The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations

[1]  David Swinney,et al.  The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora , 2008 .

[2]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush , 2006 .

[3]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  A time course analysis of enriched composition , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses , 2005 .

[5]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[6]  C. Clifton,et al.  The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond , 2004 .

[7]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Eye movements and semantic composition , 2004 .

[8]  Kristin M Weingartner,et al.  Readers’ sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing☆ , 2003 .

[10]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[11]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[12]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[14]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .

[15]  H. Clements ProQuest Digital Dissertations , 2002 .

[16]  B. McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Syntactic Focusing Structures Influence Discourse Processing , 2000 .

[18]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[19]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .

[20]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  The Time Course of the Influence of Implicit Causality Information: Focusing versus Integration Accounts , 2000 .

[21]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Event-Related Responses to Pronoun and Proper Name Anaphors in Parallel and Nonparallel Discourse Structures , 1999, Brain and Language.

[22]  A. Almor Noun-phrase anaphora and focus : The informational load hypothesis , 1999 .

[23]  B. McElree,et al.  Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[25]  C. Chambers,et al.  Structural Parallelism and Discourse Coherence: A Test of Centering Theory , 1998 .

[26]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[29]  M. Pickering,et al.  Influence of Connectives on Language Comprehension: Eye tracking Evidence for Incremental Interpretation , 1997 .

[30]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[31]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch , 1996 .

[32]  A. Garnham,et al.  The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.

[33]  G. McKoon,et al.  Pronoun resolution without pronouns: some consequences of memory-based text processing. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[35]  W. Chafe Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing , 1996 .

[36]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  The Role of Parallelism in Strategies of Pronoun Comprehension , 1995 .

[37]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Cataphoric Devices in Spoken Discourse , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Janet L. McDonald,et al.  THE TIME COURSE OF ANAPHOR RESOLUTION: EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT VERB CAUSALITY AND GENDER , 1995 .

[39]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Effect of Focus on Memory for Words in Sentences , 1995 .

[40]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The advantage of first mention in Spanish , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[42]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[43]  B. McElree,et al.  The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .

[44]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Pronoun resolution and discourse models. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[47]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns , 1990 .

[48]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[49]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance , 1990, Language and speech.

[50]  P. Culicover,et al.  English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .

[51]  K. Kirsner,et al.  The representation of text-based and situation-based information in discourse comprehension , 1990 .

[52]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[53]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[54]  M. Gernsbacher Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[55]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[56]  M. Chodorow,et al.  Pronoun resolution in two-clause sentences: Effects of ambiguity, antecedent location, and depth of embedding ☆ , 1988 .

[57]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[58]  E. J. O'Brien Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[60]  J. Stern Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[61]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .

[62]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[63]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[64]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  The Interaction of Subjectivization and Concept Placement in the Processing of Cleft Sentences , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[65]  F. Keil Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 1982 .

[66]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  The given-new structure of cleft sentences and their influence on picture viewing , 1981 .

[67]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference , 1980 .

[68]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[69]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment , 1978, Cognition.

[70]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[71]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[72]  S. Sternberg Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[73]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[74]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[75]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[76]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[77]  S. Liversedge,et al.  The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[78]  Andrew Barss,et al.  Anaphora : a reference guide , 2003 .

[79]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language acquisition , 2003 .

[80]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora , 2001 .

[81]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[82]  Atsu Inoue,et al.  Syntactic Features in Reanalysis: Positive and Negative Symptoms , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[83]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[84]  R. Sandt,et al.  Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , 1999 .

[85]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Chapter 3 – Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time , 1998 .

[86]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[87]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Short-Term/Working Memory , 1996 .

[88]  Karen E. Lochbaum,et al.  Centering : A Framework for Modellingthe Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995 .

[89]  S. Garrod,et al.  Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .

[90]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[91]  Mira Ariel Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[92]  David A. Balota,et al.  Comprehension Processes in Reading , 1990 .

[93]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Referential processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. , 1990 .

[94]  G. G. Vining Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[95]  W. Vonk,et al.  Eye Movements During Comprehension of Pronouns , 1984 .

[96]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Pronouns Without Explicit Antecedents , 1983 .

[97]  T. Givón,et al.  Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .

[98]  T. Givon Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[99]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[100]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .