Gradient nano-engineered in situ forming composite hydrogel for osteochondral regeneration.

Fabrication of anisotropic osteochondral-mimetic scaffold with mineralized subchondral zone and gradient interface remains challenging. We have developed an injectable semi-interpenetrating network hydrogel construct with chondroitin sulfate nanoparticles (ChS-NPs) and nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) (∼30-90 nm) in chondral and subchondral hydrogel zones respectively. Mineralized subchondral hydrogel exhibited significantly higher osteoblast proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity (p < 0.05). Osteochondral hydrogel exhibited interconnected porous structure and spatial variation with gradient interface of nHA and ChS-NPs. Microcomputed tomography (μCT) demonstrated nHA gradation while rheology showed predominant elastic modulus (∼930 Pa) at the interface. Co-culture of osteoblasts and chondrocytes in gradient hydrogels showed layer-specific retention of cells and cell-cell interaction at the interface. In vivo osteochondral regeneration by biphasic (nHA or ChS) and gradient (nHA + ChS) hydrogels was compared with control using rabbit osteochondral defect after 3 and 8 weeks. Complete closure of defect was observed in gradient (8 weeks) while defect remained in other groups. Histology demonstrated collagen and glycosaminoglycan deposition in neo-matrix and presence of hyaline cartilage-characteristic matrix, chondrocytes and osteoblasts. μCT showed mineralized neo-tissue formation, which was confined within the defect with higher bone mineral density in gradient (chondral: 0.42 ± 0.07 g/cc, osteal: 0.64 ± 0.08 g/cc) group. Further, biomechanical push-out studies showed significantly higher load for gradient group (378 ± 56 N) compared to others. Thus, the developed nano-engineered gradient hydrogel enhanced hyaline cartilage regeneration with subchondral bone formation and lateral host-tissue integration.

[1]  J. Xie,et al.  Physiological oxygen tension modulates soluble growth factor profile after crosstalk between chondrocytes and osteoblasts , 2016, Cell proliferation.

[2]  Klaus D. Jandt,et al.  Temperature-sensitive PVA/PNIPAAm semi-IPN hydrogels with enhanced responsive properties. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  A. Bhosale,et al.  Articular cartilage: structure, injuries and review of management. , 2008, British medical bulletin.

[5]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  Multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[6]  Xiaoyan Yuan,et al.  A pilot study of conically graded chitosan-gelatin hydrogel/PLGA scaffold with dual-delivery of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 for regeneration of cartilage-bone interface. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[7]  S. Bryant,et al.  Mechanical loading regulates human MSC differentiation in a multi-layer hydrogel for osteochondral tissue engineering. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  Jhamak Nourmohammadi,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of carboxylated starch-chitosan bioactive scaffold for bone regeneration. , 2016, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[9]  R. Tuan,et al.  In vivo response of polylactic acid-alginate scaffolds and bone marrow-derived cells for cartilage tissue engineering. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[10]  Jiang Peng,et al.  Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of an articular cartilage extracellular matrix-hydroxyapatite bilayered scaffold with low permeability for interface tissue engineering , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[11]  Jiandong Ding,et al.  Effect of porosities of bilayered porous scaffolds on spontaneous osteochondral repair in cartilage tissue engineering , 2015, Regenerative biomaterials.

[12]  Yong Liu,et al.  Development of Novel Biocomposite Scaffold of Chitosan-Gelatin/Nanohydroxyapatite for Potential Bone Tissue Engineering Applications , 2016, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[13]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[14]  Antonios G Mikos,et al.  Dual growth factor delivery from bilayered, biodegradable hydrogel composites for spatially-guided osteochondral tissue repair. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[15]  Rinti Banerjee,et al.  Self-crosslinked oxidized alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  Dichen Li,et al.  The effect of interface microstructure on interfacial shear strength for osteochondral scaffolds based on biomimetic design and 3D printing. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[17]  D. Kaplan,et al.  A biphasic scaffold based on silk and bioactive ceramic with stratified properties for osteochondral tissue regeneration. , 2015, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[18]  Xiaoyan Yuan,et al.  Photocrosslinked layered gelatin-chitosan hydrogel with graded compositions for osteochondral defect repair , 2015, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[19]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  Sundararajan V Madihally,et al.  Anisotropic temperature sensitive chitosan-based injectable hydrogels mimicking cartilage matrix. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Osteochondral tissue engineering: scaffolds, stem cells and applications , 2012, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[22]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration , 2009, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[23]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Development and Characterization of Biodegradable Nanocomposite Injectables for Orthopaedic Applications Based on Polyphosphazenes , 2011, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[24]  J. Murphy,et al.  Pullulan: a new cytoadhesive for cell-mediated cartilage repair , 2015, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[25]  D. Wirz,et al.  Correlation between mineralization and mechanical strength of the subchondral bone plate of the humeral head. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[26]  Hang Wang,et al.  Ectopic osteochondral formation of biomimetic porous PVA-n-HA/PA6 bilayered scaffold and BMSCs construct in rabbit. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[27]  A. Subramanian,et al.  Injectable and 3D Bioprinted Polysaccharide Hydrogels: From Cartilage to Osteochondral Tissue Engineering. , 2017, Biomacromolecules.

[28]  Richard M Aspden,et al.  Mechanical and material properties of the subchondral bone plate from the femoral head of patients with osteoarthritis or osteoporosis , 1997, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[29]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Mechanical properties and osteocompatibility of novel biodegradable alanine based polyphosphazenes: Side group effects. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Bioglass®/chitosan-polycaprolactone bilayered composite scaffolds intended for osteochondral tissue engineering. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[31]  A. A. Amini,et al.  Injectable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair , 2012, Biomedical materials.

[32]  W. Bugbee,et al.  Shaped, Stratified, Scaffold-free Grafts for Articular Cartilage Defects , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  Ming-Long Yeh,et al.  The combined effects of continuous passive motion treatment and acellular PLGA implants on osteochondral regeneration in the rabbit. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[34]  Nicholas Uth,et al.  Current strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: A review. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[35]  Susan X. Hsiong,et al.  Regulation of chondrocyte differentiation level via co-culture with osteoblasts. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[36]  A. Subramanian,et al.  Phase-induced porous composite microspheres sintered scaffold with protein–mineral interface for bone tissue engineering , 2015 .

[37]  B. Mandal,et al.  Mimicking Hierarchical Complexity of the Osteochondral Interface Using Electrospun Silk-Bioactive Glass Composites. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[38]  T. Kurokawa,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coated double network hydrogel directly bondable to the bone: Biological and biomechanical evaluations of the bonding property in an osteochondral defect. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[39]  D. Xiong,et al.  Friction properties of novel PVP/PVA blend hydrogels as artificial cartilage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[40]  H. Sung,et al.  MG-63 cells proliferation following various types of mechanical stimulation on cells by auxetic hybrid scaffolds , 2016, Biomaterials Research.

[41]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial , 1999 .

[42]  L. March,et al.  Current evidence for osteoarthritis treatments , 2010, Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease.

[43]  C. Helmick,et al.  A public health approach to addressing arthritis in older adults: the most common cause of disability. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[44]  Masanori Kikuchi,et al.  Repair of large osteochondral defects in rabbits using porous hydroxyapatite/collagen (HAp/Col) and fibroblast growth factor‐2 (FGF‐2) , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[45]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[46]  A. Subramanian,et al.  Injectable glycosaminoglycan-protein nano-complex in semi-interpenetrating networks: A biphasic hydrogel for hyaline cartilage regeneration. , 2017, Carbohydrate polymers.

[47]  R. Reis,et al.  Current Concepts and Challenges in Osteochondral Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. , 2015, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.