ImageGrouper: a group-oriented user interface for content-based image retrieval and digital image arrangement

In content-based image retrieval (CBIR), experimental (trial-and-error) query with relevance feedback is essential for successful retrieval. Unfortunately, the traditional user interfaces are not suitable for trying different combinations of query examples. This is because first, these systems assume query examples are always added incrementally. Second, the query and the result display are done on the same workspace. Once the user removes an image from the query examples, the image may disappear from the user interface. In addition, it is difficult to combine the result of different queries. In this paper, we propose a new interface for Content-based image retrieval named ImageGrouper. ImageGrouper is a Group-Oriented user interface in that all operations are done by creating groups of images. This approach has several advantages. First, the users can interactively compare different combinations of the query examples by dragging and grouping the images on the workspace (Query-by-Group). Because the query results are displayed on another pane, the user can quickly review the results and modify the query. Combining different queries is also easy. Furthermore, the concept of “Image Groups” is also applied for annotating and organizing many images. The Annotation-by-Groups method relieves the user of tedious task of annotating textual information on a large number of images. This method realizes a hierarchical annotation of the images as well as Bulk Annotation. The Organize-by-Group method lets the users manipulate the image groups as “Photo Albums” to organize the images. Finally, the usability of the system is compared with the traditional user interfaces. By incorporating the lessons from the experiments, the usability of ImageGrouper is further improved.

[1]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Transform features for texture classification and discrimination in large image databases , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Steve Jones Graphical query specification and dynamic result previews for a digital library , 1998, UIST '98.

[3]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[4]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Edge-Based Structural Features , 2003 .

[5]  John C. Dalton,et al.  Hierarchical browsing and search of large image databases , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? , 2001, CHI.

[7]  Michael L. Creech,et al.  FotoFile: a consumer multimedia organization and retrieval system , 1999, CHI '99.

[8]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval , 1998, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[9]  Henning Müller,et al.  Automated benchmarking in content-based image retrieval , 2001, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2001. ICME 2001..

[10]  Dragutin Petkovic,et al.  Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System , 1995, Computer.

[11]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Generalized relevance feedback scheme for image retrieval , 2000, SPIE Optics East.

[12]  Markus A. Stricker,et al.  Similarity of color images , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Simone Santini,et al.  Integrated browsing and querying for image databases , 2000, IEEE MultiMedia.

[14]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  VisualSEEk: a fully automated content-based image query system , 1997, MULTIMEDIA '96.

[15]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  MindReader: Querying Databases Through Multiple Examples , 1998, VLDB.

[17]  Gregory J. Wolff,et al.  Storytelling with digital photographs , 2000, CHI.

[18]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Orienteering in an information landscape: how information seekers get from here to there , 1993, INTERCHI.

[19]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  3D MARS: immersive virtual reality for content-based image retrieval , 2001, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2001. ICME 2001..

[20]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  The digital library integrated task environment (DLITE) , 1997, DL '97.

[21]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Comparing discriminating transformations and SVM for learning during multimedia retrieval , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[22]  Paul Over,et al.  Comparing interactive information retrieval systems across sites: the TREC-6 interactive track matrix experiment , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[23]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Optimizing learning in image retrieval , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[24]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Quantum Treemaps and Bubblemaps for a Zoomable Image Browser , 2001 .

[25]  Akihiro Sugimoto,et al.  Visualization of Information Spaces to Retrieve and Browse Image Data , 1999, VISUAL.

[26]  J. CoxI.,et al.  The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter , 2000 .

[27]  Jorma Laaksonen,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrvieval using Self-Organizing Maps , 1999 .

[28]  Myron Flickner,et al.  Query by Image and Video Content , 1995 .

[29]  Minh N. Do,et al.  Integrated Browsing and Searching of Large Image Collections , 2000, VISUAL.

[30]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct annotation: a drag-and-drop strategy for labeling photos , 2000, 2000 IEEE Conference on Information Visualization. An International Conference on Computer Visualization and Graphics.

[31]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: theory, implementation, and psychophysical experiments , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..