Abciximab Readministration: Results of the ReoPro Readministration Registry

Background—Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with abciximab (ReoPro) improves the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. This registry was conducted to characterize the effects of repeated administration of abciximab during intervention. Methods and Results—We recruited 500 consecutive patients at 22 centers in the United States who were receiving abciximab for at least a second time during percutaneous coronary intervention. Safety was measured as the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, major bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Efficacy was assessed as event-free clinical success. Human antichimeric antibody (HACA) responses were also characterized. There were no cases of hypersensitivity (95% upper confidence bound, 0.3%), major bleeding, or death. Clinical success was 94.4%. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 patients (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.8% to 6.4%), including 12 (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.1% to 3.7%) who developed profound thrombocytopenia (<20×109 cells/L). In 2 patients (0.4%), profound thrombocytopenia did not develop until after hospital discharge; in 4 (0.8%), profound thrombocytopenia recurred despite platelet transfusion. Before a first readministration, a positive HACA titer was present in 22 of 454 patients (4.8%); after a first readministration, an additional 82 of 432 (19.0%) became HACA-positive. HACA did not neutralize the in vitro inhibition of platelet aggregation by abciximab or correlate with clinical events. Conclusions—The results, including overall rates of thrombocytopenia, were consistent with randomized clinical trials of first abciximab treatment. However, there was a shift from mild to profound thrombocytopenia, and cases of delayed presentation and of recurrent thrombocytopenia were seen. These findings suggest that indications and guidelines for first-time use apply to retreatment, particularly the systematic monitoring for thrombocytopenia.

[1]  M. Madan,et al.  Understanding thrombocytopenia and antigenicity with glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. , 1999, American heart journal.

[2]  D. Mascarenhas,et al.  Abciximab readministration: A single‐operator community‐hospital experience , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  E. Antman,et al.  Abciximab facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 14 trial. The TIMI 14 Investigators. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  Y. Gruel,et al.  Decision analysis for use of platelet aggregation test, carbon 14-serotonin release assay, and heparin-platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  David P Miller,et al.  Clinical outcomes of therapeutic agents that block the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin in ischemic heart disease. , 1998, Circulation.

[6]  J. Tcheng,et al.  Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  E. Topol Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  H. Weisman,et al.  Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term abciximab treatment demonstrates prolonged platelet inhibition with gradual recovery from GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. , 1998, Circulation.

[9]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Safe use of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. , 1998, American heart journal.

[10]  Epilog Investigators,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Harrington,et al.  Acute profound thrombocytopenia after C7E3 Fab (abciximab) therapy. , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  D. Kereiakes,et al.  Abciximab-associated profound thrombocytopenia: therapy with immunoglobulin and platelet transfusion. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  A. Jawad,et al.  Comparison of PF4/heparin ELISA assay with the 14C-serotonin release assay in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  H. Weisman,et al.  The immunogenicity of the 7E3 murine monoclonal Fab antibody fragment variable region is dramatically reduced in humans by substitution of human for murine constant regions. , 1995, Molecular immunology.

[15]  J. Talley,et al.  Heparin associated thrombocytopenia. , 1995, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.

[16]  Epic Investigators,et al.  Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  Profound inhibition of platelet aggregation with monoclonal antibody 7E3 Fab after thrombolytic therapy. Results of the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) 8 Pilot Study. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  B. Coller A new murine monoclonal antibody reports an activation-dependent change in the conformation and/or microenvironment of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex. , 1985, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  Marshall A. Lichtman,et al.  Commentary on and reprint of EPIC (Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications) Investigators, The, Use of monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty, in New England Journal of Medicine (1994) 330:956–961 , 2000 .

[20]  J. Fareed,et al.  Clinical experience with combined treatment of thrombin inhibitors and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with HIT. , 1999, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.