The implications of platform sharing on brand value

Purpose – The paper seeks to examine empirically the potential dilution and enhancement of brands that share product platforms with other brands.Design/methodology/approach – Study 1 uses two real platform‐sharing examples from the automobile and consumer electronics industries in an experimental setting. Study 2 uses conjoint analysis in the same two industries to study the impact of platform‐sharing on preference and willingness to pay for a unique brand.Findings – Study 1 finds that sharing a platform with an upscale brand is preferable to sharing with a downscale brand, although results are mixed on whether a unique‐to‐brand platform is preferred to sharing with an upscale brand. Study 2 finds that unique‐to‐brand platforms are preferred to any type of platform sharing, and calculates that this preference is worth about 6‐10 per cent of the product's retail price.Research limitations/implications – Both studies use student samples, although all product classes and brands tested are popular with this d...

[1]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Modeling the Role of Brand Alliances in the Assimilation of Product Evaluations , 2000 .

[2]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[3]  Mary W. Sullivan How Brand Names Affect the Demand for Twin Automobiles , 1998 .

[4]  J. Reast,et al.  Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: the relationship , 2005 .

[5]  S. Sanderson,et al.  A framework for model and product family competition , 1995 .

[6]  J. Douglas Carroll,et al.  Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .

[7]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[8]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design , 1999 .

[9]  Tülin Erdem An Empirical Analysis of Umbrella Branding , 1998 .

[10]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[11]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[12]  C. Fornell A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience: , 1992 .

[13]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[14]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Special Issue on the Marketing/Finance Interface , 2000 .

[15]  R. Verma,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms , 1999 .

[16]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[17]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[18]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects , 1996 .

[19]  Kevin Lane Keller Managing Brands for the Long Run: Brand Reinforcement and Revitalization Strategies , 1999 .

[20]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon , 1998 .

[21]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  The Impact of Brand Extensions on Parent Brand Memory Structures and Retrieval Processes , 1999 .

[22]  S. Laforet,et al.  Managing Brand Portfolios: Why Leaders Do What They Do , 1999 .

[23]  Richard R. Klink,et al.  Threats to the External Validity of Brand Extension Research , 2001 .

[24]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension , 1994 .

[25]  R. Rust,et al.  The Role of Marketing , 1999 .

[26]  M. Meyer,et al.  Product Platforms in Software Development , 1998 .

[27]  Latest thinking on attaching a financial value to marketing strategy: Through brands to valuing relationships , 2001 .

[28]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Products with Branded Components: An Approach for Premium Pricing and Partner Selection , 1997 .

[29]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Metrics for Managing Research and Development in the Context of the Product Family , 1997 .

[30]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency , 1991 .

[31]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Overhauling the new product process , 1996 .

[32]  B. Ratchford,et al.  The Impact of the Internet on Information Search for Automobiles , 2003 .

[33]  Mary W. Sullivan Measuring Image Spillovers in Umbrella-Branded Products , 1990 .

[34]  David E. Sprott,et al.  Using product sampling to augment the perceived quality of store brands , 2004 .

[35]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2001 .

[36]  Tim Ambler,et al.  Brand development versus new product development: toward a process model of extension decisions , 1997 .

[37]  H. H. Kassarjian Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[38]  Christian Homburg,et al.  A Marketing Perspective on Mergers and Acquisitions: How Marketing Integration Affects Postmerger Performance , 2005 .

[39]  Rajiv Vaidyanathan,et al.  Strategic brand alliances: implications of ingredient branding for national and private label brands , 2000 .

[40]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: \IThe World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century\N by Thomas L. Friedman. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005 , 2006 .

[41]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[42]  Bernard L. Simonin,et al.  Is a Company Known by the Company it Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes , 1998 .

[43]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  From Experience: The invisible success factors in product innovation , 1999 .

[44]  André M. Everett,et al.  Brand corrosion: mass‐marketing's threat to luxury automobile brands after merger and acquisition , 2006 .

[45]  N. Dawar What are brands good for , 2004 .

[46]  J. Carroll,et al.  Guest Editorial: Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .

[47]  J. Munuera-Aleman,et al.  Does brand trust matter to brand equity , 2005 .

[48]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Signaling Unobservable Product Quality through a Brand Ally , 1999 .

[49]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New Products: The Key Factors in Success , 1990 .

[50]  Robert E. Widing,et al.  Are interactive decision aids better than passive decision aids? A comparison with implications for information providers on the internet , 2002 .