What Results When Firms Implement Practices: The Differential Relationship between Specific Practices, Firm Financial Performance, Customer Service, and Quality

Previous research on organizational practices is replete with contradictory evidence regarding their effects. Here, the authors argue that these contradictory findings may have occurred because researchers have often examined complex practice combinations and have failed to investigate a broad variety of firm-level outcomes. Thus, past research may obscure important differential effects of specific practices on specific firm-level outcomes. Extending this research, the authors develop hypotheses about the effects of practices that (a) enable information sharing, (b) set boundaries, and (c) enable teams on 3 different firm-level outcomes: financial performance, customer service, and quality. Relationships are tested in a sample of observations from over 200 Fortune 1000 firms. Results indicate that information-sharing practices were positively related to financial performance 1 year following implementation of the practices, boundary-setting practices were positively related to firm-level customer service, and team-enabling practices were related to firm-level quality. No single set of practices predicted all 3 firm-level outcomes, indicating practice-specific effects. These findings help resolve the theoretical tension in the literature regarding the effects of organizational practices and offer guidance as to how to best target practices to increase specific work-related outcomes. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

[1]  J. Steenkamp.  Conceptual model of the quality perception process , 1990 .

[2]  M. Wiatrowski.  Designing Performance Appraisal Systems: Aligning Appraisals and Organizational Realities , 1991 .

[3]  Stephen Martin.  The Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return: Comment , 1984 .

[4]  Leonard A. Schlesinger,et al.  Enfranchisement of Service Workers , 1991 .

[5]  J. Wagner,et al.  PERCEPT-PERCEPT INFLATION IN MICRO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: AN INVESTIGATION OF PREVALENCE AND EFFECT. , 1993 .

[6]  J. Wagner,et al.  Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and Effect , 1994 .

[7]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Beyond testimonials: Learning from a quality circles programme , 1985 .

[8]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Serving multiple masters: role conflict experienced by service employees , 2002 .

[9]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  Methodological Issues in Cross‐Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource‐Firm Performance Link , 1996 .

[11]  William N. Cooke.  Employee Participation Programs, Group-Based Incentives, and Company Performance: A Union-Nonunion Comparison , 1994 .

[12]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Organizing for the future: the new logic for managing complex organizations , 1993 .

[13]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[14]  Paul Sicilian,et al.  Minimum Wages, On-the-Job Training, and Wage Growth , 1999 .

[15]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[16]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[17]  C. R. Greer,et al.  Organizational and Financial Correlates of a “Contrarian” Human Resource Investment Strategy , 1992 .

[18]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[19]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn.  Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Shelley A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Locus of Knowledge as a Determinant of the Effects of Participation on Performance, Affect, and Perceptions , 1995 .

[21]  W. Deming.  Quality, productivity, and competitive position , 1982 .

[22]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[23]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[24]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[25]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[26]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[27]  Hettie A. Richardson,et al.  The Impact of High Involvement Work Processes on Organizational Effectiveness , 1999 .

[28]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[29]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[30]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[31]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[32]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[33]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[34]  The Effect of Taxes on Corporate Debt Maturity Decisions: An Analysis of Public and Private Bond Offerings , 1999 .

[35]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[36]  J. Crant,et al.  Proactive Behavior in Organizations , 2000 .

[37]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[38]  Beverly R. Kraska.  Designing Performance Appraisal Systems: Aligning Appraisals and Organizational Realities , 1989 .

[39]  J. Shaw,et al.  Positive affectivity and negative outcomes: the role of tenure and job satisfaction. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[41]  W. Randolph,et al.  Navigating the journey to empowerment , 1995 .

[42]  T. G. Cummings,et al.  ACHIEVING SUPERIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE THROUGH EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION. , 1994 .

[43]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  Self-regulation: from goal orientation to job performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units , 2003 .

[45]  Ray W. Coye,et al.  An Exploration of Employee Participation Using a Scaling Approach , 2000 .

[46]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996 .

[47]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Organizational Performance: Recent Developments in Measurement , 1981 .

[48]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[49]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Organizational Characteristics as Predictors of Personnel Practices. , 1989 .

[50]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  AN OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF A BEHAVIOR MODELING TRAINING PROGRAM , 1983 .

[51]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[52]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Bandwagons Bring: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation, and CEO Pay , 2000 .

[53]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[54]  R. H. Franke.  The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement OrganizationThe Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization By LawlerEdward E.III, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992—371 pages. $29.95 , 1992 .

[55]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Steven E. Scullen,et al.  Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[58]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[59]  J. Pearce,et al.  Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance† , 1988 .

[60]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION CONTEXT: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEAM LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[61]  E. Lawler,et al.  The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[62]  Scott B. Jackson,et al.  Do Managers Grant Sales Price Reductions to Avoid Losses and Declines in Earnings and Sales , 2000 .

[63]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[64]  Peter L Block,et al.  The Empowered Manager , 1991 .

[65]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[66]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[67]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Test development and use: New twists on old questions , 2005 .

[68]  D. Campbell.  The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative , 2000 .

[69]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  The Southwest Airlines Way : Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve High Performance , 2002 .

[70]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Creating high performance organizations : practices and results of employee involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies , 1995 .

[71]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[72]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Employee versus owner issues in organizations , 2001 .

[73]  George S. Benson,et al.  Organizing for high performance : employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the fortune 1000 : CEO report/ Edward E. Lawler III, Susan Albers Mohrman, George Benson , 2001 .

[74]  G. Spreitzer,et al.  The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider , 1997 .

[75]  J. Pearce,et al.  The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance , 1987 .

[76]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[77]  Jimmy Black.  Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies , 1993 .

[78]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[79]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[80]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[81]  E. Lawler.  Total Quality Management and employee involvement: Are they compatible? , 1994 .

[82]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. , 1993 .

[83]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[84]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[85]  Neil Conway,et al.  Using sequential tree analysis to search for ‘bundles’ of HR practices , 2004 .

[86]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The Validity of ROI as a Measure of Business Performance , 1987 .

[87]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity , 2005 .

[88]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  Do 'High-Performance' Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes? , 1999 .