al. Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..
[45] R. Ratcliff,et al. Pronoun resolution and discourse models. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[46] Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al. Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .
[47] B. MacWhinney,et al. Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns , 1990 .
[48] K. Bock,et al. Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.
[49] K. Rayner,et al. Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance , 1990, Language and speech.
[50] P. Culicover,et al. English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .
[51] K. Kirsner,et al. The representation of text-based and situation-based information in discourse comprehension , 1990 .
[52] B. Dosher,et al. Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .
[53] M. Beeman,et al. Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.
[54] M. Gernsbacher. Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.
[55] M. Gernsbacher,et al. Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.
[56] M. Chodorow,et al. Pronoun resolution in two-clause sentences: Effects of ambiguity, antecedent location, and depth of embedding ☆ , 1988 .
[57] C. Fowler,et al. Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .
[58] E. J. O'Brien. Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[59] Candace L. Sidner,et al. Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.
[60] J. Stern. Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.
[61] Barbara Anne Dosher,et al. Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .
[62] K. Rayner,et al. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .
[63] Eric Wanner,et al. Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .
[64] J. Engelkamp,et al. The Interaction of Subjectivization and Concept Placement in the Processing of Cleft Sentences , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[65] F. Keil. Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 1982 .
[66] Hubert D. Zimmer,et al. The given-new structure of cleft sentences and their influence on picture viewing , 1981 .
[67] Roger Ratcliff,et al. The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference , 1980 .
[68] Albert T. Corbett,et al. Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .
[69] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment , 1978, Cognition.
[70] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .
[71] Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .
[72] S. Sternberg. Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .
[73] A V Reed,et al. Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.
[74] H. H. Clark. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .
[75] Brian McElree,et al. Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .
[76] Stephani Foraker,et al. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .
[77] S. Liversedge,et al. The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[78] Andrew Barss,et al. Anaphora : a reference guide , 2003 .
[79] Steven Pinker,et al. Language acquisition , 2003 .
[80] Alan Garnham,et al. Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora , 2001 .
[81] Larry L. Jacoby,et al. Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .
[82] Atsu Inoue,et al. Syntactic Features in Reanalysis: Positive and Negative Symptoms , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[83] B McElree,et al. Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[84] R. Sandt,et al. Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , 1999 .
[85] Simon P. Liversedge,et al. Chapter 3 – Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time , 1998 .
[86] M. Pickering,et al. Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .
[87] James S. Nairne,et al. Short-Term/Working Memory , 1996 .
[88] Karen E. Lochbaum,et al. Centering : A Framework for Modellingthe Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995 .
[89] S. Garrod,et al. Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .
[90] K. Bock,et al. From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.
[91] Mira Ariel. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .
[92] David A. Balota,et al. Comprehension Processes in Reading , 1990 .
[93] Simon Garrod,et al. Referential processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. , 1990 .
[94] G. G. Vining. Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .
[95] W. Vonk,et al. Eye Movements During Comprehension of Pronouns , 1984 .
[96] Simon Garrod,et al. Pronouns Without Explicit Antecedents , 1983 .
[97] T. Givón,et al. Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .
[98] T. Givon. Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .
[99] Barbara Anne Dosher,et al. Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .
[100] M. Just,et al. Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .