Time-Resolved Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Head and Neck at 3.0 Tesla: Initial Results

Objectives:We sought to implement and evaluate a high-performance, extended field of view protocol for time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRA) of the carotid circulation by using a dedicated neurovascular (NV) array coil. Materials and Methods:A total of 16 adult volunteers and 20 clinical patients with suspected cerebrovascular disease (15 male, 21 female, 25–82 years of age) were scanned with a fast 3D MRA sequence (TR/TE: 2.16/1 milliseconds, sampling BW: 1090 Hz/pixel), with echo-sharing and parallel acquisition. All studies were performed on a 3.0 T MR system using an 8-channel neurovascular array coil. After injection of 6 mL of gadodiamide at 3 mL/s, a coronal 3D data set with in-plane resolution of 1 × 1.3 was implemented for 10 consecutive measurements each 1.8 seconds apart. The subjects subsequently underwent high spatial-resolution (in-plane: 0.8 × 0.9) CEMRA for comparative analysis. The quality of segmental arterial anatomy and the presence and degree of the arterial stenosis were evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists. The interobserver variability was tested by κ statistics and comparative analysis between the TR-CEMRA and high spatial-resolution CEMRA was evaluated by mean of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results:Craniocervical arteries were visualized with good image quality and definition in the diagnostic range. Occlusive disease was detected in 42 (reader A) and 44 (reader B) arterial segments with excellent interobserver agreement (κ =0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.82–0.96). There was a significant correlation between the TR-CEMRA and high spatial-resolution CEMRA (Rs = 0.91 and 0.93, for readers A and B, respectively) for the degree of stenosis. Three aneurysms, 3 AVMs, 1 AV-fistula, and 2 subclavian steals were detected by both observers and were confirmed by correlative imaging. Conclusion:Time-resolved CEMRA at 3.0 T is reliable and versatile, providing 3-dimensional time-resolved data sets with high spatial (in plane: 1.3 × 1 mm2) and temporal (1.8 seconds) resolution over a large field of view. The higher signal-to-noise ratio gain at 3.0 T can be used effectively to improve performance of fast imaging and to support aggressive parallel acquisition protocols, as in the present study. Further clinical studies are required to establish the range of applications and the accuracy of the technique.

[1]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  X. Golay,et al.  Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  P. A. Rinck,et al.  Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents , 1999, European Radiology.

[5]  Gerhard Laub,et al.  Dynamic 3D MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries in under four seconds , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  R Frayne,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. J. van Vaals,et al.  “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  R. Edelman,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics: A pilot study. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  James C Carr,et al.  Thorax: low-dose contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with subsecond temporal resolution--initial results. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[11]  J. Finn,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Circulation , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[12]  T M Grist,et al.  Carotid bifurcation: evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[13]  G. Schroth,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  F. Shellock,et al.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  J. Frisoli,et al.  Nephrotoxicity of high‐dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  W. Yuh,et al.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography , 2002, European Radiology.

[17]  J K Kim,et al.  Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[18]  K. Kuntz,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients--is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  G Laub,et al.  Theory of high-speed MR imaging of the human heart with the selective line acquisition mode. , 2001, Radiology.

[20]  L Remonda,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study. , 1998, Radiology.

[21]  C R Bird,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  F. Korosec,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[23]  U Salvolini,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). , 1999, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[24]  Dennis L Parker,et al.  High-resolution time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA by combining SENSE with keyhole and SLAM strategies. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  D. Sodickson,et al.  Ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio for parallel MRI: Electromagnetic field considerations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Martin Requardt,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Chest: Combination of Parallel Imaging With View Sharing (TREAT) , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[27]  I Mader,et al.  Dynamic 3D MR angiography of intra- and extracranial vascular malformations at 3T: a technical note. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  N J Pelc,et al.  Unaliasing by Fourier‐encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  C. Claussen,et al.  High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Renal Arteries Using Parallel Imaging Acquisition Techniques at 3.0 T: Initial Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[30]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[31]  W. Nitz,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-Observer Variability Compared With Selective Catheter Angiography , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[32]  M. Prince Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. , 1990, Radiology.

[33]  James C Carr,et al.  High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.