The perception of object versus objectless motion

Wertheimer, M. (Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 61:161–265, 1912) classical distinction between beta (object) and phi (objectless) motion is elaborated here in a series of experiments concerning competition between two qualitatively different motion percepts, induced by sequential changes in luminance for two-dimensional geometric objects composed of rectangular surfaces. One of these percepts is of spreading-luminance motion that continuously sweeps across the entire object; it exhibits shape invariance and is perceived most strongly for fast speeds. Significantly for the characterization of phi as objectless motion, the spreading luminance does not involve surface boundaries or any other feature; the percept is driven solely by spatiotemporal changes in luminance. Alternatively, and for relatively slow speeds, a discrete series of edge motions can be perceived in the direction opposite to spreading-luminance motion. Akin to beta motion, the edges appear to move through intermediate positions within the object’s changing surfaces. Significantly for the characterization of beta as object motion, edge motion exhibits shape dependence and is based on the detection of oppositely signed changes in contrast (i.e., counterchange) for features essential to the determination of an object’s shape, the boundaries separating its surfaces. These results are consistent with area MT neurons that differ with respect to speed preference Newsome et al (Journal of Neurophysiology, 55:1340–1351, 1986) and shape dependence Zeki (Journal of Physiology, 236:549–573, 1974).

[1]  Vebjørn Ekroll,et al.  Classification of apparent motion percepts based on temporal factors. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[2]  G Sperling,et al.  Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Jocelyn Faubert,et al.  The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  Lee A. Gilroy,et al.  Counter-Changing Luminance: A Non-Fourier, Nonattentional Basis for the Perception of Single-Element Apparent Motion , 2002 .

[5]  Donald L. Schurman,et al.  Stimulus Intensity and Foreperiod Effects in Intersensory Facilitation , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Voluntary and Stimulus-Induced Attention Detected as Motion Sensation , 1993, Perception.

[7]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.

[8]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Chapter 6 – The Perception of Motion Pictures , 1996 .

[9]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Common-fate motion processing: Interaction of the On and Off pathways , 2009, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[11]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[12]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[13]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  George Sperling,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Visual Motion Perception , 1999 .

[15]  C. Gross,et al.  Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. II. Effects of superior colliculus removal , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. III. Psychophysics and physiology of apparent motion. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  R. Steinman,et al.  Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer’s discovery launched the Gestalt revolution , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  C. Tyler.  Temporal characteristics in apparent movement: omega movement vs. phi movement. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  A counterchange mechanism for the perception of motion. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[22]  R T SAUCER,et al.  The nature of perceptual processes. , 1953, Science.

[23]  David F. Nichols,et al.  The line motion illusion: the detection of counterchanging edge and surface contrast. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[25]  C. Gross,et al.  Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[27]  S Zeki,et al.  Conscious visual perception without V1. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  A. Cowey,et al.  Motion discrimination in cortically blind patients. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  High-Level Motion Processing , 1998 .

[30]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  S. Zeki.  Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Processing Shape, Motion and Three-dimensional Shape-from-motion in the Human Cortex , 2003 .

[33]  Paul Azzopardi,et al.  Illusory motion perception in blindsight , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.