Appropriability, patents, and rates of innovation in complex products industries

The economic theory of intellectual property rights is based on a rather narrow view of both competition and technological knowledge. We suggest some ways of enriching this framework with a more empirically grounded view of both and, by means of a simulation model, we analyse the impact of different property right regimes on the dynamics of a complex product industry, that is an industry where products are complex multi-component objects and competition takes place mainly through differentiation and component innovation. We show that, as the complexity of the product spaces increases, stronger patent regimes yield lower rates of innovation, lower product quality, and lower consumers’ welfare.

[1]  J. Lerner.  150 Years of Patent Protection , 1999 .

[2]  M. Heller,et al.  The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets , 1998 .

[3]  G. Dosi,et al.  How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?: On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation , 2006 .

[4]  Sunil Kanwar,et al.  Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights , 2006 .

[5]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[6]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[7]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation , 2000 .

[8]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[9]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[10]  T. Vallée,et al.  Social and Technological Efficiency of Patent Systems , 2004 .

[11]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2008 .

[12]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Patents and Welfare in an Evolutionary Model , 1993 .

[13]  Ted O'Donoghue,et al.  A Patentability Requirement For Sequential Innovation , 1998 .

[14]  Georg von Graevenitz,et al.  Incidence and Growth of Patent Thickets: The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Complexity , 2008 .

[15]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[16]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? , 1997 .

[17]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[18]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[19]  P. David.  Knowledge, Property, and the System Dynamics of Technological Change , 1992 .

[20]  J. Sutton.  Technology and Market Structure , 1998 .

[21]  David K. Levine,et al.  Against Intellectual Monopoly , 2008 .

[22]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving , 2005 .

[23]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  HISTORICAL ALTERNATIVES TO MASS PRODUCTION: POLITICS, MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGY IN NINETEEN-THCENTURY INDUSTRIALIZATION , 1985 .

[24]  André de Palma,et al.  Demand for Differentiated Products, Discrete Choice Models, and the Characteristics Approach , 1989 .

[25]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[26]  Luigi Marengo,et al.  Decomposability and modularity of economic interactions , 2001 .

[27]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective invention during the British , 2004 .

[28]  T. Vallée,et al.  Social and technological efficiency of patent systems , 2004 .

[29]  A. Jaffe.  The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[30]  A..  THE TRAGEDY OF THE ANTICOMMONS : PROPERTY IN THE TRANSITION FROM MARX TO MARKETS , 2007 .

[31]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[32]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[33]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[34]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Scaling Heuristics Shape Technology! Should Economic Theory Take Notice? , 2008 .

[35]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[36]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  The Geography of Invention in the American Glass Industry, 1870–1925 , 2000 .

[37]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[38]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[39]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  The Strategic Use of Patents and Its Implications for Enterprise and Competition Policies, Report ENTR/05/82 for DG Enterprise, European Commission , 2007 .

[40]  D. Levine,et al.  The Case Against Intellectual Property , 2002 .

[41]  S. Klepper,et al.  Submarkets and the evolution of market structure , 2006 .

[42]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis.  Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Exploring the Patent Explosion , 2004, The Journal of Technology Transfer.