Investigations on feed intake and social behaviour of fattening pigs fed at an electronic feeding station

Abstract For the study from a total of 679 female pigs kept in a progeny test station in 64 groups mostly with 12 pigs each, the data from all visits at an electronic feeding station (EFS) were analysed. In 93 pigs (8 groups) all agonistic interactions at the EFS were recorded in continuous observations using infrared video technique during 3× 48h at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the fattening period and registered in a 12×12-matrix in order to calculate the rank index (from −1 to +1) and rank place (from 1 to 12) for each animal. All EFS visits, the duration of each stay at EFS (MDS) and the recorded amount of feed at each EFS visit (MFI) were downloaded from the Compident EFS for the 3×48 h periods during the whole observation period. Means were calculated for pigs with high (1–6) or low rank position (7–12) and for pigs according to their individual rank places (1–12). The pigs with the fewest EFS visits had a significantly longer MDS (5.1min) and a significantly higher MFI (176.7g) than pigs which came to the EFS most frequently (MDS=3.4min, MFI=109.8g). At all stages of the fattening period, high ranking pigs had less EFS visits during 48h, a longer MDS and a higher MFI compared with low ranking group-members. The two pigs with the highest rank places of each group had significantly less visits at the EFS (745) during the whole observation period than subdominant pigs (1637). Dominant pigs occupying the first three places in the social hierarchy of the group had a longer MDS (6.6min on average) and in tendency a higher MFI (228g) compared with subdominant pen-mates (3.2min, 101g). The routinely collected and stored data (EFS visits, MDS and MFI) of the Compident EFS could be used as a tool for phenotyping the behaviour of fattening pigs, especially the feed intake and social behaviour which might be leading to long-term breeding decisions.

[1]  A. D. Vries,et al.  Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs , 1993 .

[2]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Feed Intake Behaviour of different Pig Breeds during Performance Testing on Station , 2006 .

[3]  A. Boissy,et al.  The social behaviour of cattle. , 2001 .

[4]  Alistair Lawrence,et al.  Feeding behaviour of pigs recorded on a computerised feeding system , 1994 .

[5]  Lawrence,et al.  The effect of group housing on feeding patterns and social behaviour of previously individually housed growing pigs. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[6]  D. A. Wieckert,et al.  Social behavior in farm animals. , 1971, Journal of animal science.

[7]  Alistair Lawrence,et al.  Feeding behaviour of pigs in groups monitored by a computerized feeding system , 1994 .

[8]  J. Langbein,et al.  A comparative view on social hierarchy formation at different stages of pig production using sociometric measures , 2008 .

[9]  Charlotte Leiber-Schotte Einfluss der Rangordnung bei Jungebern im Eigenleistungstest auf Futteraufnahme und Futteraufnahmeverhalten unter Berücksichtigung endokrinologischer und immunologischer Parameter , 2009 .

[10]  M. Ellis,et al.  Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[11]  K. Komm University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover , 2010 .

[12]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Predicted responses to selection from indices incorporating feeding pattern traits of pigs using electronic feeders , 1999 .

[13]  Lars Schrader Methoden der Nutztierethologie , 2006 .

[14]  J. Merks,et al.  Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigs , 1992 .

[15]  H. Erhard,et al.  Individual differences and personality , 2001 .