Implementing multi-step chemical kinetics models in opposed-flow flame spread over cellulose and a comparison to single-step chemistry

Multi-step, gas-phase chemical kinetics are introduced into flame spread modeling efforts. An unsteady multi-step, gas-phase kinetics model both with and without steady-state species assumptions, and including nonunit Lewis number, is compared with a model including a single, finite-rate gas-phase reaction, which has been the usual approach in flame spread modeling. Laminar diffusion flames over a thin fuel in an opposing O2 / N2 flow are considered with the solution in two-dimensional space of momentum, energy, and 12 gas-phase species. Results for the multi-step models show detailed flame structure in terms of species and heat release distributions throughout the flame and the role of chemical kinetics as a controlling mechanism in flame spread. Of particular interest is the potential of multi-step chemical kinetics in solutions at near-extinction limit conditions. While the incorporation of nonunit Le alone affords more detailed species transport, in high opposing flows it was found to give only minor structural differences from the single-step unit Le model. The multi-step chemistry allows for the gas kinetics to be self-adjusting to environmental conditions. As a result, the distribution of endothermicity and exothermicity throughout the flame and for particular reversible reactions is found to be a function of the flow environment, which overcomes a major drawback of single-step models, namely a fixed heat of combustion independent of environmental conditions, or one that must be determined separately from the model itself.

[1]  R. Altenkirch,et al.  A Theoretical Description of Flame Spreading over Solid Combustibles in a Quiescent Environment at Zero Gravity , 1990 .

[2]  R. Altenkirch,et al.  Gravitational effects on flames spreading over thick solid surfaces , 1985 .

[3]  Abdelkader Frendi,et al.  Combustion properties of pure and fire-retarded cellulose , 1991 .

[4]  N. Peters,et al.  Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms for Applications in Combustion Systems , 1993 .

[5]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  A theory of laminar flame spread over flat surfaces of solid combustibles , 1977 .

[6]  J. S. T'ien,et al.  A theory of flame spread over a solid fuel including finite-rate chemical kinetics , 1979 .

[7]  James S. T'ien,et al.  Near-limit flame spread over paper samples , 1976 .

[8]  Subrata Bhattacharjee,et al.  The behavior of flames spreading over thin solids in microgravity , 1995 .

[9]  G. Cox Combustion fundamentals of fire , 1995 .

[10]  C. Law,et al.  Steady State Diffusion Flame Structure with Lewis Number Variations , 1982 .

[11]  A. Fernandez-Pello,et al.  Controlling Mechanisms of Flame Spread , 1983 .

[12]  Takashi Kashiwagi,et al.  Global kinetic constants for thermal oxidative degradation of a cellulosic paper , 1992 .

[13]  R. Altenkirch,et al.  A Comparison of the Roles Played by Natural and Forced Convection in Opposed-Flow Flame Spreading , 1992 .

[14]  Indrek S. Wichman,et al.  A Simplified Model of Flame Spread in an Opposed Flow along a Flat Surface of a Semi-infinite Solid , 1983 .

[15]  R. Altenkirch,et al.  Correlating Downward Flame Spread Rates for Thick Fuel Beds , 1983 .

[16]  R. Altenkirch,et al.  Effects of Pyrolysis Kinetics on Opposed-Flow Flame Spread Modeling , 1994 .

[17]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.