Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing

Understanding the successful adoption of information technology is largely based upon understanding the linkages among quality, satisfaction, and usage. Although the satisfaction and usage constructs have been well studied in the information systems literature, there has been only limited attention to information and system quality over the past decade. To address this shortcoming, we developed a model consisting of nine fundamental determinants of quality in an information technology context, four under the rubric of information quality (the output of an information system) and five that describe system quality (the information processing system required to produce the output). We then empirically examined the aptness of our model using a sample of 465 data warehouse users from seven different organizations that employed report-based, query-based, and analytical business intelligence tools. The results suggest that our determinants are indeed predictive of overall information and system quality in data warehouse environments, and that our model strikes a balance between comprehensiveness and parsimony. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for both theory and the development and implementation of information technology applications in practice.

[1]  Richard C. Morey,et al.  Estimating and improving the quality of information in a MIS , 1982, CACM.

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[3]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance , 2002, CACM.

[4]  Barbara Klein Assessments of Information Quality: Does the Medium Matter? , 2003, AMCIS.

[5]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1994, ICIS.

[6]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  A product perspective on total data quality management , 1998, CACM.

[7]  R. D. Buzzell,et al.  The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance , 1987 .

[8]  Charles A. Gallagher Perceptions of the Value of a Management Information System , 1974 .

[9]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[10]  Gary Klein,et al.  Measuring Information System Service Quality: SERVQUAL from the Other Side , 2002, MIS Q..

[11]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Time-Related Factors of Data Quality in Multichannel Information Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Chartjunk or goldgraph? Effects of persenataion objectives and content desirability on information presentation: effects of presentation objectives and content desirability on information presentation , 1999 .

[14]  Giri Kumar Tayi,et al.  Examining data quality , 1998, CACM.

[15]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION , 1978 .

[18]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[19]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[20]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[22]  Neal G. Shaw Capturing the Technological Dimensions of IT Infrastructure Change: A Model and Empirical Evidence , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[24]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[25]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices , 1997 .

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Short Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[28]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[29]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  J. Miller,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Computer-Based Information Systems in the Financial Services Sector , 1987, MIS Q..

[31]  John Moriarty,et al.  System Development Quality Control , 1978, MIS Q..

[32]  Craig W. Fisher,et al.  Criticality of data quality as exemplified in two disasters , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[33]  John L. Bennett,et al.  Building Decision Support Systems , 1983 .

[34]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems , 1985 .

[35]  D. Larcker,et al.  PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION: A PSYCHOMETRIC EXAMINATION* , 1980 .

[36]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[37]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[38]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  A conceptual framework and belief‐function approach to assessing overall information quality , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[39]  Henri Barki,et al.  Change, attitude to change, and decision support system success , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[41]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Ken Orr,et al.  Data quality and systems theory , 1998, CACM.

[43]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  Assessing Data Reliability in an Information System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  F. R. Keller,et al.  Data Quality , 1990, Taxation and Labour Supply.

[45]  Anany Levitin,et al.  Data as a Resource: Properties, Implications, and Prescriptions , 1998 .

[46]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Knowing-Why About Data Processes and Data Quality , 2004 .

[47]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Graphical and Color-Enhanced Information Presentation , 1985 .

[48]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  Managing the Response to Disasters Using Microcomputers , 1984 .

[50]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[51]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Can Humans Detect Errors in Data? Impact of Base Rates, Incentives, and Goals , 1997, MIS Q..

[52]  Yang W. Lee,et al.  Crafting Rules: Context-Reflective Data Quality Problem Solving , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  William R. King,et al.  ASSESSING INFORMATION SYSTEM VALUE: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1983 .

[54]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  System Development Methods - A Comparative Investigation , 1987, MIS Q..

[55]  Edward G. Schilling,et al.  Juran's Quality Handbook , 1998 .

[56]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[57]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Armand V. Feigenbaum,et al.  Total quality control , 1961 .

[59]  Holmes Miller,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[60]  Jon Rickman,et al.  On-line terminal response time: The effects of background activity , 1982, Inf. Manag..

[61]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[62]  J. N. Washburne An experimental study of various graphic, tabular, and textual methods of presenting quantitative material , 1927 .

[63]  B. K. Blaylock,et al.  COGNITIVE STYLE AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION , 1984 .

[64]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study , 1995 .

[65]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Chartjunk or Goldgraph? Effects of Presentation Objectives and Content Desirability on Information Presentation , 1999, MIS Q..

[67]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[68]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Modeling Information Manufacturing Systems to Determine Information Product Quality Management Scien , 1998 .

[69]  Ananth Srinivasan,et al.  Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications , 1985, MIS Q..

[70]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[71]  V. Zeithaml Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of customers: What we know and what we need to learn , 2000 .

[72]  Herman Wold,et al.  Systems under indirect observation : causality, structure, prediction , 1982 .

[73]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[74]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Information Quality for Mobile Internet Services: A Theoretical Model with Empirical Validation , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[75]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[76]  V. Zeithaml Delivering Quality Service , 1990 .

[77]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[78]  C. R. Anderson,et al.  Stage of the Product Life Cycle, Business Strategy, and Business Performance , 1984 .

[79]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[80]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[81]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[82]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[83]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[84]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  The Design and Implementation of a Corporate Householding Knowledge Processor to Improve Data Quality , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[85]  W. Deming Quality, productivity, and competitive position , 1982 .

[86]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .