The precautionary principle - Risk, regulation and politics

The precautionary principle is a regulatory tool that has received much attention among policy makers, industry and academics. The purpose of this paper is to shed further light on this regulatory tool. I start the paper by focusing on the question what is the precautionary principle, and how its use by policy makers has changed significantly from the 1970s to the present time. The second part of the paper examines why the precautionary principle is so controversial, examining in particular the use of it in terms of trade. The third section analyses why the precautionary principle has grown in popularity, and here I touch on, among other issues, the lack of public trust in science, its promotion by the NGOs and its application as a tool for trade protectionism. In the final section of the paper I discuss whether the precautionary principle, particularly in the European context, is here to stay. I conclude, that the use of the precautionary principle will be with the Europeans only through the medium term, as arguably it appears that the EU is following a US regulator path, albeit with a 30 year time lag.

[1]  Sandra L. Albrecht,et al.  Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy. , 1981 .

[2]  L. Lundqvist,et al.  The hare and the tortoise, clean air policies in the United States and Sweden, by L.J. Lundqvist. Canada: University of Michigan Press, and New York: Wiley, 1980, 236 pp. No price given , 1983 .

[3]  The Failure of Agency-Forcing: The Regulation of Airborne Carcinogens Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act , 1985 .

[4]  David Vogel,et al.  National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States , 1986 .

[5]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[6]  S. Breyer.  Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation , 1993 .

[7]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[8]  M. Mccally,et al.  Positively Parents: Caring for a Severely Disabled Child; Taking Care; Running a Team for Disabled Children and Their Families; The Integration of Disabled Children into Mainstream Education: Ambitions, Theories and Practices , 1995 .

[9]  R. Lofstedt,et al.  Risk communication. The Barseback nuclear plant case , 1996 .

[10]  Ragnar E. Löfstedt,et al.  The Barseback nuclear plant case , 1996 .

[11]  Breaking the Environmental Policy Gridlock , 1997 .

[12]  David Vogel,et al.  Trading Up , 1997 .

[13]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking , 1997 .

[14]  J. Clarence Davies,et al.  Pollution Control in the United States: Evaluating the System , 1998 .

[15]  R. Simmons.  Fixing the Endangered Species Act , 1999 .

[16]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Implementation of EU Environmental Policy; A Policy Problem without a Political Solution? , 1999 .

[17]  The Role of Trust in the North Blackforest: An Evaluation of a Citizen Panel Project , 1999 .

[18]  P. Sandin.  Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle , 1999, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[19]  Julian Morris,et al.  Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle , 2000 .

[20]  Warwick Gullett,et al.  Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle , 2000 .

[21]  Peter H. Sand,et al.  The Precautionary Principle: A European Perspective , 2000 .

[22]  John S. Applegate,et al.  The Precautionary Preference: An American Perspective on the Precautionary Principle , 2000 .

[23]  Wendy E. Wagner.  The Precautionary Principle and Chemical Regulation in the U.S. , 2000 .

[24]  D. Vogel.  The new politics of risk regulation in Europe , 2001 .

[25]  J. Cameron,et al.  Reinterpreting the precautionary principle , 2001 .

[26]  I. Goklany.  The precautionary principle : a critical appraisal of environmental risk assessment , 2001 .

[27]  D. Vogel,et al.  The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Risk and Regulation: Boat Owners' Perceptions of Recent Antifouling Legislation , 2001 .

[29]  Jonathan B. Wiener,et al.  Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe , 2002 .

[30]  R. Kagan,et al.  Regulatory encounters : multinational corporations and American adversarial legalism , 2002 .

[31]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Precautionary principles: general definitions and specific applications to genetically modified organisms , 2002 .

[32]  G. Charnley,et al.  Risk Versus Precaution: Environmental Law and Public Health Protection , 2002 .